GB-CHC-1043843-FCOEgypt_B005
Saferworld
Securing engagement: Supporting Egyptian efforts to build and maintain momentum on security sector reform in Egypt
This project seeks to build the technical capacity of the National Initiative for Police Reform (NIPR) coalition and other civil society groups and to encourage them to engage more with other groups and popular priorities to push effectively for a workable reform vision. It lays the foundation for these groups to seize opportunities to push reforms when they arise, including after project completion.
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
150287
110003
48564
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
22219
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
21753
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
36190
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
260290
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
36171
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
73747
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
30049
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
25313
Saferworld
20381
Saferworld
23313
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
25227
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to February 2015
Saferworld
30055
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
12244
Saferworld
62200
Saferworld
22219
Saferworld
24639
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
website
Supporting Egyptian efforts to build and maintain momentum on security sector reform in Egypt
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDChina_A005_203174-101
Saferworld
Conflict Prevention Partnerships for the 21st Century: China and the UK
A 24-month project to help address the identified gaps through a two-strand process. The first strand focuses on deepening awareness and expertise on conflict prevention amongst a core Conflict Prevention Working Group (CPWG), made up of three Chinese and three UK policy influencers, based in universities, think tanks, NGOs and potentially the commercial sector. The second strand concentrates on facilitating outreach on conflict prevention amongst the wider policy and business communities in China and the UK.
Department for International Development
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
171336
171335
342671
Department for International Development
Saferworld
51395
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
39699
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
40302
Saferworld
48473
Saferworld
32123
Saferworld
48145
Saferworld
28149
Department for International Development
Saferworld
30457
Department for International Development
Saferworld
39699
Department for International Development
Saferworld
51395
Department for International Development
Saferworld
48145
Department for International Development
Saferworld
28150
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to February 2015
Saferworld
31250
Saferworld
30457
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners Q1 2014/15
Saferworld
89649
Department for International Development
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDA_Core_EZ*_2010-14
Saferworld
Preventing and reducing violent conflict and promoting cooperative approaches to security building
General support to Saferworld's work to prevent and reduce violent conflict and promote cooperative approaches to Security Building.
Saferworld
Sweden, through Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Worldwide
391000
383441
383441
404337
383441
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
391000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
1562219.39
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
383441
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
404337
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
383441
Saferworld
383441
Saferworld
404337
Saferworld
391000
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from September to December 2013
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDA-EZ*
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDUganda_A002_200250-103
Saferworld
Advisory Consortium on Conflict Sensitivity
Saferworld is a member of the Advisory Consortium on Conflict Sensitivity, a consortium supported by the UK Department for International Development to ensure that development interventions in northern Uganda effectively address the drivers of conflict and contribute to building peace. Our role in the consortium is to deliver evidence-based advocacy and provide conflict sensitivity advice and training to stakeholders involved in development initiatives in northern Uganda.
Department for International Development
Refugee Law Project
Saferworld
International Alert
Refugee Law Project
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
80470
184243
189312
108424
90354
78082
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
80644
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
73415
Funds disbursed via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
652803
Department for International Development
Saferworld
55880
Funds disbursed via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
160518.31
Funds disbursed via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
181933
Funds disbursed via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
109756
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to February 2015
Saferworld
46394
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
71329
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
67685
Saferworld
69752
Funds disbursed via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
62305.17
Incoming Funds from the Donor from April to June 2013 disbursed via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
66655
Saferworld
49000
Incoming Funds from the Donor from January to March 2014 received via Refugee Law Project
Department for International Development
Saferworld
69407
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
62851
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDUganda-ACH
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDPPA-AZ*_202709
Saferworld
Programmatic Partnership Agreement
Saferworld’s overall aim for the PPA funding period is to contribute to a reduction in violent conflict and insecurity in up to 14 target countries. We believe this can be achieved by focusing on key conditions for peace, especially: that people are free from fear and insecurity; have fair and effective paths to address their grievances; and have opportunities to play a central role in transforming conflict and building peace. Our theory of change is that a broad range of actors have a role to play in achieving conditions needed for lasting peace, and that Saferworld can play a pivotal role in informing, influencing and bringing those actors together. This proposal covers the Horn and Great Lakes regions of Africa (regionally and in Kenya, Somalia/Somaliland, Sudan and Uganda); South Asia (regionally and in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka); Central Asia (Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan); the Caucasus (regionally and in Georgia/South Ossetia/Abkhazia); Balkans (regionally and in Bosnia, Kosovo and Moldova); and the Middle East (Yemen). Saferworld proposes four specific objectives for the PPA, derived from the four categories of outcomes contained within our results framework.
Saferworld
Department for International Development
The activity was extended twice for the following periods: 1 April 2014 - 31 March 2016 1 April 2016 - 31 December 2016
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Worldwide
1739160
1739160
1739160
1739160
1739160
1304370
3478320
Department for International Development
Saferworld
1304370
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
5217480
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
434790
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
869580
Income Funds received from October to December 2013
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
869580
Cumulative funds received in Q3 of 2014/2015
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
869580
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
434790
Department for International Development
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDPPA-AZ*
GB-CHC-1043843-DANIDANepal_H007
Saferworld
Enabling Civil Society to Contribute to more Effective, Inclusive and Accountable Public Security Policy and Programming in Nepal
We are supporting local people to engage with the police and local authorities so they tackle their security concerns together; and with civil society to advocate for more gender-responsive safety provision. We use the findings from these projects to influence district and national level policy and practice.
Saferworld
DANIDA - Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Informal Sector Service Center (INSEC)
Saferworld
Institute for Human Rights and Communication Nepal (IHRICON)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
131211.1
131211.1
32802.8
43990
Saferworld
31283
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
50692
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
240768
Incoming Funds received from July to September 2013
DANIDA - Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
295225
DANIDA - Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
52573
DANIDA - Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
35093
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
132283
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-DANIDA-HBP
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SDCKyrgyzstan_H001
Saferworld
Gender-sensitive community security and conflict prevention in the Ferghana Valley
Saferworld has been supporting civil society organisations in southern Kyrgyzstan and northern Tajikistan to put conflict and gender-sensitive approaches into practice in their work since 2010. We provide training, consultancy and mentoring on conflict sensitivity, conflict analysis and security sector reform, building the capacity of local civil society within Central Asia.
Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI)
Association for Scientific and Technological Intelligentsia (ASTI)
Saferworld
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
94524
39385
-2395
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
133909
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
60295
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
6584
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
3865
Saferworld
67030
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
52318
Saferworld
80121
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SADC-Kyrgyz-HCC
GB-CHC-1043843-ECPakistan_D002
Saferworld
Promoting participatory approaches to peacebuilding in KP and FATA of Pakistan
This is a three year programme to promote and develop participatory peacebuilding initiatives in KP and FATA. We are supporting civil society organisations in the region to gain the skills and confidence needed to ensure that decision-makers understand and act on local security needs and that communities and marginalised groups are consulted in national and international peace efforts. We deliver trainings for CSOs aimed at developing practical skills and theoretical knowledge of peacebuilding on the following issues: participatory conflict analysis; conflict sensitivity; mediation, dialogue, negotiation and peacebuilding; advocacy for conflict transformation; understanding and measuring change; and community-driven initiatives for peace.
Saferworld
Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)
European Commission - EuropeAid
Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk/where/pakistan
55469
42593
42592
23070
1584
Saferworld
6140
Saferworld
72391
Saferworld
-6713
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013. The expenditure needed to be adjusted because the project activities stopped from February to July 2013.
Saferworld
8956
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
10575
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
4458
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
9052
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
6506
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
41604
Disbursed via Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
35397
Disbursed via Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
2306
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
163724
Disbursed via Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
38254
Disbursed via Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP)
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-EUPakistan-DCQ
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDKenya_A001_202527-113
Saferworld
Towards Peaceful and Secure 2012 Presidential Elections in Kenya
Ahead of the March 2013 elections, Saferworld worked with key peace, security and election management actors across Kenya to strengthen preparedness and coordination in support of peaceful, free and fair national polls. We are also continuing to work with grassroots peace actors in six potential hotspots to build resilience to conflict, promote peacebuilding and strengthen the capacity of community members to hold their leaders to account, including on issues of governance, security and service delivery.
Saferworld
Saferworld
Department for International Development
The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC)
National Steering Committee on Peace Building and Conflict Management (NSC)
National Cohesion and Integration Commission
Kenya Partnership for Peace and Security
Uwiano Platform for Peace
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk/where/kenya
557265
92878
414077
971342
Department for International Development
Saferworld
107721
Department for International Development
Saferworld
55753
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
213478
Department for International Development
Saferworld
240000
Saferworld
297558
Department for International Development
Saferworld
196789
Saferworld
148408
Department for International Development
Saferworld
137658
Saferworld
105884
Department for International Development
Saferworld
126414
Saferworld
98293
Department for International Development
Saferworld
53665
Saferworld
161063
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDKenya-AAE
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA_F001
Saferworld
Institutionalising Comprehensive Police Reforms in Kenya: Towards equitable, responsive and accountable policing in Kenya
This project aims to ensure that broader reforms within the security sector in general, and within the National Police Service in particular, lead to improved service delivery; professionalism; accountability; and ability to address the security needs of Kenyans. We are working in and among 13 communities in Kenya across seven counties. The focus of this work is at the national as well as local level. We are working to ensure that the National Police Service Standing Orders and Regulations, currently being developed by the Inspector General’s Office, include key guidelines on accountability and professionalism among police officers. This includes the use of force and firearms, community policing implementation, and human rights – feeding in key technical expertise to those drafting the regulations.
Saferworld
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Usalama Reforms Forum
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
413838
492525
1484289
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
115311
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2014
Saferworld
168564
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
232000
Incoming Funds from the Donor from January to March 2014
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
257635
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
578190
Saferworld
73956
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
517244
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
234890
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
205183
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
80721
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
144823
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
87549
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
88711
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2014
Saferworld
87783
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2014
Saferworld
96018
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-DutchMFA-FAE
website
GB-CHC-1043843-ZivikYemen_2012
Saferworld
Empowering young people to advocate for inclusive transitional and political processes in Yemen
This project aimed to give voice and agency to young women and men involved in conflict transformation and peacebuilding, and to ensure a more inclusive transition process in Yemen that is responsive to the needs and concerns of young people. We provided research and advocacy trainings to youth activists to strengthen their capacities to engage with decision makers and international actors. We also developed stronger, more encompassing and inclusive informal youth networks across Yemen and increased youth’s access to and influence on Yemeni policy makers and international actors.
Saferworld
Zivik
Saferworld
Resonate Yemen
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
124038.29
129971.75
Zivik
Saferworld
129971.75
Zivik
Saferworld
129971.75
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-ZIVIK-HAK
website
GB-CHC-1043843-ECKyrgyzstan_D001
Saferworld
Empowering civil society actors in Kyrgyzstan to contribute to policing and other security issues
In Kyrgyzstan, we are working to call for changes in the way that security is provided. We have established the ‘Civic Union for Reform and Results’ (CURR), a coalition of 24 civil society organisations, former police officers, journalists and researchers on police reform from all regions of Kyrgyzstan. Its priority is to focus on progressive changes in the law enforcement system through promoting the ideas of the civil union and the views of the population through reform of the Interior Ministry of Kyrgyzstan. Through CURR’s campaigning, government agencies have started to consider the views of civil society on police reform. CURR has assessed the needs and problems related to policing identified by local people during consultations, and is now working with local people and authorities to promote progressive changes in the law enforcement system.
Saferworld
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
Free Generation’ – the Liberal Youth Alliance (LYA)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
100429
100429
2306
Saferworld
92960
Saferworld
92960
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
23967
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
200858
Average Exchange Rate
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
90648
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
17250
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
16358
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
19655
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
40299
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
2550
Saferworld
2763
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-EUKyrgyz-DAC
website
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOCentralAsia_B001
Saferworld
Community security and conflict prevention in the Ferghana Valley Phase III
We are developing inclusive approaches to community security in the Ferghana Valley. We work in two contexts: with communities living in the border areas between Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan; and with Kyrgyz and Uzbek communities in the Osh and Jalalabad areas. Our work brings together communities from different ethnicities encouraging constructive co-operation on local security issues between residents, authorities and law enforcement agencies. From this experience we are developing practical, evidence-based policy recommendations to feed into wider debates on community security effectiveness, linking our community work with national policy changes.
Saferworld
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Youth Development Initiatives (MIR)
Saferworld
Association for Scientific and Technological Intelligentsia (ASTI)
Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
136576
146576
157669
39250
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
50634
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
60692
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
21277
Uk Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
83965
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
21093
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
48117
Cumulative incoming funds received in Q3 of 2014/2015
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
46264
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
29714
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
409728
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
39250
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
13268
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
28106
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
11606
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
2670
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
28247
Saferworld
20479
Saferworld
53626
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
62972
Saferworld
10000
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
55959
Saferworld
16581
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
20655
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
36560
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
68556
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
43262
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOCA-BDC
website
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOCaucasus_B003
Saferworld
Community-based approaches to security in conflict-prone areas of the Caucasus
In this project we have established community-safety networks in very different contexts – along the divide between Shida Kartli and South Ossetia, within South Ossetia itself and in the eastern part of Abkhazia. In each context, we map community security needs, identify priorities and plan solutions together with members of the community. We have established community-led mechanisms to map trends in perceptions of security and to provide early warning of likely increases in tensions. In the latest phase of our project we have also focused on bringing together community representatives with government representatives and local authorities, giving people a voice to air their problems and building relationships.
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
175857
175857
175856
43845
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
66407
Saferworld
51405
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
74391
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
527570
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
151010
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
30006
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
35094
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
138932
Saferworld
141819
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
51405
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
87487
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
24399
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
37574
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
46687
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
43845
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
30834
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOGeorgia-BGB
GB-CHC-1043843-ECSomalia_D003_D015_D019_N032
Saferworld
Strengthening the participation of Somali NSAs in decision-making on peace, security and development (Phases 2-5)
Saferworld has been working since 2004 to strengthen the participation and influence of Somali NSAs in key decision-making processes on peace, security, and development. This phase of the project aims to support the platforms to independently engage in policy dialogue with Somali authorities and the international community on a range of issues, and also to influence key policy and decision-making processes. Specifically, Strengthening the Participation of Somali Non-State Actors in Decision-Making on Peace, Security and Development – Phase 5 is a continuation of previous EU support to Saferworld and the three (NSAPs): South Central Non-State Actors (SOSCENSA), Puntland Non-State Actors Association (PUNSAA), and Somaliland Non-State Actors Forum (SONSAF), and seeks to support the three Non-State Actor Platforms in two key areas: institutional capacity development and policy advocacy on target issues. The project to enable the Platforms to influence governance and statebuilding policy and practice to enable it to better meet community needs.
The overall objective of the action is to ensure governance processes in Somalia and Somaliland have greater transparency, accountability and increased civil society and community participation. The specific objective of the action is to support the three Non-State Actor Platforms (NSAPs) are organisationally and financially sustainable, and continue to influence policy change at the local, national and international levels. Which in turn will help contribute to deepening peace, improving security and establishing democratic governance through the effective participation of Non-State Actors in peace-building and state-building.” This action has six expected results, tailored to the specific needs of each NSAP. The results are clustered around two result areas, the first relating to institutional capacity development and the second related to policy advocacy on target issues: 1.1 SONSAF has increased capacity in fundraising, grant management and monitoring, evaluation and learning, and has diversified its funding sources. 2.1 SONSAF has contributed to improved transparency and accountability of key state institutions, targeting the extractives, natural resource management, public financial management (PFM) and justice sectors. 1.2 PUNSAA has increased capacity in procurement, financial management, human resources, fundraising and monitoring, evaluation and learning. 2.2 PUNSAA has successfully influenced Puntland’s PFM legislation, and the implementation of state and national Development Plans. 1.3 SOSCENSA has secured greater participation of its members through decentralisation, increasing engagement with civil society in regional centres, and has strengthened institutional sustainability through funding diversification. 2.3 SOSCENSA has facilitated public engagement on governance and civic education issues through public meetings, debates, citizen-government dialogues and other channels.
European Commission - Europe Aid
European Commission - Europe Aid
European Commission - Europe Aid
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
Saferworld
Somali South Central Non-State Actors (SOSCENSA)
Somaliland Non State Actors Forum (SONSAF)
Puntland Non-State Actors' Association (PUNSAA)
Start of Phase 2: 16/04/2012; Start of Phase 3: 16/04/2014; Start of Phase 4: 01/07/2015; Start of Phase 5: 10/07/2017
Start of Phase 2
End of Phase 3
End of Phase 4
End of Phase 5
Saferworld
Feysal Osman
Funding Officer
fosman@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk
886475
886475
743193
798127
331835
636452
158019
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
175931
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
-99239
Phase 3 - D015
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
778573
Phase 4 - D019
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
197668
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
82581
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
337835
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
201011
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
1772950
Phase 2 (16/04/2012-31/03/2014) - D003
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
626940
Phase 3 - D015
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
91693
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
26618
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
224865
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
16513
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
284680
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
Expenditure and disbursements to local partners from April to June 2016
636452
Phase 5 (10/07/2017-09/07/2018) -
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
219704
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2017
166277
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2016
357347
Phase 4 - D019
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
190109
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
Expenditures and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2016
227639
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
101927
Phase 3 - D015
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
1050287
Phase 4 - D019
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
1129962
Phase 4 (01/07/2015-31/12/2016) - D019
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
63044
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
13305
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
188257
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
106109
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
145461
Phase 2 - D003
Saferworld
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
743193
Phase 3 (16/04/2014-15/04/2015) - D015
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
856903.36
Phase 2 - D003
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
100
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
12362
Phase 3 - D015
Saferworld
8691
Phase 4 - D019
Saferworld
32424
Phase 5 - N032
Saferworld
186030
Phase 5 - N032
Saferworld
518070
Phase 5 - N032
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
website
Strengthening the participation of Somali Non-State Actors in decision-making on peace, security and development - Towards Sustainability (Phase 2)
Strengthening the participation of Somali Non-State Actors in decision-making on peace, security and development (Phase 3)
27 position papers produced through consultations and/or research
This output relates to result 2 of the program which is deigned to support the platforms conduct consultations on policy and practice around key governance issues at both the federal and state level, supporting the development and application of new legislation, polices or acts.
More than 12 government policies or practices changed/influenced through advocacy on key areas such as: - Public Financial Management (PFP) - National Development Plans (NDP) - Justice and Human Rights - Elections and - NGO bill More than 503 direct beneficiaries of which 28% female were reached through various project activities. Thousands more Somalia/land communities benefited from the changes in government policies, legislations or practices.
These outputs relate to the first result focusing on institutional capacity development Where the project will implement Platform-specific activities, these vary considerably according to each Platform’s institutional needs and governance context. These involve building fundraising and grant management capacities whilst sustaining core institutional governance requirements, such as Board of Directors meetings and membership engagement and capacitation through technical training on areas including fundraising, grant management, human resource (HR) management and performance management capabilities with a view to strengthening staff retention, development and progression.
Supported/facilitated 7 BOD meetings and conducted platform specific audits
xxx
20 platform staff trained on fundraising and grant management
19 policy positions developed through consultations r research
Developed/reviewed procurement, financial and human resource manuals/policies for NSA platforms
xx
More than 12 government policies or practices changed/influenced through advocacy on key areas such as, Public Financial Management (PFP), National Development Plans (NDP), Justice and Human Rights, Constitutional Review, Elections and NGO bill
xx
More than 503 direct beneficiaries of which 28% female were reached through various project activities. Thousands more Somalia/land communities benefited from the changes in government policies, legislations or practices.
xx
7 concept notes/proposals developed to help diversify the platforms' funding sources
xxx
GB-CHC-1043843-ECChina_D004
Saferworld
Council decision 2012/121/CFSP in support of activities to promote EU-China-Africa dialogue and co-operation on conventional arms control
The primary aim of the project is to facilitate dialogue that contributes to meaningful EU-China-Africa co-operative actions that address the threats associated with the proliferation of conventional arms, focusing on SALW controls and the UN ATT process. Working with China Arms Control and Disarmament Association (CACDA), China Institutes of Contemporary China Studies (CICIR), Chinese People’s Association on Peace and Disarmament (CPAPD), Tsinghua University (Beijing), Tongji University (Shanghai), Africa Peace Forum (APFO – Nairobi) , the project is creating sustainable networks and forums, increasing awareness and engagement by the policy community, and supporting joint research.
Saferworld
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
China Arms Control and Disarmament Association (CACDA)
Africa Peace Forum (APFO)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Worldwide
307915
522085
-11138
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
82653
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
460304
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
830000
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
4350
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
115042
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
138439
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
246332
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
155516
Saferworld
112113
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to November 2013
Saferworld
85759
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
189208
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-EUCODUN-DFN
website
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOMENA_B002
Saferworld
Strengthening women's public voice in Egypt, Libya and Yemen
In 2012, Saferworld began a regional project looking at how safety and security concerns in Egypt, Libya and Yemen impact women’s public participation. In the first phase of the project, we have conducted research with women activists with diverse backgrounds in each country to better understand the threats to their safety, how insecurity is preventing them from participating in decision-making, and how women are responding to these problems. Our work also seeks to support women from across the region to engage in policy dialogue on security issues, participate in political processes and form initiatives to address local security and safety concerns. We have formed a regional network of women activists called ‘Sawtana Kawatuna’ in order to facilitate dialogue and lesson-sharing between Egypt, Libya, Yemen and other MENA countries.
Saferworld
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Nazra for Feminist Studies
Voices for Libyan Women
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
216892
218427
53733
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
7661
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
38732
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
132615
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
150754
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
59059
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
35965
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
38732
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
93882
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
7661
Saferworld
53555
Saferworld
148195
Saferworld
435319
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
53554
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOMENA-BFL
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA_F002-F005_24349
Saferworld
Improving conditions for reconstruction and development in Bangladesh, South Sudan and Yemen
The aim of the project is to contribute to an improved environment for reconstruction and development in Bangladesh, South Sudan and Yemen. It sets out to do this by creating more active, informed and inclusive societies, and more effective and accountable institutions – in turn increasing public safety and security.;
Saferworld
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Organisation for Children Harmony (TOCH)
The Kuac Area Development Agency (KUADA)
BRAC International
National Organisation for Development of Society (NODS)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
499326
1162476
1160398
1162268
674962
351207
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
363246
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
671
Saferworld
7467
Saferworld
-15538
Saferworld
424573
Saferworld
4015
Saferworld
1487744
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
575683
Saferworld
191295
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 201
Saferworld
341177
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
333274
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
279803
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
274792
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
1231948
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
301724
Saferworld
326534
Saferworld
265475
Saferworld
363324
Saferworld
264131
Saferworld
609272
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
1188276
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
4659430
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
135613
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA-FB*
website
GB-CHC-1043843-OSI_N002
Saferworld
Conflict sensitive engagement in South Sudan: China's role
This project aimed to encourage Chinese policy and engagement in South Sudan to be more conflict-sensitive and open to dialogue with civil society. It delivered a series of meetings and workshops in Beijing and Juba that introduce the concept of conflict sensitivity to a broad range of Chinese actors, including officials, state-owned banks, state-owned and private commercial actors, academics and researchers. The project also promoted people-centred approaches to security through facilitating dialogue between the above-mentioned Chinese actors and South Sudanese civil society. Furthermore, the project created forums to bring together Chinese policy makers and researchers, South Sudanese officials and civil society, officials from regional and Western governments and international NGOs. Lastly, the project supported field research in South Sudan by the Chinese researchers.
Foundation Open Society Institute
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
43293.35
43293.65
86586.7
Foundation Open Society Institute
Saferworld
28913
Expenditure from September 2012 to March 2013
Saferworld
37948
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
41945.8
Foundation Open Society Institute
Saferworld
19726
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
44640.9
Foundation Open Society Institute
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-OSI-NCN
website
GB-CHC-1043843-HumanityUnited_N003
Saferworld
Conflict sensitive engagement in South Sudan: China's role
At a policy level we are bringing together high-level Chinese and South Sudanese stakeholders in government, the corporate sector, and civil society, to promote conflict sensitive approaches to China-South Sudan engagement. Key areas of discussion include small arms control, improving community security and maximising the positive impact of aid on peacebuilding. We are facilitating on-going discussions between high level policymakers in both Beijing and Juba.
Humanity United
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
18441.46
25818.54
10087
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
16144
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
44259.5
Humanity United
Saferworld
18029
Expenditure from September 2012 to March 2013
Saferworld
44259.5
Humanity United
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-OSI-NCN
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDASouthSudan_E002
Saferworld
Support to South Sudan Programme 2012 - 2014
With this project Saferworld wants to contribute to an improved environment for reconstruction and development by increasing public safety and security through more active, informed and inclusive societies and more effective and accountable state institutions, and by ensuring that national and international development actors working in these contexts incorporate conflict-sensitive approaches into their policy and practice.;
Saferworld
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
The Organisation for Children Harmony (TOCH)
The Kuac Area Development Agency (KUADA)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
201805
201804
16817
420425.51
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
39329
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
34779
Saferworld
47761
Saferworld
27674
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
43461
Saferworld
162
Saferworld
233582
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
36160
Saferworld
46695
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
186844
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
43579
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
33469
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
15746
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 in 2914/2015
Saferworld
51611
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDAS.Sudan-EBI
website
GB-CHC-1043843-ECKosovo_D005
Saferworld
Empowering CSOs in Kosovo to become effective contributors to security policy and decision making processes
Our 18-month joint project with Saferworld, Forum for Civic Initiatives (FIQ), and AKTIV, financed by the European Union, is focussed on “Empowering CSOs in Kosovo to become effective contributors to security policy and decision making.” We are building the research and advocacy capacities of local CSOs in Kosovo, so that they can work in municipalities to undertake high quality research, with the intention of influencing security policies to respond to the concerns of local people on key peace, security, and conflict related issues.
Saferworld
Saferworld
European Commission - EuropeAid
Forum for Civic Initiatives (FIQ)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
135073
67537
83380
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
46162
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
2185
Saferworld
5162
Saferworld
31582
Saferworld
103114
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
27077
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
36476
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
28134
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
38442
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
202610
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
16116
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
-12610
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-EU Kosovo-DGD
website
GB-CHC-1043843-ZivikYemen_H006
Saferworld
Amplifying Youth Voices in Yemen's Transition
In this project we supported young women and men in Yemen to ensure their voices were heard by policy makers during the transition period. The project had three main components: research into young people’s perceptions and priorities for Yemen’s political transition, which informed evidence-based advocacy; strengthening the advocacy skills of select youth leaders and helping them develop stronger, more inclusive networks across Yemen; and building constructive relationships between youth leaders and Yemeni decision-makers so that young people could bring their concerns, insight and experiences to bear on political decisions.
Saferworld
Saferworld
Zivik
Riwaa Youth Development Foundation
Youth Development Organisation
Resonate Yemen
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
100556
23934
This payment referes to the previous Financial Year
Zivik
Saferworld
16541
Zivik
Saferworld
29613
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
50842
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
100556
Zivik
Saferworld
59580
Zivik
Saferworld
20884
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
-1284
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-ZivikYemen-HGK
website
GB-CHC-1043843-PACTNepal_I001
Saferworld
Sajhedari Bikass: Partnership for Local Development
The goal of this project is to ensure that targeted communities better direct local development. In order to achieve this objective the targeted communities will have the knowledge, skills and abilities to identify and access financial resources to fund local development activities that the communities themselves have identified in an inclusive and participatory manner. Further, the targeted communities will have the knowledge, skills and abilities to manage, implement, and provide for operations and maintenance of small-scale development activities. The targeted communities will also have access to appropriate community stabilization initiatives, which will focus on addressing drivers of conflict and establishing an enabling environment for community development. Finally, new local government units in the targeted communities will possess the KSAs to function effectively.
USAID
Pact
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
42424
42424
42424
12375
17714.8
Sum of incoming funds received in July 2014
Pact
Saferworld
9352
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to February 2015
Pact
Saferworld
139647
Pact
Saferworld
7658
Pact
Saferworld
16430
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
16390
Saferworld
6320
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
3183
Saferworld
5763
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
18379
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
12089
Saferworld
10928
Saferworld
273
Saferworld
-1521
Saferworld
2676
Pact
Saferworld
5213
Pact
Saferworld
1363
Pact
Saferworld
1703
Pact
Saferworld
18298
Pact
Saferworld
41351.8
PACT
Saferworld
5470
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
21478
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
14901
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
24753
Cumulative donations received in Q3 of 2014/2015
Pact
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-PACTNepal-IAP
website
GB-CHC-1043843-USAIDNepal_I002
Saferworld
Community initiatives for common understanding in Nepal
The program brings together conflicting groups within communities, including male and female former combatants, through a people-to-people (P2P) approach to local development and community peacebuilding linked to existing dispute resolution mechanisms. By creating opportunities for structured interaction between conflicting groups around shared local concerns, the program supports the building of trust and more resilient social ties across divided communities.
Saferworld
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Child Workers in Nepal Concerned Centre (CWIN)
Informal Sector Service Center (INSEC)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
305521
426651
407328
1139500
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
30585
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
224351
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
68622
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
60619
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
267593
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
45000
Saferworld
873
Saferworld
97890
Saferworld
3508
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
15738
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
76265
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2014
Saferworld
76243
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
68688
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
110502
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
51104
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
51717
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
66477
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
62416
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
69108
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
64316
Saferworld
55567
Saferworld
82337
Saferworld
101473
Saferworld
517631
Saferworld
69251
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USAID Nepal-ICP
website
GB-CHC-1043843-DFID_A003_A007
Saferworld
Post 2015 - Advocacy with Emerging Powers (Phase I and II)
The purpose of this project is to conduct research and support dialogue on the inclusion of conflict and violence issues in the post-2015 development framework, engaging a range of policy communities and actors, including rising powers and traditional donor countries, multilateral actors and other global stakeholders both at the country level and among decision makers in New York.
Saferworld
Saferworld
Centre on International Cooperation (CIC)
Department for International Development
Phase 1: 1 July 2013 - 31 March 2014 Phase 2: 1 December 2014 - 30 June 2015
Phase 1: 1 July 2013 - 31 March 2014 Phase 2: 1 December 2014 - 30 June 2015
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Worldwide
195000
149000
59805
A003 - Phase I
Department for International Development
Saferworld
149000
A007 - Phase II
Department for International Development
Saferworld
11872
A007 - Phase II
Saferworld
11872
A007 - Phase II
Department for International Development
Saferworld
77347
A007 - Phase II
Saferworld
54915
A007 - Phase II
Saferworld
4174
A003 - Phase I
Saferworld
96547
A003 - Phase I: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
32105
Department for International Development
Saferworld
22809
A007 - Phase II
Department for International Development
Saferworld
85144
A003 - Phase I
Department for International Development
Saferworld
195000
A003 - Phase I
Department for International Development
Saferworld
4174
A003 - Phase I
Department for International Development
Saferworld
77348
A007 - Phase II
Department for International Development
Saferworld
5309
A007 - Phase II
Department for International Development
Saferworld
5309
A007 - Phase II
Saferworld
45729
A003 - Phase I
Department for International Development
Saferworld
56087
A003 - Phase I: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
38044
A003 - Phase I: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDpost2015-ADS
website
GB-CHC-1043843-DFID_A004_201898-103
Saferworld
Conflict, Crime and Violence Results Initiative (CCVRI) Helpdesk
Saferworld is proposing to provide written advice to DfID as a new member of the Conflict, Crime and Violence Results Initiative (CCVRI). Over the period September 2013 to May 2014, Saferworld will provide DfID with high quality, bespoke written advice from our leading international expert staff and associates in response to requests from DfID country offices on themes related to conflict, crime and violence results. Saferworld will also provide written reports in areas of potential interest to DfID drawn from a menu of supply-side tasks. This proposal would enable Saferworld indicatively to respond to ten on-demand requests and complete four supply side products for DfID in the project period.
Saferworld
Department for International Development
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
122258.88
34931.11
157190
Department for International Development
Saferworld
28890
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2014
Saferworld
793
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 of 2014/2015
Saferworld
35734
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
34997
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
29287
Department for International Development
Saferworld
71126.82
Sum of incoming funds received in September
Department for International Development
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDhelpdesk-AFS
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SwedishMFA_E003
Saferworld
Addressing conflict and violence in the post-2015 development framework
The purpose of this project is to conduct research and support dialogue on the inclusion of conflict and violence issues in the post-2015 development framework, engaging a range of policy communities and actors, including rising powers and traditional donor countries, multilateral actors and other global stakeholders both at the country level and among decision makers in New York.
Saferworld
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Worldwide
101078.21
181940.79
283019
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
10185
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from November to December 2013
Saferworld
60669
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2014
Saferworld
154595
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
278116
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
9900
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
42767
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDApost2015-ADS
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsEmbassySouthSudan_F006_25564
Saferworld
Contribution to Community Policing and Community Security Programme in South Sudan
Through this programme, Saferworld seeks to work alongside and add value to the Safety and Access to Justice Programme (SAJP) police service delivery work.
Enabling communities, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and other actors to engage more effectively with the South Sudan National Police Service (SSNPS) and other authorities to improve safety and security and experience a reduction in threats.
The Organisation for Children Harmony (TOCH)
Saferworld
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Kuac Area Development Agency (KUADA)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
1509009
1509010
125751
645861
3143770
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
645861
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
591167
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
34012
Saferworld
921
Saferworld
-169586
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
82721
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
711158
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
216019
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
339618
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
812953
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
1554963
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
321704
Saferworld
360763
Saferworld
599590
Saferworld
291015
Saferworld
423467
Saferworld
830825
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-DutchEmbassySSudan-FCI
website
GB-CHC-1043843-EC_C4P_D007-D013
Saferworld
Capacities for Peace
In contexts where overall in-country analytical capacity is lower, the project will focus on building the in-country skills base and creating opportunities for in-country and/or regional engagement between civil society and other relevant stakeholders, including EU Delegation(s). This will include identifying key gaps in existing analysis, seeking out under-represented perspectives and innovative approaches at local, national and regional levels and tailoring the actions to take advantage of opportunities to engage in the most strategic way.
Saferworld
Saferworld
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Conciliation Resources
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Worldwide
635631
635631
264848
1536110
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
631251
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
492785
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
275984
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
163355
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
184870
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
156719
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
150031
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2015
Saferworld
91327
Saferworld
155866
Saferworld
243918
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
32981
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from September to December 2013
Saferworld
139502
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
81451
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-ECC4P-DK*
website
GB-CHC-1043843-DAIKenya_P005
Saferworld
Building Responsive Institutions through Conflict Sensitive Approaches to Development
This project aims to support institution building in Kenya through conflict-sensitive approaches.
Saferworld
Isiolo Peace Link (Isiolo County)
Local Capacities for Peace International (Kisumu County)
DAI
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
400000
94124
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to February 2015
Saferworld
6578
Saferworld
89452
Saferworld
51194
Saferworld
12691
Saferworld
55148
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
116276
DAI
Saferworld
34825
DAI
Saferworld
49789
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
113902
DAI
Saferworld
74872
DAI
Saferworld
32899
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
52000
DAI
Saferworld
400000
DAI
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-ESRC_N006
Saferworld
Rising Powers and Conflict Management in Central Asia
This project seeks to develop a more global perspective in conflict prevention and peacebuilding work by examining the implications of rising powers in conflicted and fragile countries.
Exeter University
Saferworld
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
31758
31758
31758
31758
57397
Saferworld
95739
Exeter University
Saferworld
4860
Exeter University
Saferworld
6186
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
12012
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
987
Exeter University
Saferworld
12030
Exeter University
Saferworld
11796
Exeter University
Saferworld
1620
Cumulative incoming funds received in Q3 in 2014/2015
Exeter University
Saferworld
2916
Saferworld
127032
Exeter University
Saferworld
1944
Saferworld
387
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
968
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
2245
Saferworld
2134
Saferworld
12014
Saferworld
5003
Saferworld
12030
Saferworld
9440
Saferworld
1938
Saferworld
418
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-IDRC_N010
Saferworld
Promoting inclusive, accountable and legitimate political settlements in Africa
This project provides Kenyan perspectives on a critical element of peacebuilding and state-building, namely the role of security and justice provision in political settlements. It is framed around the following research questions: “What does Kenya's National Accord teach us about how to address security and justice issues within a political settlement in ways that reinforce the overall settlement and contribute to a reduction in violence? What has been done to strengthen public support for the Accord’s security and justice commitments since the Accord was originally reached, and how have these commitments been implemented?”
Saferworld
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
159134
159133
70197
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
36511
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
52175
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
20073
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
64807
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
318267
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
110101
International Development Research Centre
Saferworld
25664
Saferworld
18706
Saferworld
1318
Saferworld
30230
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
18973
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
11654
Saferworld
21100
Saferworld
18699
Saferworld
77906
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA_F007_25913
Saferworld
Addressing conflict and violence in the post-2015 development framework
The purpose of this project is to conduct research and support dialogue on the inclusion of conflict and violence issues in the post-2015 development framework, engaging a range of policy communities and actors, including rising powers and traditional donor countries, multilateral actors and other global stakeholders both at the country level and among decision makers in New York.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
74152
74152
8305
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
34999
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
13689
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
148305
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
105000
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
32277
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
26175
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
1900
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
72568
Saferworld
1695
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-ECSomalia_D014
Saferworld
Building Foundations for Political Reconciliation in Jubaland (Som VII)
The overall objective is “to enable Somali Non State Actors to engage and address the causes of conflict (e.g. contested notions of the state) and improve inclusive, transparent and accountable governance at all levels through national reconciliation” and the Specific Objective is “to support NSAs in South Central Somalia to engage in research and advocacy with authorities in the newly recovered areas, specifically in Jubaland, and the Federal Government on issues related to reconciliation and stabilisation.”
Saferworld
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
Jubaland
382108
417874
201004
Match Funding
Saferworld
598978
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
252996
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
286084
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
128939
Saferworld
160664
Saferworld
18975
Saferworld
6911
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
16110
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
56447
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
149397
Saferworld
152276
Saferworld
26576
Saferworld
-10732
Saferworld
-13834
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-OxfamNovib_M002_M003
Saferworld
International perspectives and peace and reconciliation in Somalia
The overall objective of the project is “to enable Somali Non State Actors (NSAs) to engage and address the causes of conflict (e.g. contested notions of the state) and improve inclusive, transparent and accountable governance at all levels through national reconciliation.” The specific objectives of the project are: to support NSAs in Somalia to engage in research and advocacy with authorities in the newly ‘recovered’ areas, specifically in Jubaland, and the Federal Government on issues related to reconciliation and stabilisation; and to deepen the understanding of Turkey’s engagement in Somalia, Somaliland & Puntland and its impact on conflict dynamics.
Saferworld
Oxfam Novib
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
122374
60471
60471
M003 - Phase 2
Oxfam Novib
Saferworld
35894
M003 - Phase 2: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q3 2014/2015
Saferworld
49331
M003 - Phase 2: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2015
Saferworld
11337
M003 - Phase 2: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q1 2014/2015
Saferworld
60471
M003 - Phase 2
Oxfam Novib
Saferworld
122374
M002 - Phase 1
Oxfam Novib
Saferworld
122374
M002 - Phase 1
Oxfam Novib
Saferworld
16125
M002 - Phase 1
Saferworld
175
M002 - Phase 1
Saferworld
4101
M002 - Phase 1
Saferworld
96
M002 - Phase 1
Saferworld
22752
M003 - Phase 2
Saferworld
2216
M003 - Phase 2
Saferworld
2930
M003 - Phase 2
Saferworld
37888
M003 - Phase 2: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners in Q2 2014/2015
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOYemen_B009
Saferworld
Supporting momentum for gender-sensitive security sector reform in Yemen
The project seeks to address gender-sensitive security sector reforms by a) establishing a forum where civil society activists and lower-level government representatives come together to better understand concepts of gender-sensitive security provision and develop tailored recommendations to feed into security sector policy processes and b) piloting some participatory / interactive research and discussion activities designed to generate more information and discussion around community-level perceptions of the role of the police in addressing women’s security concerns.
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
www.saferworld.org.uk
133760
100286
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
50441
Saferworld
49845
Saferworld
133760
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
website
Supporting momentum for gender-sensitive security sector reform in Yemen
GB-CHC-1043843-FinlandMFA_W001
Saferworld
Refocusing small arms interventions on impact: Connecting global policy to community driven approaches to security
Saferworld undertook this two-year programme with local partners in Kenya. The intention is to help communities achieve their rights to security, currently under threat from the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons (SALW), by ensuring that the communities themselves are at the heart of the prioritisation, planning, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of the programme. As well as being of immediate benefit to the ‘target’ communities, by developing credible evidence from these practical efforts the programme also intends to inform national and international processes, particularly within the context of the UN Programme of Action (UNPoA) on SALW.
Security Research and Information Center (SRIC)
SIKOM Peace and Development Network
Isiolo Peace Working Group
Saferworld
Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
296219
296219
74707
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2014
Saferworld
67074
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2014
Saferworld
78808
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2014
Saferworld
69462
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to February 2015
Saferworld
252519
Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
592438
Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
293265
Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
59618
Saferworld
55721
Saferworld
78269
Saferworld
62125
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-OSF_N017
Saferworld
Promoting and Facilitating China’s Conflict Sensitive Engagement in South Sudan
The overall objective of the project is to contribute to an improved environment for economic and social development in South Sudan by encouraging Chinese policy, economic and development actors’ engagement in South Sudan to be more conflict-sensitive and open to dialogue with civil society.
Foundation to Promote Open Society
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
98945
108087
207032
Foundation to Promote Open Society
Saferworld
16850
Saferworld
25269
Saferworld
108087
Foundation to Promote Open Society
Saferworld
98945
Foundation to Promote Open Society
Saferworld
20730
Saferworld
13441
Saferworld
25754
Saferworld
29086
Saferworld
22651
Saferworld
18097
Saferworld
35154
Saferworld
23
Saferworld
website
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA_F013_29438
Saferworld
Building Constituencies for Peaceful Change
Reduced violence and improved physical security / freedom from fear
Saferworld
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The programme aims to contribute to addressing root causes of conflict and instability focusing on civil society at local and national levels as proactive participants in improving human security and social cohesion. It aims to bridge divides between groups through inclusive local-level actions for peace and conflict transformation.
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
The Graystone Centre 28 Charles Square London, N1 6HT United Kingdom
1198175
1403908
1527236
1054030
1039593
6222942
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Output 3.2.1 Comparative analysis is made available to national level civil society actors
Context analysis
3.2.1 # of civil society actors that receive context analysis reports
Count of people who are part of the national level civil society group and have received context analysis
An additional 189 subscribers to an advocacy listserv also received the context analysis updates, totaling 243 in Q2. In Quarter 2 (July to September 2017) an additional 65 civil society actors participated in discussions on select topics related to the context analysis developed during the June 2017 civil society actor meeting. Discussions on the impact of national and international collaboration between civil society actors were held with a view of improving coordination and collaboration between civil society. A paper on the impact of regional and international collaboration was developed and shared with eight civil society actors. Discussions were also held with three parliamentarians. The discussions centered on exploring their views on constitution making, access to health and addressing violence against women. The discussions are informing advocacy campaigns and messages planned by the program that will target parliamentarians.
An additional five civil society actors than targeted participated in and received context analysis during a civil society actors meeting held in this period. More actors participated to allow for a diverse range of views to be heard.
Civil society actors are provided with regular context analysis and updates to facilitate coordination and enable joint action
Outcome 1: Local communities and civil society (including vulnerable groups such as women, youth, refugees, and IDPs) build local social cohesion, and work together to improve human security in their local areas.
This outcome aims to track transformation of local drivers of conflict and poverty as a result of empowering individuals, civil society actors and communities to take collective action to break cycles of violence and poverty
RA1.SG2. Percent of conflicts that are addressed and resolved by community action groups (CAGs) that are supported by the programme
Beneficiaries are the community action groups - a group of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities - who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the programme. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. Special attention will need to be given to conflicts that are brought to the CAGs in a reactive manner vs those the CAG chooses to work on through the PAR process. The conflict log will account for this variation. ‘Conflicts’ refers to clashing of opposed interests, such as a crime, human rights violation, misdemeanor, civil dispute over land, commercial or family interests, personal status, employment, inheritance, etc. ‘Addressed and resolved’ refers to a situation in which a community structure has dealt with or discussed a conflict* and has subsequently settled that conflict according to the parties involved in the conflict.
Year 1 has focused on laying the foundations for implementation of activities under Outcome 1, including completing the Community Level Assessments (CLAs), identifying implementation locations and selecting partners. Early on in Year 1 the project team understood there would be need to review the proposed timeline of activities and give priority focus to undertaking the CLAs and related sensitisation and relationship building activities. This included providing enough time to secure the right project team members to participate in the CLAs (and future project interventions). These changes were communicated to the Netherlands MFA. Further delays in completing the CLAs, largely the result of security issues and challenges with permissions, has meant some delays to activities related to the outcome; additionally, a project team review held in October 2017 identified that a more strategic and risk adverse approach to implementation would be to roll out the Community Correspondent System (CCS) in all the identified locations prior to setting up Community Action Groups (CAGs).
The focus in the second year has been on expanding on and creating opportunities for coordination and collaboration among diverse groups of people through various avenues including dialogue. Findings indicate a range of issues across communities that contribute to insecurity and present barriers to social cohesion, and initial reports indicate that, given the space to do so, communities eagerly jointly identify clear actions to address these issues.
Indicator RA1.SG.4: Percent of programme beneficiaries that report they have the capacity to influence formal and/or informal human security authorities
Programme beneficiaries refers to members of community action groups (CAGS), surrounding communities served by the CAGs and members of civil society organizations directly targeted by the programme. The project will monitor the indicator; however the project does not have any direct activities that will contribute to its achievement. This indicator is being monitored under Outcome 1 but has the potential to be relevant to Outcome 2. However under this programme none of the programme beneficiaries will receive direct support to build their capacity to influence formal and informal authorities. Programme beneficiaries targeted under Outcome 2 will receive direct support to build their capacity to influence national platforms (which do not necessarily include authorities), programme beneficiaries targeted under Outcome 1 may indirectly have the opportunity to interact with and build relationships with local authorities. ‘the capacity to influence’ refers to the perception of respondents, i.e. to what extent they feel they are capable and effective in their efforts towards policy influencing, lobbying and advocacy. ‘Formal and informal human security authorities’ refers to those bodies from the security sector that are targeted through the programme (e.g. the local police and/or a community security mechanisms ) , NOT the entire security sector.
There is improvement in relationships between local authorities and communities-a case in point where in one community, community members formed a committee to advocate to local authorities to improve social services. This is significant because the community had not had interaction with local authorities before because they did not have trust in the system and believed that they could not influence authorities. Communities have also initiated campaigns to address social problems for example; a campaign was implemented by a community in response to a disease outbreak-further evidence of improved cohesion and collaboration.
Sub Outcome 2:2: Regional civil society working groups collectively plan, facilitate and implement conflict- and gender-sensitive initiatives, informed by priorities and lessons identified at local level.
This outcome will track collaboration efforts between citizens, civil society and local authorities (where appropriate) on issues of common concern and creation of linkages between local- and national-level processes of conflict transformation, peacebuilding and social change.
Indicator SO2.2.1: Percent of initiatives implemented by civil society that are informed by local level analysis
According to the OECD DAC, “[CSOs] can be defined to include all non-market and non-state organizations outside of the family in which people organize themselves to pursue shared interests in the public domain. Examples include community-based organizations and village associations, environmental groups, women’s rights groups, farmers’ associations, faith-based organizations, labour unions, co-operatives, professional associations, chambers of commerce, independent research institutes and the not-for-profit media.” CSOs are voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation. The indicator will be a count of all initiatives that are planned for/implemented using evidence from research carried out by civil society or discussions in regional forums
Implementation of Outcome 2 and Sub-Outcome 2.2 are due to commence in Year 2 as originally planned. Changes to the planned approach for this Sub-Outcome are detailed above under Outcome 2. Steps have been taken to lay the foundations for this implementation area including planning a meeting on developing a small grants mechanism to be held in Q2 of Year 2.
While the establishment and convening of regional working groups was delayed to Q4 Y3, small grants and microgrants were disbursed to regional level CSOs and initiatives in fulfillment of this outcome. All the projects and initiatives funded by these small grants and microgrants were informed by local level analysis.
Indicator SO 2.2.2: Number and type of initiatives that are jointly implemented by civil society platforms at regional level
According to the OECD DAC, “[CSOs] can be defined to include all non-market and non-state organizations outside of the family in which people organize themselves to pursue shared interests in the public domain. Examples include community-based organizations and village associations, environmental groups, women’s rights groups, farmers’ associations, faith-based organizations, labour unions, co-operatives, professional associations, chambers of commerce, independent research institutes and the not-for-profit media.” CSOs are voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation. Civil society platforms at regional level refer to loose consortia formed by civil society attending regional platform meetings. The programme will provide small grants to civil society to implement activities that will respond to issues relating to human security that are identified by CAGS and or in regional level meetings. A joint initiative is one that is implemented by two or more members of civil society platforms at regional level
The first regional working group meeting will convene in Q4 Y3 after which joint initiatives are expected to be implemented.
Sub-Outcome 3.2: Advocacy to engage key international targets in policy dialogue influences their position to support opportunities to improve human security
The outcome tracks advocacy efforts by the programme
Indicator 3.2 : Number of regional and international advocacy and policy targets reached
Regional refers to the Africa region and international refers to policy making institutions outside Africa. Regional targets include the African Union while international targets include the European Union. A target will be considered reached if a brief, discussion, meeting has been held with them. This should be informed by an advocacy agenda/plan
Throughout 2017 targeted advocacy actions have taken place in an effort to influence the policy positions of key international targets in relation to conflict transformation in Sudan. Regular analysis of the context, deeper context analyses on thematic issues, on-going consultations and engagements with civil society and other national and international actors and the development of a Sudan Advocacy strategy have all supported targeted advocacy actions at both the national and international levels.
Significant progress has been made towards influencing policy makers at regional and international levels. Throughout 2018 there was regular analysis of the context and ongoing consultations and engagements with civil society. The analysis has provided a platform from which we have been able to undertake targeted advocacy at both the national and international levels. This has included meetings with a wide range of stakeholders including policy makers.
AU, Friends of Sudan, USAID, UN
Output 1.1.2 Community action groups focused on peace and conflict resolution are established and functional
This output falls under outcome 1; sub outcome 1.1. A Community action group is a group of 12-25 people who will be the focal point for participatory action research and resolving community-identified issues
1.1.2 # of CAGS formed
CAGs are groups of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the project. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. This indicator is a count of CAGS created by the project that suit the description above. CAGs will either be newly created structures or will be adapted existing structures. Both will count towards the target.
Activities for this output were scheduled to begin in Q4 of Year 1. Activities related to this output have however been re-scheduled to begin in Q1 of Year 2. The work plan was adjusted to enable establishment of the community communication system in advance of establishment of the community action groups in order to provide more time to build relationships within communities. The target value in YR 2 has been increased by 4 in order to adjust for targets not achieved in YR 1.
Preparatory activities to establish the community action groups are ongoing.
11 out of 12 planned Community Action Groups were formed.
Output 1.2.1 Community action for improved human security stimulated through establishment of community communication system
This output falls under outcome 1; sub outcome 1.2. The community communication system will use short messages sent on mobile phones from CCS correspondents based in communities to the Partner. The messages will provide updates on community issues. The Partner will compile the messages into a report which will be shared during community meetings held at the community level and by the community action groups. Based on this information, community members will discuss and address the issues.
1.2.1 # of community CCS meetings held
The indicator is a count of community meetings that will be convened at community level by CCS correspondents on a monthly basis (to disseminate CCS results).
The activities connected to this output started in Q4 of Yr 1. The CCS handbook has been revised and a CCS system hub has been established. Two training workshops on the CCS system were held for 36 Trainers of Trainers (ToTs). The ToT training has established a pool of trainers as well as correspondents who in the first quarter of year 2 will identify and train additional individuals as community correspondents in the villages where the programme is being implemented. Following identification of the community correspondents, the CCS meetings will begin.
The community correspondent system is now fully operational. Correspondents trained in YR 1 provide weekly updates to the system through short messages. The correspondents provide updates on agreed on themes that include community safety, stability and peace. Monthly reports are then prepared and will be discussed during community monthly gatherings in the next quarter. A total of 51 (24 female, 27 male) community members have been trained and enrolled as correspondents. Village gatherings bringing together a cross section of people to discuss issues identified through the system have been held. During the gatherings, actions to address identified issues are discussed. Between July- September an additional 50 meetings were held, while in October-December, 49 meetings were held bringing the total number of meetings held to 128. In total 3501 (1773 women, 1728 men) people have participated in the meetings through which a number of actions to address safety have been developed.
Village gatherings continued albeit in a limited way due to changes in the context that did not allow for people to hold gatherings for the first two quarters of the year. This picked up in Q3.
Output 2.1.1 Civil society platforms have the skills and knowledge to raise awareness and advocate with national platforms on the impact of national dynamics on local communities
Building capacity of civil society in advocacy and awareness creation will improve their ability to articulate issues raised by local communities to national platforms
2.1.1 % of Civil society platform members that report having increased skills and knowledge to raise awareness and advocate with national platforms
This is a self-reported indicator that will track skills and knowledge as perceived by the recipients of capacity building conducted by the project. Only those civil society members who are directly targeted by the project will self-measure their capacity changes (i.e. members of the civil society platforms).
Activities that contribute to this output will be implemented in Year 2
Activities that contribute to this output will be implemented in Q4 of Y3
Sub-Outcome 1.2: Communities, civil society actors and other state-level actors have access to information feedback loops to promote consultation, cooperation and increase trust
The sub-outcome tracks access to information on conflict issues and the utilisation of the information to address identified issues at the state level
Indicator SO1.2.1: Percent of community issues identified through CCS that are discussed and addressed
The CCS system is an existing system that uses short messages sent through mobile phones to document and report human security issues. The messages are sent by CCS correspondents based in villages to the implementing partner who then collates them into a report that is shared in community action group meetings/discussions. The indicator is a count of issues raised through the CCS system that have been discussed and addressed by CAGs. ‘Addressed and resolved’ refers to a situation in which a community structure has dealt with or discussed a conflict* and has subsequently settled that conflict according to the parties involved in the conflict.
Feedback from the initial ToT training of CCS and partner focal points indicated an appreciation by the participants of the CCS and a recognition of its importance in creating a pool of shared information which can be easily accessed and used at both the individual and community levels. Participants also validated and appended the topics and sub-topics that the system would be used to share information on, thereby giving more relevance to their community information needs. Following a team review meeting , the project partners agreed to adjust the sequencing of planned activities under Outcome 1 (and SO1.1 and SO1.2) to take into account the need to establish relationships and build trust with local communities.
Since Q2 of Year 2, the team has facilitated monthly community gatherings across the programme’s implementation locations. During these gatherings, communities discuss priority issues affecting the community’s stability, as identified through the CCS, and generate ideas for potential community action around some of these priorities.
Indicator SO1.2.2: Number of joint initiatives and statements resulting from state conferences
Conferences bringing together civil society will be held at state level. The conferences will provide an opportunity for information sharing, dialogue, debate and consensus building among civil society on human security issues. The indicator is a count of jointly agreed actions stemming from these conferences. Actions include collaborative efforts to address identified human security issues between two or more civil society members attending the conference. The indicator will not count actions pre-existing the conferences.
State level conferences will take place in Y4. This is due to the changes in the context which prevented this activity from taking place in Y3.
Output 3.2.2 Improved capacity of civil society actors to advocate for change in international policy and practice
Increase in knowledge and skills of civil society actors will contribute to improved ability to advocate for change
3.2.2. % of civil society actors that report having improved capacity to raise awareness and advocate to international policy actors and platforms
This is a self-reported indicator. A criteria on advocacy skills and awareness raising knowledge and skills will be provided to civil society actors to self-assess themselves.
An online poll was conducted with 16 civil society actors who participated in the June civil society actor meeting. All the respondents said that the context updates were useful in their work. This points to the importance of the context updates in raising awareness among civil society actors on issues to prioritise for advocacy at national, regional and international levels.
Sub-Outcome 1.1: Communities and civil society use locally derived analysis to plan and implement local level action plans and initiatives
Communities and civil society have the capacity to generate analysis of conflict issues and use this analysis to implement actions that address identified issues
Indicator SO1.1.1: Percent of CAG action plans and initiatives that incorporate PAR& CCS report findings
A CAG is a group of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities - who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the programme. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. Participatory Action Research will be carried out by the PAR/CCS correspondents on a bi-annual basis in order to identify human security issues that affect the communities. Findings from the research will be shared with the community during discussions that will be led by the CAGS. Action plans and initiatives refer to projects developed by the CAG. This indicator is a count of locally led actions that will be based on priorities identified during the PAR process. The actions should factor in the extent to which conflict sensitivity,gender sensitivity,peace building and gender transformative priorities are addressed
Initial findings from the community level assessments (CLAs) highlighted the need for sustainable, equitable and representative community-level structures to support development, promote cohesion, limit conflict and contribute to stability. Existing community structures fail to represent all members of the community and can be biased and political in nature. The CLAs have also indicated a willingness and clear request by targeted communities for support in identifying and addressing conflict and security issues. Further information will be collected and reported against this Sub-Outcome area in Year 2; activities and outputs that contribute to this sub-outcome commenced in Q4 of Year 1. Any delays in Year 1 as a result of the CLAs are expected to be recovered in Year 2; up to 6 CAGs will be established in Year 2. Related PAR activities will also take place as planned alongside the establishment of CAGs. Indicator figures for the related outputs will be modified to account for this change in implementation timeline and structure.
The formation of Community Action Groups (CAGs) began in Year 2 leading to the formation of seven community action groups. The formation of the groups was preceded by consultations involving representatives from the local administration,farmers, women, youth, IDPs, refugees and CBOs to develop a shared understanding around the CAGs, their role, and processes/guidelines for establishing them. In some areas, existing groups are working with the project to either strengthen or include aspects of safety, security, conflict and gender sensitivity in their existing initiatives.
Indicator SO 1.1.2: Percent of CAG discussions that incorporate PAR&CCS report findings
A CAG is a group of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities - who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the programme. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. Participatory Action Research will be carried out by the CAGS on a bi-annual basis in order to identify human security issues that affect the communities. Findings from the research will be shared with the community during discussions that will be led by the CAGS. Community communication system will use short messaging on mobile phones to pass on information human security issues. The messages will be sent to the partner server who will then compile them into a report that will be shared with the CAGS. Using PAR and CCS information, CAGS will hold periodic discussions to identify responses to identified human security issues. The indicator tracks the use of PAR and CCS information in these discussions .Use of information can be but is not limited to using the information generated through CCS&PAR to start a discussion, including an agenda item that relates to APR/CCS findings, presenting PAR findings and the CCS report to members in order to inform their opinions and suggestions. The indicator only tracks scheduled CAG discussions and does not include adhoc discussions
Indicator SO1.1.3: Percent of targeted civil society report having increased skills and knowledge to support local-level action
According to the OECD DAC, “[CSOs] can be defined to include all non-market and non-state organizations outside of the family in which people organize themselves to pursue shared interests in the public domain. Examples include community-based organizations and village associations, environmental groups, women’s rights groups, farmers’ associations, faith-based organizations, labour unions, co-operatives, professional associations, chambers of commerce, independent research institutes and the not-for-profit media.” CSOs are voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation. This is a self-reported indicator. Skills and Knowledge to be passed on will be determined using a survey administered to civil society group members. Local level action refers to issues on human security, peace building and conflict resolution
Following a review process by the project team and based on learning from implementation, the team held a co-design workshop during which the teams’ understanding around participatory action and research was reviewed, refined and adjusted for contextual relevance. The proposed Participatory Action Research (PAR) was modified to the Participatory Action Learning in Crisis (PALC) approach, a methodology hinged on appreciative inquiry of existing community initiated coping mechanisms and initiatives in response to conflict and crisis.
Sub-Outcome 2.1: Regional civil society working groups are raising awareness and advocating with national platforms on the impact of national dynamics on local communities
The sub-outcome will track joint advocacy efforts by civil society at the regional level (in-country) on identified conflict issues
Indicator SO2.1: Number of awareness and advocacy activities conducted by regional working groups
Regional working groups comprising nominated members of the CAGs, as well as national actors, who engage in dialogue and share information with each other, and with established national level networks will be formed. This indicator is a count of activities carried out by the regional working groups at national level in order to raise awareness on human security issues in the region and or advocate for issues identified in regional working groups.
Instead of creating formal platforms, which consultation and learning from past experiences indicated would present a challenge to sustainability, recipients of small grants will be brought together, alongside additional regional and national civil society, to discuss their grants, share lessons, identify potential priority areas and make connections with one another.
The first regional working group was convened in Q4 2019
Sub- Outcome 3.1: Key national and international civil society actors have a shared vision and approach for building a peaceful, just and democratic country in a more coordinated and strategic manner
The outcome will track coordination and collaboration of civil society actors at national and international levels on priorities and approaches for conflict transformation
Indicator SO 3.1: Number and type of joint initiatives, agreed positions and/or resolutions on conflict transformation by key national and international actors for conflict transformation
Count of activities that are implemented by two or more civil society actors at national level and international level
Significant progress has been made towards achieving this Sub-Outcome area. A total of two civil society actor meetings took place, bringing together 32 civil society actors to discuss key issues related to conflict transformation. Regular coordination between national and international civil society actors led to the creation of four working groups on priority areas; these sub-working groups are a new approach for the civil society actors and are a direct result of the consultations carried out with civil society actors to identify means to increase effectiveness and support more coordinated efforts.
Civil society actors continued to identify opportunities, considerations and options for conflict transformation, leading to more cooperation, and more coordinated and therefore effective action. Some examples include convening meetings between civil society actors to build relationships and commissioning joint research and analysis on political processes.
Output 3.1.1 Revised terms of reference/strategy for national level civil society collaboration in place
This refers to an updated guiding document on national level civil society collaboration
3.1.1 Revised terms of reference/strategy available
The indicator provides evidence of new direction being available for national civil society collaboration
Terms of reference to guide the review process have been produced and circulated for consensus. Once the process has been concluded, this will be reported on in 2018.
The theory of change that guides the process of collaboration was improved, simplified and circulated to contributors.
Activities contributing to this output were completed and achieved in Y2.
Output 2.2.1 CSOs jointly implement projects developed from regional working group discussions
The project will support regional civil society platforms to meet and dialogue with a view of supporting collaboration through development and implementation of joint initiatives
2.2.1 # and type of initiatives that are jointly implemented by civil society platforms at regional level
This is a count of activities or projects implemented by civil society (both formal and informal) that attend and are part of regional platforms supported by the project. The activities will cover a wide-range of topics and approaches/methodologies.
Activities related to this output will begin in Year 2 of the project
Consultation meetings were held with 13 (9 males, 4 males) civil society actors to identify opportunities for civil society collaboration and formation of civil society networks. Based on findings from these meetings, the program will work with civil society actors to implement activities aimed towards improving civil society collaboration and impact.
Civil Society actors from diverse groups organised an initiative aimed at advocating for inclusion of marginalized groups, women and youth in ongoing processes. Through the initiative, a variety of groups and actors were given a platform to raise their concerns and priorities.
Output 1.1.1 Number and type of PAR reports produced and disseminated
This output falls under outcome 1; sub-outcome 1.1. It aims to track the immediate result of local level research conducted by Community Action Group (CAG) members as a result of the Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach. The research will be used to inform local level action plans and initiatives.
1.1.1 # of PAR reports produced and disseminated
PAR refers to participatory action research. This indicator is a count of reports produced and shared with community members by the community action groups. The PAR reports produced may take a number of different formats and will be responsive to the research themes and approaches. Reports will be shared during community meetings/gatherings. Sharing means either providing copies to members or presenting the findings orally.
The activities connected to this output originally were scheduled to begin in Q4 of Year 1 with a target of 4 PAR reports produced. However, they will begin in the second half of year 2 following the completion of the community level assessments (CLA) within the programme implementation areas. Identification of locations, and selection of relevant PAR and CCS facilitators, among others required a detailed understanding of the context. The CLA process has been completed in the target locations, and CCS local level facilitators have been trained to roll out this component gradually. The target value for year 2 has therefore been increased to 9 to include the YR 1 target.
Activities contributing to this output will begin later in the year.
This output is no longer being tracked. Participatory action and research was reviewed, refined and adjusted for contextual relevance. The proposed Participatory Action Research (PAR) was modified to the Participatory Action Learning in Crisis (PALC) approach, a methodology hinged on appreciative inquiry of existing community initiated coping mechanisms and initiatives in response to conflict and crisis. PALC does not have a research report as an output.
Outcome 3: National-level comparative analysis and research informs national, regional and international advocacy messages and cross-border policy recommendations for addressing deficiencies in human security and the root causes of armed conflict, instability, and irregular migration.
This outcome will track the extent to which national, regional and international actors demonstrate awareness of the impact of aid, political and investment frameworks, and the extent to which they review their approaches as a result of research and advocacy by civil society actors
Indicator O3: Number of priorities, messages and decisions of key international and national actors that incorporate civil society analysis and research
Priorities, messages and decisions are defined as actions, statements and policies that are taken by both international and national actors which make reference to priorities, messages and context analysis provided by civil society networks
There have been no changes to this outcome; activities and outputs that contribute to this outcome commenced in Q1 of Year 1. Initial results are beginning to be seen under this outcome. As a result of regular analysis and meetings with key policy and advocacy actors, there are signs of uptake of key messaging at the regional and international levels.
Together with our partners, we provided regular analysis and organised meetings with key policy and advocacy actors. Project reviews show there is uptake of key messaging at regional and international levels.
Output 1.2.2 Communities, civil society actors, private sector and other stakeholders are mobilized to act on human security issues
Conferences will be held at state level to bring together key actors to discuss human security issues identified through the community action groups and Community Communication system.
1.2.2 # of conferences that engage actors at various levels
The indicator is a count of conferences held at state level to discuss human security issues.
Activities under this output will start in year 2 of the project
Activities contributing to this output will begin later in the year.
Activities that contribute to this output will be implemented in Y4. Delays were encountered in implementation due to significant changes to the political context in Sudan in Y3.
Outcome 2: Civil society networks, organisations, and leaders (from inside and outside of the country) build solidarity and promote social cohesion with the population by connecting local actors and priorities with national ones.
This outcome will track steps taken by civil society networks towards creating opportunities for peaceful process and conflict transformation. Emphasis will be placed on inclusive processes and the ability of civil society networks to contribute to addressing root causes of insecurity through connecting local priorities with national ones.
Indicator O2: Number and type of proactive and jointly organised initiatives on identified issues that platform members jointly implement
A platform that brings together civil society from state and lower level to discuss, plan and address human security issues will be formed. Membership to the platform will be voluntary. The platforms will be supported with small grants by the project to implement agreed on actions to address identified human security issues. This will take a variety of forms depending on identified issues. Proactive initiatives are actions that the civil society develops with no external influence.
Activities under Outcome 2 were modified to lead with the creation of the small grants mechanism, activities for which commenced in Q2 of Year 2. We conducted an in-depth civil society actor mapping in all areas of operation order to gain a better understanding of the collective issues and needs of communities, as well as the existing capacity of civil society actors at the sub-regional and regional levels on the basis of which a more targeted small grants mechanism was developed, detailed analysis of civil society space, youth and women initiatives and existing civil society networks was developed and additional implementing partners identified.
Output 3.1.2 National civil society actors identify and develop ideas and plans for collaboration
Collaboration of national civil society actors is demonstrated
3.1.2 # of notes indicating collaboration developed
This is a count of documents that summarise proceedings and actions of meetings. Actions and proceedings will indicate collaboration, e.g. in the form of joint activities or statements.
Two meeting notes have been developed. The notes provide a context update and a summary of agreed actions for civil society actors to collaborate on. Following the civil society actor meeting in June 2017, sixteen priority areas and action points were identified for joint implementation over a six month period. In order to facilitate this, working groups were formed – each with an identified focal point to ensure actions are followed up and completed. These working groups will also support future collaboration and joint working between civil society actors. The working groups are focused on the following themes: knowledge management, strengthening existing society mechanisms for coordination, national level advocacy targeting political actors, and international advocacy. The third meeting for YR 1 was rescheduled to the first quarter of YR 2 due to unavailability of participants in the originally planned period.
Two meetings were held with civil society actors to discuss follow up actions on collaboration and coordination among civil society actors. A total of 53 actors (20 female, 33 male) participated in the meetings. Civil society actors discussed and agreed on joint responses towards issues related to peace and stability. A list of actions was developed and roles assigned for implementation. The program has developed an advocacy strategy that guides its engagement with regional and international actors on key issues.
Civil society actors held a meeting at the beginning of the year during which they developed analyses of the context and agreed on joint actions to respond to a identified changes
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA_F014_29437
Saferworld
Restoring Stable Communities in Somalia
This project aims at restoring stable communities in Somalia through establishing local structures that research, identify, analyse, prioritize and implement solutions to community security issues, in collaboration with local authorities, formal security actors and civil society. At the state level, it will re-establish bodies that promote community-responsive policing, acting as a link through which information on security provision is channelled, and form bridges between local, state and national levels. Learning and insights from all levels will be fed upwards through national-level civil society networks, promoting community-focused security provision at national and international level. The objectives of the programme are to strengthen the capacity of local civil society groups and communities to research and facilitate broad dialogue across clan and state-society divides about local security issues, provide resources for implementation of joint conflict prevention and community security initiatives, support cross-regional community exchange to share experiences and common security problems, link community members with existing dispute resolution mechanisms, support the re-introduction and development of regional oversight mechanisms such as police accountability committees with channels for community input, provide training on accountability, gender- and conflict-sensitivity, link these bodies into a cross-regional learning network, facilitate their engagement in policy dialogue at the federal member state level, conduct policy discourse with the Somali federal government, regional bodies and international actors to communicate evidence about inclusive approaches to improving human security, and facilitate dialogue among policy-makers at the national level and communities. This will eventually result in a reduction in inter and intra-clan division and violence, more inclusive, responsive and accountable security provision including effective mechanisms to prevent misuse of power and improve coordination, greater coherence in policy formation between Federal regions, and more evidence-based policy and programming on human security from international actors.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
1514761
1554234
1824248
1630853
2057242
689824
2nd Instalment
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
7917682
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
2057242
2020 Installment
1968292
Year 3 Advance Payment
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
1323409
Year 2 Expenditure
780629
Saferworld
1514761
1st instalment
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Output 2.1 Research and analysis provides a broad understanding of the challenges facing formal police services, operation of former PACs, and informs PAC composition
This output falls under outcome 2 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3. Research will consult communities and stakeholders at the FMS level to analyse the main issues and challenges facing the PACs and inform the design of this new structure. It will be coordinated with other agencies.
O2.1.1 Police accountability/reform template produced
This indicator counts the completion of a template to promote police accountability/reform.
The activity inline with this output will begin Y2.
The police accountability template is produced Q3 Y2.
The Police accountability template is developed and will be used throughout the project period.
The Police accountability template is developed year two and will be used throughout the project period.
The Police accountability template is developed in year two and will be used throughout the project period.
Output 2.2 PACs are formed, hold a regular discussion with CAFS, regularly monitor and oversee police conduct, detainee conditions, and provide paralegal support to vulnerable detainees
This output falls under outcome 2 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3. Police advisory committees are a key mechanism for project implementation. They will link with CAFs and communities to promote better service delivery and increase trust.
O2.2.1 Number of new PACs established, with terms of reference.
This indicator counts the number of PACs established. Three PACs will be established, 1 per state. PACs are police advisory committees that will promote improved interaction and communication between communities and police to promote accountability.
Activity in support to this will begin Y2.
All the 3 PACs were established and continues capacity building will provided through project period.
All the 3 PACs were established and continues capacity building will be provided through project period.
All the 3 PACs were established and continues capacity building will be provided through project period.
All the 3 PACs were established and continuous capacity building will be provided throughout the project period.
O2.2.3 Number of meetings and discussions held between CAFs and PACs
This indicator counts the number meetings that take place between CAFs and PACs. These meetings provide space to share grievances, update on community concerns and issues, and collectively problem solve. Discussions will take place twice a year from year 2.
Activities in support of this indicator begin in Y2.
Q3 -3 PAC and CAF meetings were conducted Q4 - 5 PAC and CAF meetings were conducted
2 meetings were conducted in Q1, 3 were conducted Q2, 2 were conducted Q3 and another 2 were conducted Q4. This activity will continue throughout the year.
Four meetings were conducted in a year four.
CAF and PAC meetings were conducted in two locations.
Output 3.2 State and national-level policy makers are directly connected to local communities through exchange visits that build relationships
This output falls under outcome 3 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. This output will contribute towards improving the flow of information from the local to the Federal Member State (FMS) and Federal levels and support advocacy for policy and practice change.
O3.2.1 Number of policy maker to community visits
This indicator counts the number of policymakers to community visits. Up to nine policymakers to community visits will take place. Three per state. Policymakers can be from the FMS or Federal levels.
Activities in support of this indicator begin in Year 3.
Activities in support of this indicator will begin in Year 4.
11 policymakers visited the communities in the three locations.
Activity in line with this indicator was conducted in year four of the program.
Output 3.4 Policy analysis is produced that links local-level developments to international discourse, and Horn of Africa regional and international actors are brought together to jointly learn and discuss civil society’s role in enhancing human security and promoting collaboration
This output falls under outcome 3 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. This output will contribute towards improving the flow of information from the local level to the international level, targeting regional and international actors to consider evidence and best practice and amend policy to promote civil society’s role.
O3.4.1 Number of policy analysis and in-depth thematic reports produced
This indicator counts the number of policy analysis and in-depth thematic reports produced. At least one policy analysis or in-depth thematic report will be produced a year.
Activity in line to this indicator is postponed to year 3. Setting up and training PACs took more than the expected and this led to postponing this activity.
Activity in line to this indicator will happen year 4.
Activities in support of this indicator are conducted Y4.
One thematic report was published in Q4
Output 3.3 Policy dialogues arranged to connect policy-makers at the federal and FMS levels
This output falls under outcome 3 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. This output will contribute towards improving the flow of information from the Federal Member State (FMS) level to the Federal level and support advocacy for policy and practice change.
O3.3.2 Number of participants, role and seniority
This indicator counts the number of participants, their role and seniority. Participants are FMS and Federal level policy makers representing targeted ministries.
Activities in support of this indicator begin in Year 3 only.
Activities in support of this indicator conducted only in Mogadishu and will continue throughout the program..
This activity will be conducted from Q4 and will continue throughout the program.
One policy dialogue forum was conducted in Q4. 10 participants from the FMS parliaments attended the forum
O3.3.3 Number of roundtables at FMS level
This indicator counts the number of roundtables held at the FMS level. Up to three will take place, one in each state.
Activities in support of this indicator begin in Year 3.
Activities in support of this indicator is postponed to year 4. this is because of the contextual changes and the nature of the issues selected by the communities.
Activities in support of this indicator begin only in Y5. This activity was postponed due to Covid19.
One roundtable discussion was conducted in each region in Q4.
Output 2.4 PACs operating within and across the three target regions share information on community security and policing.
This output falls under outcome 2 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3. Police advisory committees are a key mechanism for project implementation.
O2.4.1 Number of PAC Review Meetings.
This indicator counts the number of PAC review meetings; a total of five PAC review meetings will take place, one per year.
Three review meetings conducted one in Kismayo and two in Mogadishu.
One cross PAC review meeting was conducted in Q4 year 4.
This activity was adopted due to the challenges of COVID 19 (Covid protocols).
Output 3.1 Learning from local CAF activities and regional PAC monitoring is fed into policy through advocacy briefings
This output falls under outcome 3 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. This output will contribute towards improving the flow of information from the local to the Federal Member State (FMS) level and support advocacy for policy and practice change.
O3.1.2 Number of advocacy briefings produced
This indicator counts the number of advocacy briefings produced. Up to 6 briefings will be produced, generated through the interactions and dialogues of and between the CAFs and PACs.
Activities in support of this indicator begin in Year 3 only.
Two briefings produced Q2.
Four briefings are produced in Q3, another 2 is produced in Q4.
Three briefings were produced in year 5.
O3.1.3 Number of policy makers receiving advocacy briefings
This indicator counts the number of policy makers who receive advocacy briefs. At least 10 policy makers at the FMS and Federal levels will receive the briefings at the outset with this number increased by 20% each year.
Activities in support of this indicator begin in Year 3 only.
Activities in support of this indicator begin only in Year 4.
This activity was conducted throughout the year 4.
The activity in line with this indicator was conducted in year 5.
Output 1.1 High-quality training provided to community members and civil society on community security and advocacy
This output falls under outcome 1 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. It aims to track the immediate quantity and type of actors who receive training on security and advocacy. The training they receive will contribute to their ability to identify and analyses safety and security needs, build trust with one another through collaboration and implement conflict and gender sensitive community security programming.
O1.1.2 Number and type of participants
This indicator counts the number and type of participants who are given high-quality training. At least six community members in each state will attend.
This activity is inline to the targets of 2017 and was implemented Q1 of 2018.
This activity was conducted from Q2 to Q3.
Refresher training was conducted in all the locations.
The activity in line with is completed year four of the program.
O1.2.1 Number of CSAs produced, and geographical coverage of findings
This indicator counts the number of CSAs produced. A minimum of four CSAs will be carried out over the course of the project, each covering all three target states.
The 1st community driven CSA research was commissioned in quarter 3 in Year one and data collection exercise completed. During the reporting period, the CSA findings used to inform the development of 20 community action plans in this quarter.
This activity is conducted Q4 of 2018.
The Year 3 CSA will be updated on Year four.
CSA was conducted in December, year 4.
CSA will be conducted Q4 of this year
Output 1.4 CAFs from across individual states meet to exchange experiences, challenges and learning, and capture these in briefings.
This output falls under outcome 1 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. The CAFs are one of the main mechanisms of project delivery. They will be supported to exchange across states with one another to share learning and experiences.
O1.4.1 Number of cross-CAF learning and exchange meetings
This indicator counts the number of cross-CAF learning and exchange meetings. Three CAF learning and exchange meetings per year.
Three district level cross CAF meetings and one country level cross CAF meeting were conducted.
National Cross CAF learning will be conducted on Q1 year 4.
Two regional level cross CAF meeting conducted and one national Cross CAF learning was conducted.
Three district level intercommunity dialogue was conducted in year 5.
Output 1.5. Conflict and gender sensitivity workshops make existing dispute resolution mechanisms better able to contribute to human security and long-term stability
This output falls under outcome 1 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. Training for CAFs and other dispute resolution mechanisms on conflict and gender sensitivity will support them in better analyzing and identifying security issues that affect the whole community, and in implementing action plans that are sensitive to different dynamics.
O1.5.1 Number of training workshops in conflict and gender sensitivity for existing dispute resolution mechanisms
This indicator counts the number of training workshops. Six training workshops, two per state, by year2 and Year 3 quarter 4.
This activity was re-scheduled Q1 Y2.
The targets of 2017 was achieved quarter one of 2018.
Refresher training were provided all the CAFs.
Refresher training was conducted in all the locations.
Refresher trainings was conducted in Baidoa and kismayo.
Output 2.3 PACs and police trained in accountability processes and mechanism, and their respective roles.
This output falls under outcome 2 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3. Police advisory committees are a key mechanism for project implementation.
O2.3.2 Number of participants disaggregated by stakeholder at sensitization workshops/events.
This indicator counts the number participants attending sensitization workshops and events. It will be disaggregated by stakeholders. Senior representatives from local police stations, as well as command structures, will be present at sensitization workshops/events.
One PAC-police sensitization workshop/event in each CAF location was conducted with a total of nine. The activity participated by 47 participants (33 males and 13 females)
The activity in support to this indicator was conducted in year two.
Output 1.3 Community Action Forums (CAFs) are formed at the local level, that hold dialogues within communities and between communities and state authorities, work collaboratively on local security issues and plan responses, with seed funds provided to support implementation.
This output falls under outcome 1 and contributes to lower-level outcomes 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. The CAFs are one of the main mechanisms of project delivery. Three CAFs will be established per state, one rural, one urban and one for women only.
O1.3.1 Number of CAFs formed, and location.
This indicator counts the number of CAFs formed, dis aggregated by location. The project seeks to form up to 9 CAFs across the target locations. CAFs will be set up either through identified local structures or by creating new structures. They are representative of the surrounding population.
This activity is designed only one time through project period.
This activity was implemented in quarter 1 , Year 2, 10 CAFs were formed (3 in Kismayu, 3 in Baidoa and 4 in Mogadishu).Additional CAFs will be formed in year 3 (once work plan for year 3 is approved.
CAFs will be formed only in 1st year and they will be trained regularly and will carry out community level research throughout the program.
5 CAFs were formed (3 in Baidoa and 2 in Kismayo).
CAFs were formed on year one and three and they will be trained regularly and will carry out community level research throughout the program.
This activity was implemented in year 2 and three of the program.
O1.3.4 Number of action plans produced
This indicator counts the number of action plans produced by the CAFs. Each CAF will produce at least two actions plans per year, leading to up to 36 action plans in total. The action plans respond to needs identified through community consultation and dialogue.
CAFs are working the implementation of action plans developed in Q1.
52 action plans developed (Q1 24, Q2 9 and Q3 19).
This activity will continue throughout programing implementation.
The program continued the implementation of previous action plans and 26 action plans are developed in year 5
O1.3.3 Number of CAF meetings/dialogues to discuss local security issues and ways to address them
This indicator counts the number of CAF meetings and dialogues to discuss local security issues and that identify ways to address them. CAFs will hold regular meetings across the project period.
This activity will continue during the course of the program implementation. (20 meetings happened in Q1, 49 meetings happened in Q2 and 60 meetings happened in Q3 and 60 in Q4)
This activity will continue during the course of the program implementation. (Program conducted Q1 52, Q2 108, Q3 84 and 90)
This activity will continue during the course of the program implementation. (Program conducted Q1 90, Q2 86, Q3 90 and Q4).
This activity will continue during the course of the program implementation. (Program conducted Q1 90, Q2, 102, Q3 102, Q4 56)
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDA_Core_EZ*_2014-17
Saferworld
Preventing and reducing violent conflict and promoting cooperative approaches to security building
Core support to Saferworld's work to prevent and reduce violent conflict and promote cooperative approaches to Security Building.
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Mina Zingariello
Funding Officer
mzingariello@saferworld.org.uk
www.saferworld.org.uk
659190
659190
1119324
460134
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
1106604
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
1106604
Saferworld
419574
Saferworld
789986
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
127373
Saferworld
243039
Saferworld
541114
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
541114
Saferworld
1977570
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
Preventing and reducing violent conflict and promoting cooperative approaches to security building
website
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDAHelpdesk_E001
Saferworld
SIDA Helpdesk on Human Security (2012-2015)
Together with the Department of Peace Studies of Bradford and the Stockholm Policy Group, offering a multidisciplinary team of experts, who among them have extensive research, consultancy and programme implementation experience. The consortium aims to bridge the divide that often looms between practitioners, academics and policy-makers.
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
University of Bradford, Department of Peace Studies
Saferworld
University of Bradford, Department of Peace Studies
Stockholm Policy Group AB
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Worldwide
1219458
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
14302
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
18964
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
26605
Saferworld
5773
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
3166
Saferworld
18671
Saferworld
23591
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
10944
Saferworld
2276
Saferworld
-637
Saferworld
4906
Saferworld
5504
Saferworld
196
Saferworld
21146
Saferworld
16690
Saferworld
7872
Saferworld
14533
Saferworld
32243
Saferworld
16134
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
85351
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-HumanityUnited_N025
Saferworld
Capacities for Peace - Learning and Evaluation
Saferworld and Conciliation Resources are currently implementing an EU-funded project called Capacities for Peace (C4P), which aims to strengthen local actors capacity in early warning and early response. The C4P project, which runs from 01 September 2013 to 29 February 2016 and covers 32 contexts across the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and Latin America, provides an unique opportunity to extract and share lessons on: 1) early warning and response processes and their peacebuilding purpose, 2) the role and added value of CSOs in early warning and response, and 3) how best to build CSOs capacity to effectively undertake these roles. Such a learning process will benefit international actors policies and practice in the field of early warning, and contribute to enhancing the knowledge and standards of the peacebuilding sector.
Humanity United
Saferworld
Saferworld
Conciliation Resources
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Worldwide
85889
85889
Humanity United
Saferworld
1475
Saferworld
31544
Saferworld
52870
Saferworld
85889
Humanity United
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-UNSCAR_L001
Saferworld
Supporting and promoting African and global ATT implementation
The project: (1) assists less-developed states in the ECWAS and RECSA sub-regions to self-identify and -prioritise the steps they will need to take to become fully ATT compliant; and (2) provides, through the Expert Group on ATT Implementation (EGAI), an informal inter-cessional process at which ATT experts from around the world can discuss and develop possible responses to implementation challenges.
UNSCAR
Saferworld
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
127557
51596
UNSCAR
Saferworld
7958
Saferworld
29573
Saferworld
15234
UNSCAR
Saferworld
127557
UNSCAR
Saferworld
3096
Saferworld
52277
UNSCAR
Saferworld
77656
Saferworld
691
Saferworld
119
Saferworld
15
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-JRCT_N015
Saferworld
Playing by the rules: Ensuring that EU Member States honour their arms-transfer-control obligations
The long-term goal of this programme is to encourage the harmonisation of and increasing restraint in arms transfer policy and practice within the UK and EU so as to minimise the impact of proliferation and misuse of conventional arms on the lives of those facing situations of armed conflict.
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Developing countries, unspecified
34279
37489
4577
Saferworld
17942
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
8954
Saferworld
9054
Saferworld
4565
Saferworld
7123
Saferworld
4442
Saferworld
8971
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
8971
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
8971
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
8971
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
8971
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
8971
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
10311
Saferworld
8404
Saferworld
71768
Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust
Saferworld
11768
Saferworld
2570
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-Sweden-NetherlandsMFAs_F009
Saferworld
Promoting Peaceful and Inclusive Societies
The aim of the next phase of Saferworlds project is to ensure that the gains achieved in (provisionally) securing the inclusion of peaceful and inclusive societies in the post-2015 agenda can be translated into action. The project objectives are: 1. To maximise the prospect of retaining peaceful and inclusive societies within the final agreement adopted in September 2015; 2. To reinforce and widen the political will behind peaceful and inclusive societies, and to help build a sustained constituency of supporters that will carry through to the implementation phase; 3. To inform and support the development of an ambitious yet actionable accountability framework for Goal 16, including effective peacebuilding indicators; and 4. To inform and facilitate dialogue on initiatives, modalities and partnerships for the effective implementation of peaceful and inclusive societies commitments.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Worldwide
76540
142860
-672
F009
Saferworld
8719
F009
Saferworld
3543
F009
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
219400
F009
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
218378
F009
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
6148
F009
Saferworld
94138
F009
Saferworld
113589
F009
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-SwedishMFA_E006
Saferworld
Promoting Peaceful and Inclusive Societies
The aim of the next phase of Saferworlds project is to ensure that the gains achieved in (provisionally) securing the inclusion of peaceful and inclusive societies in the post-2015 agenda can be translated into action. The project objectives are: 1. To maximise the prospect of retaining peaceful and inclusive societies within the final agreement adopted in September 2015; 2. To reinforce and widen the political will behind peaceful and inclusive societies, and to help build a sustained constituency of supporters that will carry through to the implementation phase; 3. To inform and support the development of an ambitious yet actionable accountability framework for Goal 16, including effective peacebuilding indicators; and 4. To inform and facilitate dialogue on initiatives, modalities and partnerships for the effective implementation of peaceful and inclusive societies commitments.
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Worldwide
76540
4898
Saferworld
41730
Saferworld
26557
Saferworld
74469
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
-1284
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
76540
Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOBangladesh_B016
Saferworld
Promoting Participatory Approaches to Enhancing the Role of Youth in Democratic Engagement in Satkhira
The project aims to build the capacity of and empower youth who are most at risk of being primary drivers of political violence in Bangladesh. Morebroadly this action seeks to contribute to democratic reform and the promotion of the human right to justice and security. We will achieve this by increasing youth-led civil society (YLCS) capacities to enhance access to justice and promote the rights of vulnerable groups, through a hybrid methodology that will combine training, a locally driven iniative supported by a small grant, and policy advocacy.
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Bangladesh Enterprise Institute (BEI)
Sam Godolphin
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Bangladesh
103422
16700
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
25035
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
21365
Saferworld
31101
Saferworld
39274
Saferworld
103422
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
50004
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-SwissCaucasus_T001_T006
Saferworld
Promoting community-focused responses to insecurity and conflict in border areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan (Years 1-3)
The activity aims to raise awareness, both nationally and internationally, of the security concerns of communities living in frontline areas along the Armenia-Azerbaijan border and around Nagorny Karabakh, as well as empowering communities to add their voices to security provision and peace-building processes. It focuses on the one hand on enabling remote conflict-affected communities living on either side of the Armenian-Azerbaijani international border and near the Line-of-Contact to feed their experiences and safety and security concerns into security provision and peacebuilding processes, and on the other hand increasing support among Armenian and Azerbaijani governments for community-based approaches to security provision, including in the longer term, to cross-divide initiatives.
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Civil Society Institute
Society for Humanitarian Research
Phase 1: 1 January - 31 December 2014; Phase 2: 1 April 2015 - 15 May 2017
Phase 1: 1 January - 31 December 2014; Phase 2: 1 April 2015 - 15 May 2017
Phase 1: 1 January - 31 December 2014; Phase 2: 1 April 2015 - 15 May 2017
Sam Godolphin
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
15220
109000
187477
187477
23435
11408
Phase 1 - T001: Expenditures and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
28029
Phase 1 - T001: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2014
Saferworld
31140
Phase 1 - T001: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2014
Saferworld
109000
Phase 1 - T001
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
12599
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
29193
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
58867
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
42237
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
39478
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
24871
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
44660
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
25348
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
34481
Phase 2 - T006
Saferworld
20989
Phase 1 - T001
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
26533
Phase 1 - T001: Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2014
Saferworld
398389
Phase 2 - T006
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
120301
Phase 2 - T006
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
135249
Phase 2 - T006
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
66999
Phase 2 - T006
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
65306
Phase 1 - T001
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
26381
Phase 2 - T006
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Website
SwissCaucasus_T001_T006
GB-CHC-1043843-USAID_I003
Saferworld
People to People Reconciliation - Point of View and Beyond in the Caucasus
Saferworld, with George Mason University and UCI, will convene nine workshops of the Mason Point of View Process, extended in collaboration on the ground in Georgia with Saferworld and cross-ABL community security networks, and complemented by UCIs engagement of Georgian, Abkhaz, and, eventually, South Ossetian students in online and in person learning and dialogue programs.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
Saferworld
George Mason University
UCI
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Caucasus
70170
70169
9335
Saferworld
10523
Saferworld
7926
Saferworld
6664
Saferworld
11102
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
16797
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
29704
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
51292
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
19056
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
140339
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
11096
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
5442
Saferworld
17917
Saferworld
61557
Saferworld
6873
Saferworld
12810
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-FCO_B020
Saferworld
Empowering communities and civil society in eastern parts of Abkhazia to effectively participate in security policy and decision making including other public policy related processess
The outcome sought by the intervention is that vulnerable communities have greater agency in contributing to the stability and security of their region through greater engagement in decision-making and the implementation of policies that are informed by and are accountable to communities needs.
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Georgia
69980
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
57768
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
12212
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
10606
Saferworld
16669
Saferworld
42705
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-FCO_B021
Saferworld
Preventing diversion of arms and dual-use goods and technologies: cooperation with China
Preventing diversion of arms
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Developing countries, unspecified
86328
34807
Saferworld
36378
Saferworld
11426
Saferworld
86328
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
86328
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
3717
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-FCOKenya_C001
Saferworld
Galvanising responses by state and NSA to peace and security challenges in Kenya
This project seeks to build strategic coordination among key actors in conflict management and to revitalise sustainable and continuous engagement to enable them to anticipate, plan and respond to conflict and insecurity in a structured and systematic manner. This is particularly crucial as the country moves towards the general elections in 2017, given that elections have been a trigger for ethnic violence in the past and are likely to exacerbate existing tensions around boundaries, ethnic polarisation, extractives and violent extremism.
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Kenya
199152
199152
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
26835
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
118143
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
53862
UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Saferworld
11347
Saferworld
63472
Saferworld
124021
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USIP_V004
Saferworld
Promoting people-focused approaches to security provision throughout Kyrgyzstan
Strengthen the capacities of representative civil society to further promote community policing, analyse security issues, and engage in policy debates/discussions on security provision. Promote broader and more informed dialogue between civil society and local, national and international decision-makers on causes of insecurity and mechanisms for people-centred security provision in Kyrgyzstan.
United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Kyrgyzstan
106969
13371
45660
Saferworld
120340
United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
34647
Saferworld
16745
Saferworld
40114
United States Institute for Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
39711
United States Institute for Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
40113
United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
22886
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-CanadaGPSF_J002
Saferworld
Promoting people-focused approaches to security provision throughout Kyrgyzstan
This project aims at strengthening the role of civil society in the democratization of security provision through supporting their capacity-building and creating additional mechanisms and space for dialogue between civil society, police, local authorities and other interested parties. In particular, it will focus on building the knowledge, skills and outreach of the Civic Union network (the CU), a group of 27 civil society organisations (CSOs) and activists who have been working on police reform with Saferworld since 2012. The project will create opportunities to elicit the perspectives of vulnerable sections of society including youth and women - who are too often marginalised - and not involved in debates, build and strengthen relationships between stakeholders, encourage coordination and coherence at the local and national levels, and promote discussion on challenges and responses to achieve sustainable outcomes.
Canada - Global Affairs Canada (Global Peace and Security Fund)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Civic Union Network
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Kyrgyzstan
130612
130612
Canada - Global Affairs Canada (Global Peace and Security Fund)
Saferworld
68067
Canada - Global Affairs Canada (Global Peace and Security Fund)
Saferworld
68737
Canada - Global Affairs Canada (Global Peace and Security Fund)
Saferworld
110848
Saferworld
25956
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_U003
Saferworld
Promoting youth leadership and inter-ethnic collaboration on security provision in Southern Kyrgyzstan
The primary goal of the proposed project is to promote youth leadership and inter-ethnic collaboration on security provision in Southern Kyrgyzstan. The project will support a movement away from heated ethnic discourse by developing young, ethnically diverse grass-roots activists into leaders and supporting constructive cooperation between them, their communities and security providers. The practical focus of cooperation is on addressing mutual security challenges and promoting the emergence of inclusive policy and practice in security provision.
US Department of State
Saferworld
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Kyrgyzstan
237624
237623
19802
101281
Saferworld
107149
US Department of State
Saferworld
55077
Saferworld
107149
Saferworld
131945
US Department of State
Saferworld
158704
US Department of State
Saferworld
90350
US Department of State
Saferworld
58479
Saferworld
73466
Saferworld
57423
Saferworld
17682
Saferworld
17591
Saferworld
495049
US Department of State
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_U002
Saferworld
Preventing Radicalization and Violent Extremism Leading to Terrorism through Cross-Border Community Policing in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan
Together with our local partner, the Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI), we have been working on the project, Preventing radicalism and violent extremism through community policing in Kyrgyzstan. We are bringing together communities from different ethnicities and encouraging constructive co-operation on local security issues between residents, authorities and law enforcement agencies. From this experience we are developing practical, evidence-based policy recommendations to feed into wider debates on community security effectiveness, linking our community work with national policy changes.
US Department of State
Saferworld
Saferworld
Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI)
Sam Godolphin
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Kyrgyzstan
403299
403300
403300
33608
1243507
US Department of State
Saferworld
81177
Saferworld
258054
US Department of State
Saferworld
45550
US Department of State
Saferworld
26391
US Department of State
Saferworld
94395
US Department of State
Saferworld
20226
US Department of State
Saferworld
74560
Saferworld
152677
Saferworld
239611
US Department of State
Saferworld
124489
US Department of State
Saferworld
146022
US Department of State
Saferworld
149287
Saferworld
135161
Saferworld
165939
Saferworld
128606
Saferworld
59696
Expenditures and disbursements to local partners from April to June 2013
Saferworld
22694
Expenditures and disbursements to local partners from July to September 2013
Saferworld
61868
Expenditure and disbursements to local partners from October to December 2013
Saferworld
45734
Expenditures and disbursements to local partners from January to March 2014
Saferworld
46297
US Department of State
Saferworld
60000
US Department of State
Saferworld
33374
US Department of State
Saferworld
67249
Saferworld
149098
US Department of State
Saferworld
98859
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-ECSomaliland_D025
Saferworld
Supporting Electoral and Representative Democracy in Somaliland
The specific objective of this project is to promote a transparent electoral process in Somaliland which is representative of a broad range of civil society concerns.
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
Saferworld
Somaliland Non State Actors Forum (SONSAF)
Somali South Central Non-State Actors (SOSCENSA)
Puntland Non-State Actors' Association (PUNSAA)
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Somalia
49957
Saferworld
71611
Saferworld
7700
Saferworld
53044
Saferworld
125431
Saferworld
48440
Saferworld
59454
Saferworld
271714
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
270094
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
745875
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
46259
Saferworld
-24186
Saferworld
281269
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USAID_I004
Saferworld
Integrating Conflict-Sensitivity in Land governance for conflict prevention and resolution
This project aims to contribute to peaceful resolution of land related conflicts in Mbale Mukono and Mityana by 2016. The implementation of this project is dependent on match funding from Irish Aid.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Centre for Conflict Resolution (CECORE)
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Uganda
128485
22587
Saferworld
67534
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
61843
Saferworld
-8130
Saferworld
20322
Saferworld
128485
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
16909
Saferworld
7726
Saferworld
53723
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-NWO_F011
Saferworld
Trialling tools for participatory gender analysis of conflict in Uganda
Through high quality, locally-led research and collaborative analysis, this project is gathering evidence on how the conflict is impacting women, how women are engaged in improving security in their localities, and what opportunities for women's participation in peacebuilding initiatives exist at a local level.
NWO
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
55330
16454
Saferworld
20261
Saferworld
-2752
Saferworld
12512
Saferworld
40450
NWO
Saferworld
55330
NWO
Saferworld
6025
NWO
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-ECYemen_D020
Saferworld
Youth and National Dialogue Outcomes: Agents for Change at the Local Level
The overall objective of the action is to empower civil society actors to promote more inclusive, equitable and democratic political processes in Yemen that respect and protect human rights. The specific objective of the action is to strengthen the capacity of youth actors and initiatives to advocate for and monitor the implementation of National Dialogue Conference outcomes at a local and governorate level.
European Commission - EIDHR
Saferworld
Saferworld
Riwaa Youth Development Foundation
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Yemen
15220
75121
Saferworld
315143
European Commission - EIDHR
Saferworld
11903
Saferworld
21927
Saferworld
14508
Saferworld
56084
Saferworld
44681
Saferworld
64506
Saferworld
60256
Saferworld
40340
Saferworld
156743
European Commission - EIDHR
Saferworld
147192
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-NWOYemen_F016
Saferworld
Enhancing women's role in peace and security in Yemen
The overarching goal of this project is to inform and support activities that promote womens involvement in local level peace-building in Fragile and Conflict Affected States (FCAS).
NWO
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Yemen
83686
307
Saferworld
3113
Saferworld
57208
Saferworld
13521
Saferworld
845
Saferworld
83686
NWO
Saferworld
8692
Saferworld
71003
NWO
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsMFA_F017_29040
Saferworld
Peaceful, just and inclusive societies: Promoting national action
This project aims to support stakeholders in the Horn of Africa region to make use of the 2030 Agenda to contribute to peaceful, just and inclusive societies at the national level.
Indicative project objectives: 1. Map national stakeholders and key implementation institutions; 2. Identify change-agents who can become Goal 16 champions; 3. Contextualise Goal 16 through prioritisation and alignment; 4. Promote innovative and collective approaches; 5. Support monitoring processes; 6. Track implementation of Goal 16 in pilot countries; 7. Support follow-up and review processes; 8. Advise international actors on effective engagement; 9. Examine evidence, learn and promote best practices. Country-specific strategies, objectives and outputs designed after initial assessments and consultations.
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
61162
191557
195685
448404
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
22539
Saferworld
20483
Saferworld
18139
Saferworld
33466
Saferworld
154531
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
149612
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Increased awareness among stakeholders (both non-state actors and government) engaging on peace-related issues regarding the 2030 Agenda and SDG16+
We will continue to build relationships and confidence with civil society stakeholders, hold consultations and explore partnership options with relevant civil society actors.
Number of consultations held with stakeholders to strengthen their understanding and capacities regarding the 2030 Agenda and SDG16+
Stakeholders include civil society, government officials and international stakeholders.
Global processes and events related to SDG16+ are informed by the perspectives, experiences and analysis of stakeholders from the Horn of Africa region
We will support change agents, such as civil society activists, politicians, businesspersons and youth leaders who can become Goal 16 champions, to participate in international follow-up and review processes and connect them with allies internationally.
Number of Goal 16 champions supported to participate and feed into global processes and debates related to the 2030 Agenda.
Their participation helped ensure that international policy debates did not ignore practical questions about how to support implementation of the agenda at the national level and they were able to connect with relevant policy actors at the global level.
Implementation of Goal 16 tracked in focus countries
Saferworld has developed a methodology to assess whether and how national stakeholders are using the framework and integrating the SDGs, especially Goal 16, into their plans and actions.
Number of 2-year national tracking studies published
Starting from the baseline assessments conducted in Year 1, progress in the implementation of Goal 16 in each focus country will be tracked and reviewed.
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
Civil society representatives contribute to and learn from the experiences of other stakeholders in the Horn of Africa region who are mobilising around the 2030 Agenda and SDG16+
Number of regional meetings of CSOs held
Regional meetings will be held to exchange knowledge and experiences regarding engagement with national authorities on Goal 16 issues and how the SDG agenda can be utilised to build more peaceful, just and inclusive societies.
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
Number of participants at the regional CSO meetings
Disaggregated by gender
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
Baseline assessments in focus countries have been conducted to both inform Saferworld's project strategies and help track the implementation of Goal 16
Given the complex political and insecurity context in the focus countries it was important to prepare the ground carefully for any engagement with national stakeholders on the 2030 Agenda, and especially on sensitive topics related to conflict, justice and governance. Therefore during the inception period, initial baseline assessments (based on desk research and consultations) will be conducted in the focus countries to inform Saferworld's project strategies as well as enable the tracking of the implementation of Goal 16.
Number of baseline assessments conducted
Based on desk-research and consultations in the region, Saferworld conduct these assessments, which can be periodically updated, of relevant aspects of the national context.
No baseline assessments had been conducted previously.
The
Number of country-focused project strategies developed
No baseline assessments had been conducted previously.
In addition to two national country-focused strategies, also one regional-focused strategy was developed. These tailored approaches respond to the particular needs, capacities and operating contexts in each of the two countries. This is critical as both countries present significantly different operating environments, and political and security contexts. The strategies also outline the regional component of the project, which will focus on enabling civil society representatives in the Horn of Africa to learn from the experiences of other stakeholders in the region who are mobilising around the PJIS agenda.
More cohesive and cross-sector engagement by stakeholders working for peace, justice and inclusion under the SDG framing
This output aims to bring together a diverse set of stakeholders to develop joint strategies to promote specific peace-related issues using the 2030 Agenda's holistic vision of peaceful, just and inclusive societies.
Number of national strategy options papers developed
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
National stakeholders and key implementation institutions mapped and relationships with stakeholders established and strenghtened
Identify and build relationships with the broad set of stakeholders and national institutions that will be instrumental for helping deliver changed policies and approaches to achieving the PJIS agenda.
Initial mapping of stakeholders conducted and Goal 16 Champions identified
Saferworld will identify the broad set of stakeholders and national institutions which will be instrumental for helping deliver changed policies and approaches to meeting Goal 16, including government officials, civil society, media etc.
Saferworld has consulted with national civil society actors, government officials and international partners about how they view the relevance and utility of the global commitments to peaceful societies, and how it can be used to leverage action at the national level. For instance, Saferworld took part in consultations on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda in Uganda. We attended a High-Level Breakfast meeting organised by the Uganda National NGO Forum which focused on Uganda’s role in implementing the Nairobi Outcome Document, which seeks to shape how existing and new development actors implement the 2030 Agenda. As a result of this engagement, we identified a number of civil society stakeholders that work on the SDGs in Uganda, and who could contribute to the regional engagement aspect of the project. Saferworld also initiated engagement on the PJIS agenda in Somaliland with both government officials and the Somaliland Non State Actor Forum (SONSAF).
National multi-stakeholder consultations/dialogue regarding the 2030 Agenda's commitment to peaceful, just and inclusive societies organised by key stakeholders with Saferworld support
Number of national multi-stakeholder consultations/dialogues held
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
This output is part of the Annual Plan 2017/18.
Experiences from focus countries in implementation of Goal 16 feed into national, regional and international follow-up and review processes to shape narratives of progress and ensure they reflect reality and a broad spectrum of voices
Number of national review dialogue meetings held
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
Learning and best practices collected and promoted
Working with national partners we will develop an evidence-base of what approaches have been effective in particular contexts.
Report and policy brief produced on what works and why and disseminated to national and international stakeholders
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
Regional and global learning events held.
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
This output will only be reported on in Year 3.
Guidance provided to international partners and other relevant bodies on how they can support Goal 16 change agents, context-relevant processes and priorities and innovative approaches.
Saferworld was able to participate in and influence policy events and initiatives organised by stakeholders involved in global partnerships for Goal 16. Saferworld has contributed to these initiatives in several ways. We have held numerous bilateral meetings with and produced communications for those coordinating or involved in these new initiatives. In addition, we were invited to play a central role in workshops that aimed to refine and elaborate these initiatives.
Number of policy analyses and briefings on support for Goal 16 disseminated to international partners
This includes briefings, policy analyses, inputs into consultations etc.
Saferworld published and disseminated a range of outputs during this reporting period. These were designed to raise awareness of the importance of implementing the PJIS agenda, and to offer practical guidance and policy recommendations about how to realise this ambition.
Number of advocacy interventions at workshops, meetings and other events targeted at international partners for support for Goal 16
Saferworld’s efforts to help translate the peace-related elements of the SDGs into action have already yielded positive results. Saferworld’s close engagement with key officials within a number of Member States has enabled us to feed into discussions on how to take the implementation process forward. A number of Member States have expressed their appreciation of Saferworld’s work on Goal 16 and have requested meetings with Saferworld to hear and discuss our analysis and technical advice. We have been able to feed into member states’ thinking through various channels such as bilateral meetings, key policy forums, workshops and submissions to official review processes.
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsEmbassySouthSudan_F012_28939
Saferworld
Community Security and Peace Programme
The overall goal of this 36-month Community Security and Peace Programme is to contribute to more peaceful, secure, and resilient communities in South Sudan.
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
7 month Cost extension from the planned end date of 31 May 2019
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
3136073
3110570
2716825
795000
961992
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
65223
Saferworld
727241
Saferworld
657250
Saferworld
2161744
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
629599
Saferworld
385931
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
2134590
Saferworld
627327
Saferworld
795000
Cost extension
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Cost extension
304471
Saferworld
8959479
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
1218417
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
487724
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
1481751
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
782815
Saferworld
1083882
Saferworld
840138
Saferworld
1507796
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
780020
Saferworld
1549097
Netherlands Embassy South Sudan
Saferworld
1121860
Saferworld
Output 1.4: Community action groups in up to 77 communities take a lead in advocating and soliciting support and participation with/from authorities and service providers to resolve local issues, and are active in fostering processes to address ethnic and sectional divisions.
a) Number of community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and others) monthly meetings/dialogues conducted.
Disaggregated by sex, age, meeting agendas, and community action groups. Number of community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and Peace Committees) monthly meetings/dialogues conducted within and between communities and authorities to address community security and peace concerns.
To date, sixty-six (66) monthly meetings were conducted. Out of this fifty (50) of them were CSWGs meeting and the remaining were a higher-level PCRC meeting with the authorities and security providers. Further data disaggregation shows: Aweil and Torit conducted higher number of meetings, 16 and 13 respectively. In Wau only one (1) meeting conducted as still the CAG members are displace and/or living in PoCs after the June conflict. This single meeting was conducted by newly established Lokoloko CAGs in December 2016 in Wau Municipality.
During the reporting period, a total of 539 monthly CAG meetings conducted out of the planned 648 (83%). The purpose of the CAG monthly meetings were to facilitate the CAGs to identify, prioritize and analyze local-level conflict and insecurity on-going manner and to develop action planning to solve their issues. These meetings also provide platforms for continuous reviews and evaluations of CAPs and for on-going planning and re-planning activities. CAGs in four locations, Aweil town, Rumbek Central, Juba, and Torit covered about 45% of the total meetings conducted this year for a couple of reasons, these locations have highest proportions of CAGs (38%) and the locations were relatively stable compared to the others. CAGs in Wau conducted less number/percentage of meetings against their plan (30% of planned meeting conducted). This is due to the political turmoil and political instability coupled with ethnic killing in the state, most CAG members in Wau were displace to other locations and moved to PoC since 2016 Wau conflict. So CAGs were not involving in any forms of community work since then apart from the one new CAG (Loko-loko group) that established last year. All four former groups re-activated and resume work properly in November-2017 and one additional new group also formed this year to reach and support more communities in the target locations.
During the reporting period, 684 (out of the plan 822) community meetings conducted across all the 16 programme locations – which is 83% against the plan. The target was not reached due to continued insecurity in Rumbek and Alualak meeting were not conducted. Out of these, 621 meetings were CAGs and the remaining 63 meetings were Police-Community Relation Committee (PCRC). This means each CAG members met 8 times in average in 12 months to discuss on community peace and security issues, to prioritise them and develop action plan to address the concerns. However CAGs in Aweil Central, Aweil East and Tonj North conducted each 12 meetings - i.e. they were meeting every month.
During the reporting period, 473 (out of the plan 548) community meetings conducted across all the 16 programme locations. Of this, 448 meetings were CAGs and 25 were Police-Community Relation Committee (PCRC). The target was not reached due to insecurity in Rumbek and Alualuak, so CAGs could not meet.
During the project period, 1762 (84%) community action groups meetings conducted across the 16 locations though 74 CAGs.
Outcome 1: Selected communities and community action group members in South Sudan use their increased analysis, dialogue, and peacebuilding skills to identify, prioritise, analyse, and resolve local- and state-level peace and security concerns, engage in reconciliation processes and support newer groups. They do this independently and collaboratively through established mechanisms (e.g., CSWGs, PCRCs, and peace committees).
a) Number of community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs, and others) who are working independently and collaboratively using established mechanisms to contribute to more peaceful, secure, and resilient societies at the local- and state-levels.
Number of community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs, and Peace Committees) who are effectively and independently implementing the community security and peace programme without Saferworld’s support. Saferworld is able to exit in those locations altogether across the programme period. These community action groups are in scenario 1 and represent, the ideal end-state for full sustainability and scale-out.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period we conducted Community Action Groups (CAGs) sustainability assessments. The purpose of the assessment was to check the assumption made during the programme development that all CAGs established and supported for more than 3 years would be phased out at the end of the project. However, the findings show that almost all these CAGs still need some support from Saferworld and Partners due to the fact that they were affected by the July 2016 conflicts and formation of more new states.
b) Percentage of the community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and others) who perceive the overall local conflict and insecurity situation have been improved in the past 12 months.
Perception of the community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs, and Peace Committees) on the overall peace and security situation of the community where they are working for. The regular perception ranking survey with 1-5 ranking scale will be used to get the community’s perceptions through the existing CAGs mechanisms. The ranking scales are: 1=Getting much worse, 2=Getting a little worse, 3=The same as before, 4=Improving a little and, 5=Improving a lot.
45% (17 out of 34)
At least 55% (21 out of 38)
About 50% (17 out of 34) of the CAGs perceived that the relationship between formal and informal authorities and communities has been improved. Whilst almost all CAGs in Juba, Yambio, and Torit reported a deterioration of the security situation after the July-2016 conflict.
At least 70% (30 out of 43)
About 95% (42 out of 44) of the CAGs participated in the assessment believe that the overall local conflict and insecurity situation have been improved. In addition, all CAGs in Juba, Yambio, and Torit perceived that the overall security situation in their community has been improved compared to last year where almost all of them reported a deteriorated situation in similar assessments.
At least 70% (52 out of 74)
About 81% (60 out of 74) of the CAGs perceived that the overall local conflict and insecurity situation have been improved in the last 12 months.
At least 88% (65 out of 74)
About 86% (64 out of 74) of the CAGs perceived that the overall local conflict and insecurity situation have been improved in the last 12 months.
At least 88% (65 out of 74)
About 86% (64 out of 74) of the CAGs perceived that the overall local conflict and insecurity situation have been improved in the last 12 months.
c) Number of local conflict issues including ethnic and sectional divisions that are addressed and resolved by community representative mechanisms (CSWGs, PCRCs and Peace Committees).
Numbers of local conflict issues including inter/intra communal and sectional fighting that resolved by the community action groups, CSOs partner with the support from the formal and informal authorities and service providers at the local-level through regular dialogues and/or debates with conflicting parties.
To date, eight (8) local-level conflicts issues addressed by the community action groups. Data disaggregation shows: three (3) were sectional fighting, two (2) border fighting, and the others were fighting over farm-land in Torit, fighting between PoC and town youths in Wau and disagreement between non-state actors and polices again in Torit.
During the reporting period, fourteen (14) local conflicts including ethnic and sectional divisions resolved through our community action groups (CAGs) mechanisms with the support from formal and informal authorities out of the planned 12 (117%).
During the reporting period, 15 (out of the plan 12) local conflicts including ethnic and sectional divisions resolved through community representative mechanisms with the support from formal and informal authorities and other stakeholders.
During the reporting period, 23 (out of the plan 24) local conflicts related to ethnic and sectional divisions resolved through community structures with the support from formal and informal authorities and other stakeholders. These are: Bor: (1) Fighting between Murle and Dinka communities resolved. As the result of this returned 11 abducted children to parents after the peace. (2) CAG members addressed disputes between Payuel and Poktap communities over land issues. (3) CAG members reconciled two youth groups from Korooi and Gualla communities fighting over land and (4) Conflict between Gaweer Nuer - Dinka over cattle theft addressed. As the result of this about 49 stolen cows retrieved and handed to their rightful owners. Rumbek: (5) CAG members resolved the conflict between Aluakluak and Geer communities. These communities are currently living peacefully. (6) Youth from two conflicted communities in Rumbek East shared grazing land for the first time after seven year of conflict after the peace dialogue. (7) Conflict between Padoor and Payibek sections of the Dinka addressed. As a result of this dialogue, the two communities are living peacefully together and they agreed to pay compensation fee for the families of the victims and (8) Conflict between Kook-awac and Pana-akorbil communities addressed. The two communities had been in conflict since 2017 in which over 20 got people killed from both sides and unspecified number of cattle raided. Warrap: (9) CAG members resolved a dispute between farmers and pastoralists in Gogrial. (10) Majak-tit CAG and border chiefs resolved family case in Majak-tit. (11) Payam administrator resolved the conflict between Thony and Muok communities and returned 12 stolen sheep to their owners. (12) Tharkueng CAG stopped intra-clan fighting over SGBV case and (13) Tensions between Marial-lou and Akop over administrative boundaries between the two newly created counties de-escalated. Wau: (14) Luo Farmers and Dinka Pastoralist communities agreed to cease hostilities and all forms of violence. As the part of the peace agreement 23 raided heads of cattle returned to the owners and IDPs back to their homes after displacement since March 2019 in Kuarjina County. Yambio: (15) CAG members reunited 16 couples who were official divorce in the court in Tambura and Yambio. (16) Trust and confidence between the civilians and organized forces strengthened and (17) Conflict between traditional chiefs and local government authorities over power competition addressed peacefully. Torit: (18) The conflict between Oguruny and Hafworiere communities reconciled. As the result the communities agreed to pay the compensate fee to the families of the victims. (19) Conflict between Lopit and Bira communities living in Lodikolong residential area resolved and (20) Conflict between Bur Payam and nomadic cattle keepers from Torit East County addressed through peace dialogue. Aweil: (21) Issues between community members and government authorities over lack of proper land management resolve. As the result of our engagement authorities agreed to include consultations with community members prior to any land surveys and allotments and established Land Committees in all the Payams and (22) Conflict between farmers and pastoralists at Apada addressed. Juba: (23) Conflict between farmers and pastoralists from Bari and Mundari communities that usually occurred during cattle migration season resolved.
During the project period, 60 (107%) local issues including ethnic and sectional divisions resolved through community structures with the support from formal and informal authorities and other stakeholders.
Output 1.2: Up to 39 new community action groups formed in 4 new and two existing locations, and 39 members drawn from various existing community action groups, trained to support the formation and development of new groups.
a) Number of new community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and others) established.
Number of new community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and Peace Committees) established both in new and existing locations. The community action groups comprise of 20-25 community representatives from the local leaders, youth groups, women’s groups, traders, educators, elderly, religious leaders, health service providers, and social workers (men and women) and others as both targets and beneficiaries.
To date, five (5) communities action groups established in three existing locations. Three (3) in Aweil, one (1) Tonj North and an other one (1) in Wau town.
During the reporting period, twenty-five (25) new community action groups (CAGs) were established out of the planned 27 (92%). The CAGs are established in two (2) new and nine (9) expansion locations across the eight former states in South Sudan. Each CAGs comprised of 25-30 members and meet on amonthly basis to discuss, prioritise, develop and implement action plans to address the community peace and security concerns. CAGs in Yirol that were supposed to be established this year, will be formed immediately after the CSA in the first quarter of next year. CAGs were not established in Yirol due to accessibility problems - the road between Rumbek and Yirol was closed and cut off by flooding from July to November.
During the reporting period, 9 (out of the plan 7) new Community Action Groups (CAGs) established in six locations. Two CAGs not established from last year were carried over to this year and that is why the performance is high. Each CAG comprised of 25-30 individuals from different social group (such as youth, women, religious leader, local leaders and etc.). The group meet on regularly bases to discuss and prioritize community issues and develop action plan to address their concerns.
During the project period, 39 (100%) new Community Action Groups (CAGs) established and supported. This makes the total number of CAGs supported during the project period is 74.
b) Percent of community action groups that include 25% youth, 25% women, religious leaders, elderly, local authorities and at least one member from every other local groups.
Percentage of community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and Peace Committees) that include different social groups to represent the communities where they are working for. The community action groups may include community leaders, youth groups, women’s groups, traders, educators, elderly, religious leaders, health service providers, and social workers and other social groups. Calculation: Numerator: Number of community action groups that includes 25% youth, 25% women, religious leader, elderly, local authorities and at least 1 member from every other local groups and Denominator: Total number of community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs and Peace Committees) established.
55% (21 out of 38) community action groups
At least 58% (25 out of 43) community action groups.
To date, 60% (26 out of 43) community action groups include 25% youth, 25% women, religious leaders, elderly, local authorities and at least one member from every other local groups.
At least 70% (49 out of 70) of the community action groups.
To date, 86% (56 out of 65) of existing community action groups include at least 25% youth, 25% women, and representatives of religious leaders, elderly, local authorities and one member from every other local group.
At least 88% (65 out of 74)
To date, 84% (62 out of 74) of existing community action groups fulfils the required standard. Most CAGs include at least 25% youth, 25% women, and representatives of religious leaders, elderly and local authorities. But this depending on the context where we work in. For example in Rumbek East and Aluakluak we have women only, youth only and chiefs only CAG members. In addition, in some locations we have women majority groups like Aweil and Rumbek Central and youth majority groups like in Juba.
At least 88% (65 out of 74)
During this reporting period, 84% (62 out of 74) of existing community action groups meet the required standard.
At least 88% (65 out of 74)
During this reporting period, 84% (62 out of 74) of community action groups meet the required standard.
Outcome 2: Formal and informal authorities and service providers, responsible for building peace and security and contributing to community resilience at the local- and state-levels, consult more with communities on peace and security issues, incorporate community concerns into their related responses, and operate to standards that are transparent, inclusive, and legitimate.
a) Number of community-level peace and security concerns, as identified by the communities that formal and informal authorities and service providers have helped to address in a coordinated manner.
Number of community-level security and peace concerns as initiated by the communities that formal and informal authorities and service providers have helped to address it in a coordinated manner. These are outcomes that show how the formal and informal authorities and service providers are taking community-level security and peace concerns into their response and agendas.
To date, 27 community-level peace and security concerns identified by the communities were addressed in a coordinated manner with the formal and informal authorities and service providers.
To date, 45 community-level peace and security concerns that identified by the communities addressed in a coordinated manner with the formal and informal authorities and service providers out of the planned 48 (94%).
During the reporting period, 54 (out of the plan 48) communities peace and security concerns were addressed by the formal and informal authorities and service providers in response to community requests.
During the reporting period, 30 (out of the plan 24) communities peace and security concerns addressed by formal and informal authorities in response to community request. Some of the community issues addressed by authorities among others are: In Bor, Murle community leaders and local authorities returned abducted 11 children to authorities and eventually to parents in Jonglei state. In Warrap, Payam administrator returned 12 stolen sheep to their owners in Malual-Muok, in response to the community request. In Wau, County Commissioner recovered 23 raided heads of cattle and returned to the owners in Kuarjina county and State police commissioner deployed a squad (11 troopers) of police men and women after meeting CAGs and chiefs in Agok area. In Rumbek, Chiefs convinced youth to stop exchanged of stolen cows at the border in Aluaklauk and State Governor bans carrying of guns along the major road in Rumbek Centre.
During the project period, 156 (108%) community peace and security concerns addressed by formal and informal authorities in response to the community request.
b) Percentage of the community action groups (CAGs) who perceive the formal and informal authorities, and service providers are more responsive to their needs and priorities in the last 12 months.
Perception of the community action groups (CSWGs, PCRCs, and Peace Committees) towards the formal and informal authorities and service providers relationship with communities to consult them on peace and security issues, incorporate community concerns into their related responses, and agendas. The regular perception ranking survey with 1-5 ranking scale will be used to get the community’s perceptions through the existing CAGs. The ranking scales are: 1=Getting much worse, 2=Getting a little worse, 3=The same as before, 4=Improving a little and, 5=Improving a lot.
35% (13 out of 38)
At least 45% (17 out of 38)
At the end of six months, about 35% (12 out of 34) of the CAGs perceived that the relationship between formal and informal authorities and communities has been improved. Whilst almost all CAGs in Juba, Yambio, and Torit reported a poor relationships with their authorities after the July-2016 conflict.
At least 60% (26 out of 43)
About 79% (35 out of 44) of the CAGs participated in the assessment believe that their relationship between the formal and informal authorities has been improved. In addition, all CAGs in Juba, Yambio, and Torit perceived that their relationship with authorities has been improved compared to last year, where almost all of them reported very poor relationships in similar assessments.
At least 62% (46 out of 74)
About 78% (58 out of 74) of the CAGs perceived that the formal and informal authorities relationship with community has been improved in the last 12 months.
At least 81% (59 out of 74)
About 82% (61 out of 74) of the CAGs perceived that the formal and informal authorities were more responsive to their needs and priorities in the past 12 months.
At least 81% (59 out of 74)
About 82% (61 out of 74) of the CAGs perceived that the formal and informal authorities were more responsive to their needs and priorities in the past 12 months.
Outcome 3: CSO partners and other civil society actors, individually and collectively, plan, facilitate, and implement conflict- and gender-sensitive community security and peacebuilding programming in conjunction with other actors (including formal and informal authorities and service providers). They advocate on behalf of communities for transparent and accountable policies and services contributing to community resilience at the local, state, regional, and national levels.
a) Level of knowledge and capacity of the CSO partners in the provision of community security.
Skills and capacities of the CSO partners to independently design and manage community security and peace programme. It basically uses ranking scales from 1- 4 to measure the skills and capacities of the partners to develop and implement organizational strategic plan, annual work plan, project proposal and monitoring and evaluation systems in participatory ways.
4 CSO partners scored 3 and above on project design and management areas from the annual organisational capacity assessment.
This indicator will be reported in the next year. Organizational capacity assessment done on annual bases to measure this indicator (next one will be in November 2017).
This indicator will be reported in the next period - we conduct organisational capacity assessments on an annual basis to measure this indicator (next one will be in November 2017).
7 CSO partners working in 10 locations understood well community security approach, staff and volunteers trained for the work they do, and often provide training and support to others.
To date, 7 CSO partners working in 9 locations understood well basics of community security approach, staffs and volunteers trained for the work they do, and often provide training and support to others.
During the reporting period, 7 (out of the plan 8) CSO partners working in 12 locations equipped with the knowledge and have skills on community security programme approach. Staff and volunteers trained for the work they do, and often provide training and support to the communities and others.
During the reporting period, 8 (out of the plan 8) CSO partners working in 16 locations equipped with the knowledge and have skills on community security programme approach. Staff and volunteers trained for the work they do, and often provide training and support to the communities and others.
During the project period, 8 (100%) CSO partners working in 16 locations equipped with the knowledge and have skills on community security programme approach. Staff and volunteers trained for the work they do, and often provide training and support to the communities and others.
b) Level and capacity of CSO partners to influence formal and informal authorities and service providers to change their practices and/or policies compared to last year.
This indicator will be reported in the next year. Organizational capacity assessment done on annual bases to measure this indicator (next one will be in November 2017).
This indicator will be reported in the next year. Organizational capacity assessment done on annual bases to measure this indicator (next one will be in November 2017).
4 CSO partners have done convincing evidence or consultation-based advocacy or mobilized allies to change practices or policies.
During the reporting period, about 3 CSO partners have done more than one convincing, consultation based advocacy to change the practices of local authorities and service providers on peace and reconciliation out of the planned 4 (75%).
During the reporting period, 15 (out of the plan 12) successful advocacy initiatives carried out by CSO partners that to influence the practices and/or policies of formal and informal authorities and service providers.
During the reporting period, 6 (out of the plan 8) advocacy initiatives carried out by partner CSOs helped to influence/change the practices and/or policies of formal and informal authorities and service providers at different level.
During the project period, 38 (95%) advocacy initiatives carried out by CSO partners helped to influence/change the practices and/or policies of formal and informal authorities and service providers at different level.
Outcome 4: National and international actors (national authorities, donors, INGOs, and multi-laterals), listen to community-level peace and security priorities and start to integrate those priorities into national- and international-level policies, practices, and intervention strategies.
a) Number of national and international actors that take on board community-level peace and security priorities and integrated those priorities into their national and international level policies, practices and interventions strategies.
Number of national and international actors that take on board community-level peace and security priorities and integrated those priorities into their national and international level policies, practices and interventions strategies. Conflict-Sensitivity Resource Facility (CSRF) programme will support our ability to influence international actors on this regards. In addition our work on China will be folded into this, and linked to state-level advocacy through any development plans that affect particular areas and are the result of Chinese investment, contractors, etc.
This indicator will be reported in year 3.
This indicator will be reported in year 3.
This indicator will be reported in year 3.
This indicator will be reported in year 3.
During the reporting period, 2 (out of plan 4) actors took on board Saferworld Community Security Approach into their strategies. (1) Spokesperson of South Sudan Nation Police Service (SSNPS) assigned the director for community policing to directly work on Community Security and Peace (CSP) programme at national level. (2) UNMISS adopted Saferworld’s approach of roundtable discussion as means of promoting peace among communities within the PoC site in Wau. In October, UNMISS Civil Affairs Officer participated in the state roundtable event organized by Saferworld. The event provided opportunity to participants including government’s ministers, army commanders in Wau, CSOs, INGOs, UN agencies and communities to deliberate and addressed jointly causes of insecurity in the state. As a result of this UNMISS Civil Affairs department organized similar event in Wau. The target was not reached due to the frequent reshuffling of the government officials which impacted negatively on planned activities and relationships established with these authorities.
During the reporting period, 5 (out of plan 3) actors take on board community-level peace and security priorities and integrated those priorities into their policies, practices and interventions strategies. For example, following the national roundtable event, the Speaker of the State Legislative Assembly in Rumbek who attended the event, returned and instituted the following changes in the assembly: • The speaker reshuffled leadership positions in the state assembly by appointing more women into senior leadership positions including Deputy Speaker, Chief Whip and 6 chairpersons (out of 12) of parliamentary specialised committees. The speaker made these changes as a way to improve women’s participation in decision-making including on peace and security issues, at the state assembly, being one of the issues discussed at the event in Juba. • The speaker tabled a proposal to the state governor to establish three special courts to handle issues of cattle rustling, inter-/intra-communal violence and land disputes as a way to implement the recommendations of the Juba event on those issues. • Furthermore, the speaker tabled a bill to establish state revenue authority, a body that would help harmonize tax collection and reduce multiple taxation in the state, an issue that was discussed in the Juba event as one of the causes of high commodity prices in the local market in Rumbek. • The speaker also reported that, after participating in the Juba roundtable event, he successfully advocated with the state governor for the removal of multiple road blocks in the state where commercial vehicles and traders were being obliged to pay multiple taxes resulting in high prices of commodities in the market. • The speaker further reported that he was working with members of the state assembly in Rumbek to revitalize the Lakes State Customary Act 2011 which punishes perpetrators of hate speech, communal violence, cattle raids and composers of songs that exonerate these crimes.
During the project period, 7 (100%) national and international actors take on board community-level peace and security priorities and integrated those priorities into their policies, practices and interventions strategies.
Output 2.1: Up to 32 representatives from formal and informal authorities and service providers responsible for maintaining security and contributing to community resilience are working collaboratively with, and/or seeking advice from, communities and CSOs to address community concerns and implement actions to resolve issues.
Number of county-levels meeting/discussion forums conducted between formal and informal authorities, service providers and CAGs to incorporate community peace and security concerns in to their response.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period, a total of fourteen (14) county-level roundtables conducted out of the planned 15(93%). The roundtables conducted between the formal and informal authorities, service providers and CAGs to incorporate community peace and security concerns in to their response and agenda at the local-level.
During the reporting period, 12 (out of the plan 16) county-level roundtables conducted across the 16 programme locations. County-level meeting not conduct in three locations (Tambura, Aluakluak and Rumbek East) due to insecurity during the reporting.
During the project period, 26 (81%) count-level roundtable conducted between formal and informal authorities, service providers and CAGs to incorporate community peace and security concerns in to their response.
b) Number of invitations to meetings issued to the CAGs and/or CSO partners from formal and informal authorities and service providers to consult on community peace and security issues and to incorporate community concerns into their responses.
Number of invitations to meetings issued to the community action groups (CAGs) representatives and/or CSOs partner from formal and informal authorities and service providers (as indicated in the actor mappings) to consult them on community peace and security concerns and to incorporate community concerns into their responses and agendas.
To date, twenty (20) invitations meetings issued to the CAGs and/or CSO partners from formal and informal authorities and service providers. These invitations were issued at different times for our CAG members from Aweil Manicipal, Ministry of health and NRC in Aweil, Torit Manicipal Mayor, SNV and Care international in Torit and local authorities in Bor.
During the reporting period, thirty-two (32) invitations meetings issued to the CAGs and/or our CSO partners from formal and informal authorities and service providers to consult them in different community issues and concerns out of the planned 43 (74%).
During the reporting period, 72 (out of the plan 70) invitation meetings made to the CAGs from formal and informal authorities and service providers at different levels to consult them on community peace and security issues and to incorporate it into their responses and agenda.
During the reporting period, 18 (out of the plan 24) invitation meetings made to the CAGs from formal and informal authorities and service providers at different level to consult them on community peace and security issues and to incorporate it into their responses and agenda. The some of the meaningful consultation meetings made to CAGs among many others are: In Bor, the county commissioner of Duk requested and consulted with the CAGs to facilitate community dialogue between Lou-Nuer and Dinka youth at the onset of a migration season. The commissioner invited CAGs leaders to deliberate with them on what he needed to be done to address a security concern at the time and Leaders of Hai-Machuor CAGs were asked to work with humanitarian organisations in their location to identify vulnerable people to receive seeds. In Torit, The Block Chief invited representatives of our CAG in Ilangi to deliberate on strategies of dealing with the insecurity caused by ‘Niggers’. The Director General, State Ministry of Local Government and Law Enforcement together with UNDP always invites the Chair of Fodo-Fodo CAG to deliberate on challenges facing residents in regard to law enforcement–with particular emphasis on GBV and The Commissioner of defunct Torit East County consulted our CAGs in Hiyala on how to address abuse of alcohol and domestic violence.
During the project period, 142 (92%) invitation meetings made to the CAGs (Partners) from formal and informal authorities and service providers to consult them on community peace and security issues and to incorporate it into their responses and agenda.
Output 3.1: At least 9 CSO partners demonstrate improved capacity in conducting CSAs (linked to Output 1.1), disseminating them, developing action plans, advocating with local and state authorities, and designing dialogue processes and awareness-raising to promote peacebuilding and reconciliation.
Number of community security assessments (CSAs) conducted by CSO partners with no/minimum support from Saferworld.
Number of CSO partners who have the skills and confidence to conduct community security assessment (CSA), and conducted DEG II final CSA with no/minimum support from Saferworld, in a conflict- and gender-sensitive manner.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period, 12 (out of the plan 12) Community Security Assessments (CSAs) conducted in the existing location all led by our CSO partners with minimum support with Saferworld staff at the ground.
During the reporting period, 4 CSA validation workshop (out of the plan 4) led by our CSO partners with minimum support with Saferworld staff.
During the project period, 16 (100%) CSAs conducted and/or validated by CSO partners with no/minimum support from Saferworld.
b) Number of individual CSO partner updated/developed and implemented state-level advocacy strategy plans.
Number of CSO partners who developed/updated and implemented state-level advocacy strategy plan.
All states started updating the previous advocacy strategy plans. During the reporting period 3 CSOs working in 4 states were also implementing the old version.
By now, 7 CSO across the former 8 states are using the revised and updated advocacy strategy plan 2017 to engage with state authorities on peace and security issues affecting the communities at county and state levels. With exception of Wau where activities were stranded for a while, the state level strategies have been effective in bringing peace and security issues to state authorities and highlighting better ways to deal with conflict and safety situations and used as basis of engaging CSO actors and other international organizations.
During the reporting period, 8 (out of the plan 9) CSOs partners have updated their state level advocacy strategies. All were using the strategy to engage with state authorities on peace and security issues affecting the communities at county and state levels. The state level strategies have been effective in bringing peace and security issues to state authorities and highlighting better ways to deal with conflict and safety situations. The project has 8 CSO partners and all have updated their state level advocacy strategies. The target of 9 was set at the beginning of the project with anticipation of having 9 partners.
During the reporting period, 8 (out of the plan 8) CSOs partners have updated their state level advocacy strategies. All using the strategy to engage with state authorities on peace and security issues affecting the communities at county and state levels. The state level strategies have been effective in bringing peace and security issues to state authorities and highlighting better ways to deal with conflict and safety situations.
During the project period, 8 (100%) CSOs partners have developed and updated their state level advocacy strategies. All CSOs using the strategy to engage with state authorities on peace and security issues affecting the communities at county and state levels.
Output 3.2: Up to 8 civil society platforms at the state-level (new or existing) engage regularly with local and national actors (formal and informal authorities, state and non-state security providers, and other service providers) on conflict- and gender- sensitive and context-specific approaches to peace, security and community resilience, as well as raising the profile of key peace and security issues.
a) Number of state-level civil society platforms supported to advocate on community peace and security.
(Disaggregated by the number and types of CSOs)
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
8 state-level platforms
Saferworld engaged with all the former eight (8) state-level CSO platforms and networks. During the reporting period except Juba, Saferworld organised and facilitated different workshops in each states to bring members of CSOs platforms together to discuss key challenges, opportunities and to strengthen their capacity on advocacy and networking. As a part of capacity building, Saferworld also trained member civil society organisations, mostly organizations’ heads, on peacebuilding and advocacy in Bor and Yambio programme locations.
During the reporting period, 7 (out of the plan 8) state level CSO platforms have been supported, except in Juba where there is a plethora of CSO platforms.
During the reporting period, 8 (out of the plan 8) state level CSO platforms have been supported.
During the reporting period, 8 (100%) state level CSO platforms have been established and/or supported.
b) Number of civil society organisations represented in 2 days national-level advocacy event.
Disaggregated by civil society organisation, sex of participants.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period, 18 (out of the plan 15) CSOs from states’ platforms and some national organisations as well as Faith Based Group participated in a three day national Civil Society Forum in Juba. The forum reached 34 (25 male and 9 women) representatives from 18 different CSOs across the former eight states in South Sudan. The objective of the forum was to provide civil society representatives an opportunity to collectively link state level discussions on peace, security, justice and reconciliation to national level debates on pertinent issues of peace and security.
15 CSOs (21 participants)
During the reporting period, 16 (out of the plan 15) CSOs from states’ platforms and national organisations participated in one day national forum in Juba. The forum reached 31 (20 male and 11 women) representatives from 16 different CSOs across the eight states in South Sudan. The objective of the forum was to provide civil society representatives an opportunity to collectively link state level discussions on peace, security, justice and reconciliation to national level debates on pertinent issues of peace and security.
30 CSOs (42 participants)
During the reporting period, 34 (113%) CSOs from states’ platforms and national organisations participated in 2 national forums in Juba. The objective of the forums was to provide civil society representatives an opportunity to collectively link state level discussions on peace, security, justice and reconciliation to national level debates on pertinent issues of peace and security.
c) Number of joint actions made by civil society platforms to advocate for policy changes on community-based peace and security approach at the national-level.
Number of joint actions and/or briefing papers with recommendations produced from the national-level civil society forums and disseminated to advocate for policy changes on peace, security and resilience at the national-level.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
1 briefing papers with recommendations produced and disseminated.
During the reporting period, 1 (out of the plan 1) briefing papers published following the national-level Civil Society Forums in Juba.
1 briefing papers with recommendations produced and disseminated
During the reporting period, 1 briefing paper (out of the plan 1) produced and disseminated.
2 briefing papers with recommendations produced and disseminated.
During the project period, 2 briefing papers (100%) produced and disseminated.
Output 2.2: Formal and informal authorities and service providers responsible for maintaining security and contributing to community resilience at the local- and state-levels, produce [and share], with communities, joint recommendations to support transparent, inclusive, and legitimate action on peace, security and community resilience.
Number of state-level round tables (2-days) conducted between the formal and informal authorities, service providers and CSOs to identify and discuss key peace and security issues from the CSAs and state-level advocacy strategies.
a) Number of state-level roundtables (2-days) conducted with the formal and informal authorities, service providers, and community action group representatives to identify and discuss key peace and security issues from the CSAs and state-level advocacy strategies. These roundtables designed to brings county-level community peace and security concerns into state level.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period, a total of eight (8) state-level roundtables conducted out of the planned 16(50%). The stat-level roundtables conducted between the formal and informal authorities, service providers, CSOs and community representatives to identify and discuss key peace and security issues from the CSAs and state-level advocacy strategies.
During the reporting period, 6 (out of the plan 12) state roundtables conducted. State-level round table not conducted in the six locations due to insecurity (in Rumbek East and Aluakluak) and due to some operational challenges (in Aweil and Yambio).
12 (carried over from the previous years)
During the reporting period, 10 (out of the plan 12) state roundtables conducted. These roundtables conducted in Rumbek, Yambio, Tambura, Torit, Juba, Aweil East, Kuajok, Tonj, and Wau.
During the project period, 24 (75%) state-level roundtable conducted between the formal and informal authorities, service providers and CSOs to identify and discuss key peace and security issues from the CSAs and state-level advocacy strategies.
b) Number of joint actions made by state-level round tables between formal and informal authorities, service providers and CSOs to advocate for policy changes on community-based peace and security approach at the state and national-level.
Number of state-level briefing papers with recommendations (from 2-days state-level roundtables) produced and shared with formal and informal authorities, service providers, and the community action groups to advocate for policy changes on peace, security and resilience at local- and state-levels.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
4 briefing papers produced and disseminated periods.
During the reporting period, four (4) state-level briefing papers published after the state-level formal and informal authorities’ roundtable discussion in four locations (Juba, Torit, Rumbek and Bor). The papers are intended to inform wider population and stakeholders on pertinent issues affecting safety and security situation in a given state, recommend solutions to the problems and advocate for policy changes on peace and security both at state and national levels. The papers have been disseminated in all states and used as basis for our evidence base advocacy works.
During the reporting period, 3 (out of the plan 4) state briefing papers were published following the state round table discussion in three locations (Warrap, Wau and Yambio). The papers are intended to inform wider population and stakeholders on pertinent issues that affecting people safety and security in the state, recommend solutions to the problems and advocate for policy changes on peace and security both at state and national levels. The papers have been disseminated in all states except Wau to be done in 2019. The target of was not reached due to operational challenges in Aweil, the round table is to be conducted in 2019.
During the reporting period, 1 state-level briefing paper produced in Aweil which was carried over from last year.
During the reporting period, 8 (100%) state briefing papers published following the state roundtable discussion in all the eight locations. The papers are intended to inform authorities and wider stakeholders on pertinent issues that affecting people safety and security in the state, recommend solutions to the problems and advocate for policy changes on peace and security both at state and national levels. The papers have been disseminated in all states and used as basis for our evidence base advocacy works.
Output 1.3: Up to 169 (including 77 seed funded) community action plans initiated by community action groups (established and new), that are conflict- and gender- sensitive, and support practical responses and proactive solutions to identified security and peace-building / reconciliation priorities.
a) Number of community action plans/practical response made (including seed fund) to address prioritised community peace and security concerns in a conflict-and gender-sensitive manner.
Disaggregated by action plan and community action group. Number of action plans/practical responses including the seed fund grant that the community action groups develop and implemented to address the prioritized community security and peace concerns in a conflict and gender sensitivity manner.
To date, eight (8) action plan developed and implemented by the community action groups. Of these half (4) of the action plans were in Torit, two (2) in Wau and Rumbek and Warrap CAGs implemented one each.
During the reporting period, eighty (80) Community Action Plans (CAPs) developed and implemented by community action groups (CAGs) out of the planned 70 (114%). Out of these 38 were seed funded action plans where Saferworld directly provided a financial support to the CAGs to address their local-level conflicts and insecurty concerns.
During the reporting period, 121 (out of the planned 77) Community Action Plans (CAPs) implemented by CAGs across the 16 locations. Out of these, 30 action plans were seed-funded and the remaining 91 action plans were implemented by the communities. Communities in Juba (7 CAGs) implemented highest number of action plans, which is 18, compared to other locations. This is followed by CAGs in Torit and Yambio each implemented 14 action plans during the reporting period. CAGs in Rumbek East and Duk implemented less number of action plans, 4 and 3 respectively, compared to other communities. This is due to the protracted security in Rumbek East and late establishment of CAGs in Duk. CAGs established 2-3 years ago are more engaging and addressing their peace and security concerns as a result of the skills and experience acquired during the programme – this is why they managed to implement more number of action plans.
During the reporting period, 55 (out of the planned 98) Community Action Plans (CAPs) implemented by CAGs across the 16 locations. Out of these, 38 (69%) action plans were initiated and implemented by CAGs without direct support from Saferworld nor its partners, while 17(31%) action plans were supported by our ‘seed fund’ facility.
During the project period, 264 (104%) community action plans implemented through 74 CAGs. Out of these, 179 (68%) action plans were initiated and implemented by CAGs without direct support from Saferworld nor its partners, while 85 (32%) action plans were supported by our ‘seed fund’ facility.
b) Number of community action plans/practical responses initiated by community that received additional or alternative support (resources, in-kind contributions etc.) from formal and informal authorities, service providers and other actors.
All the eight (8) action plan implemented during this period were with the support of local authorities and service providers. Data disaggregation shows: local authorities supported six (6) of the action plans and service provider (Norwegian Church Aid -NCA) supported the remaining to action plans action plans.
During the reporting period, fourty-two (42) CAPs developed and implemented by the CAGs initiatives without direct finacial support from Saferworl out of the expected 32 (131%). This is one of our sustainable strategy to make sure that our CAGs can continue their workes with small support and contribution getting from different formal and informal authorities and service providers to implement their action plans.
During the reporting period, 54 (out of the plan 35) community action plans were implemented with the full support (resources, in-kind contributions and etc.) got from formal and informal authorities and service providers.
During the reporting period, 32 (out of the plan 45) community action plans implemented with the additional support (resources, in-kind contributions and etc.) received from formal and informal authorities and service providers. One of the best example of support and coordination is the following: The Luo farmers and Dinka pastoralists have been engaged in conflict since 2016. Several peace initiatives have been undertaken to resolve conflict and reconcile the two communities, however, there has always been resurgence of the violent conflict. The latest violence clashes erupted in March 2019 leading to loss of lives, destruction of property, massive displacement and closure of roads leading into/out of Wau town further denying the surrounding communities services in Wau. Saferworld together with UNMISS, CAD, CEPO, CARDO, Malteser International, NP and government pooled resources and organised peace conference from 3 to 6 July 2019. As the result the two communities signed the latest round of peace agreement to end conflict. The agreement has so far resulted to ceasing hostilities. Since then, there has never been report of attacks and displaced civilians are returning to their homes, roads have been open and people are moving freely in/out of Wau, and people from outside can now access goods and services in Wau town due to road opening. As the part of the peace agreement about 23 raided heads of cattle recovered and returned to the owners in Kuarjina County.
During the project period, 136 (117%) community action plans implemented with additional support (resources, in-kind contributions and etc.) received from formal and informal authorities and/or service providers.
c) Number of community action plans/practical responses initiated by the community that address gender-related peace and security concerns at the local-level.
Number of action plans/practical responses including the seed fund grant that the community action groups develop and implemented to address any gender-related community peace and security issues at the local-level.
To date, no gender-related action plans implemented by the CAGs. Some of the CAGs already planned to implement gender-related issues in the next reporting period using the seed fund grants.
During the reporting period, sixteen (16) gender related action plans developed and implemented by out of the planned 14 (114%). As a part of gender action plans, 10 awareness-raising campaign on prevention of GBV, case reporting, access to service and community-based referral pathways conducted in six locations. Capacity building training given to 363 participants (318 females and 45 males) on Gender and Conflict in Bor, Rumbek, Aweil, Yambio and Wau to empower and promote women engagement with peace-building and conflict resolution. Three days of inter-state women peace dialogue conducted in Rumbek Central to address new dynamics of conflict drivers related to incidences of cattle raiding and revenge killings.
During the reporting period, 18 (out of the plan 15) gender-specific action plans were implemented across all the 16 locations. The action plans were implemented in Juba, Torit, Yambio, Rumbek, Tambura, Bor and Warrap.
During the reporting period, 10 (out of the plan 11) gender-specific action plans implemented. The action plans were implemented in Bor, Juba, Torit, Tambura, Yambio and Warrap. All the action plans aimed at raising awareness of the community and empowering girls and women. For example in Yambio, 3-days dialogue conducted among 60 couples coming from 7 locations to discuss around divorce and family issues. As the result of this 16 couples who were officially divorced in the court reunited. In Torit, following CAGs awareness-raising campaign on GBV and domestic violence community established Nyong Women Group (NWG). NWG use as platform for women to discuss their peace and security issues and to provide advice and counselling to the GBV survivors. In Tambura, awareness-raising campaign on GBV conducted in which approximately 600 people (400 females and 200 males) participated. The purpose of the campaign was to disseminate the recommendations of a community peace dialogue conducted earlier to address issues of sexual and gender-based violence and child protection.
During the project period, 44 (105%) gender-specific action plans implemented to address gender-related peace and security concerns.
Output 1.1: Up to 20 community security assessments (CSAs) completed, analysed, and disseminated to local-level stakeholders, and used to inform community action plans, dialogues, debates, advocacy, and awareness-raising activities.
a) Number of new community security assessments (CSA) conducted and disseminated.
Number of baseline (in 4 new locations) and end-line (in all 16 locations) community security assessment (CSA) conducted to inform community security and peace programme action plans, dialogues, debates, advocacy, and awareness-raising activities and measure the progress made to the expected results.
Full CSA was not planned and conducted for this period as we were expanding in the existing/transitional location. But DEG-I final CSA findings were validated to identify and update the context change in all programme location.
During the reporting period, two (2) Community Security Assessments (CSAs) were conducted in two new locations, in Tambura and Aweil East out of the planned 4 (50%). In Wau, CSA was not conducted due to political turmoil in the state. In Yirol West, CSA was not conducted due to accessibility problems, the road between Rumbek and Yirol was closed and cut off by flooding from July to November. CSA in both locations planned to conduct in the firs quarter of the next reporting period.
During the reporting period, all 14 planned Community Security Assessments (CSAs) were conducted. The CSAs were conducted in all existing (12) and 2 new locations (Aluakluak in Yirol and Duk in Bor).
During the reporting period, 4 CSA validation workshop (out of the plan 4) conducted. During this period CSA dissemination workshop also conducted across the 7 programme location to inform community action plans that would be relevant and responsive to the evolving and emerging needs of the communities.
During the project period 20 (100%) Community Security Assessments (CSAs) conducted and all the reports disseminated to all stakeholders at different level.
Output 4.1: Joint recommendations for more inclusive and effective peace and security provision drafted by CSWG, PCRC, and other community action group members, civil society organisations, academic institutions, national institutions, and international donors.
a) Number of relevant national and international actors in South Sudan reached by national-level roundtables.
Disaggregated by organisation, sex of participants; Number of national-level roundtables (3-days) conducted to bring together key national and international actors in South Sudan in order to raise awareness of key peace and security issues.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period, 123 (83 male and 40 female) participants from the community representatives, Civil Society members, state officials, national government officials, donor community, international non-governmental organizations, UN agencies and members of the organized forces (police and the army) attended the event in Juba. The event was attended by senior national government officials including speaker of national parliament and chairperson of the Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control as well as the deputy head of mission of the embassy of the Netherlands.
During the reporting period, 123 (83 male and 40 female) participants from the community representatives, Civil Society members, state officials, national government officials, donor community, international non-governmental organizations, UN agencies and members of the organized forces (police and the army) attended the event in Juba. The event was attended by senior national government officials including speaker of national parliament and chairperson of the Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control as well as the deputy head of mission of the embassy of the Netherlands.
Number of briefing papers on cross-cutting community peace and security issues produced and disseminated.
Number of briefing papers with recommendations produced from the national-level forums with key national and international actors and disseminated to advocate for policy changes on community peace and security at the national-level.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
1 briefing papers on cross-cutting community peace and security issues produced and disseminated. periods.
This indicator will be reported on only in the next reporting periods.
During the reporting period, 1 briefing paper (out of the plan 1) on cross-cutting community peace and security issues produced and disseminated.
During the project period, 1 briefing paper (100%) on cross-cutting community peace and security issues produced and disseminated.
GB-CHC-1043843-CA-START_O001
Saferworld
Linking Preparedness, Response and Resilience in Emergency Contexts
This proposal seeks to promote resilient humanitarian responses. It has a focus at the community level. The project has two strands, both associated with new ways of strengthening community resilience. The first strand will study a range of recent humanitarian responses and develop an approach for designing humanitarian responses that maximises the long-term resilience of beneficiary communities. The project will then test this new approach in a future humanitarian response. Secondly, the project will bring together humanitarian and security agencies to combine their best existing methodologies for security and resilience to develop new approaches for resilience programming in fragile contexts. The new approaches will be developed and piloted in close consultation with local partners and country teams.
Christian Aid
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
10151
10151
10150
30452
Christian Aid
Saferworld
21502
Christian Aid
Saferworld
1777
Saferworld
2313
Saferworld
7362
Saferworld
7047
Saferworld
321
Saferworld
1166
Saferworld
4732
Saferworld
642
Saferworld
1139
Saferworld
8950
Christian Aid
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-NetherlandsEmbassyYemen_F020_4000000254
Saferworld
Enhancing Peacebuilding Mechanisms in Yemen
The outcome of this project will be to ensure that communities, civil society and local authorities in target locations, including marginalised groups such as women and youth, work together across conflict divides to improve peace and stability and/or work to mitigate the impact of the conflict in their local areas. This will contribute to the wider impact of ensuring communities across Yemen become more stable and resilient to shocks, and creating the conditions for long-term development and poverty reduction.
Four to six communities in Yemen, including women, youth and other marginalised groups, to be selected through feasibility studies and research; Yemeni peacebuilding CSOs and NGOs.
Netherlands Embassy Yemen
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
465039
425211
68272
307567
Saferworld
408996
421978
Netherlands Embassy Yemen
Saferworld
400000
Netherlands Embassy Yemen
Saferworld
890250
Netherlands Embassy Yemen
Saferworld
101689
Saferworld
Impact - Communities across Yemen are more stable and resilient to shocks, creating the conditions for long-term development and poverty reduction.
Score on Fragile States Index
http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/country-data/
Global Peace Index Ranking
Outcome 1 - Communities, civil society and local authorities in target locations, including marginalised groups such as women and youth, work together across conflict divides to improve peace and stability and/or work to mitigate the impact of the conflict in their local areas.
Percentage of project stakeholders (community peacebuilding groups, CSOs and Advisory Groups) that report initiatives effectively addressed their target issue
Percentage of project stakeholders who report increased trust and cooperation within the community
Number and percentage of community peacebuilding group members who feel that local council representatives are more responsive to community needs (including issues affecting marginalised groups)
30%
Output 2 - Local councils in four to six communities are more aware of community needs and are cooperating with community peacebuilding groups in responding to conflict issues and causes of insecurity, including women's specific concerns.
Number of Advisory Groups (AGs) established and receiving support/training on peace and conflict concepts (e.g. conflict-sensitivity)
4 groups established; Groups attend community peacebuilding group capacity-building training, receiving training on peace and conflict concepts and gender sensitivity
2 Advisory Groups (AGs) established by NODS in Taiz, and attending community peacebuilding groups capacity building training on peace and conflict concepts and practical skills. 2 advisory committees formed by Alf Ba in Aden.* * The advisory committees were planned to receive capacity building training in February 2020.
Number of meetings between AGs/Local Council members and community peacebuilding groups
28 meetings and consultations held between community peacebuilding groups and AGs/formal and informal authorities.
Number of Advisory Group members that participate in and/or support the implementation of action plans/initiatives
Disaggregated by: Location; type of support
20 Advisory Group members in Taiz, 4 advisory committee members in Aden, and 4 advisory committee members in Abyan participating in: defining roles and responsibilities; trainings; community dialogues; facilitations with authorities and the wider community; discussions to identify and prioritise issues and supporting the development of action plans.
Output 4 - International NGOs, donors and multilateral agencies provide greater support to local peacebuilding, as a result of more information on local peacebuilding activities and conflict dynamics, greater contact with diverse Yemeni peacebuilders across the country, and access to models and lessons for peacebuilding during both ‘hot’ and post-conflict phases.
Advocacy meetings by Saferworld with international actors to share information on local peacebuilding activities and conflict dynamics
Saferworld held 110 advocacy meetings during the duration of this project with different international stakeholders on Yemen peace and security issues.
International stakeholders requesting Saferworld briefings on Yemen and/or feeding back these are useful/informative
76 international stakeholders requested briefings, inputs and participation from Saferworld on Yemen peacebuilding and conflict dynamics. 28 stakeholders fedback these were useful and informed their advocacy and intervention strategies (including parliamentarians and DFID officials)
Output 1 - Four to six communities, including women, youth and other marginalised groups, are collaborating with community peacebuilding groups and engaging in inclusive peacebuilding responses to local conflict issues and causes of insecurity; and are more resilient to conflict challenges and shocks.
Number of community peacebuilding groups established
6 new groups established;
2 new groups were established, 27 supported and received grants
Community peacebuilding groups have at least 40% women members and women have leadership positions within the groups when implementing action plans.
40% women
At least 48% women members participating in Taiz community action groups with NODS. At least 40% women members participating in Taiz community initiative groups with YWBOD. At least 40% women members participating in Aden and Abyan initiative groups with Alf Ba.
Number of action plans produced and implemented (including seed grants) which respond to concerns raised through community consultations.
6 action plans were produced and implemented by the community action groups in al-Qahira and Sabr al-Mawadem districts in Taiz with NODS. 12 action plans were produced and implemented by the initiative groups supported by Alf Ba in Aden and Abyan. 21 action plans were produced and implemented by the initiative groups supported by YWBOD in al-Muthaffar, al-Qahira and Sala districts in Taiz.
Number of community peacebuilding groups trained on peace and conflict concepts (including conflict- and gender-sensitivity), and practical skills (e.g. facilitation, problem analysis and action planning, budget design, monitoring, and advocacy)
49 groups received trainings on peace and conflict concepts and practical skills, in Taiz, Aden and Abyan.
Output 3 - Yemeni CSOs and NGOs in the Saferworld peacebuilding network are conducting more peacebuilding activities, working together more collaboratively with other CSOs, including across conflict divides, and contributing to a pool of programming models and resources for local peacebuilding
Number of coordination meetings and/or roundtables with CSOs at governorate and national levels, including representation of women-led organisations.
8 coordination meetings; 20 women-led organisations participate
8 coordination meetings with Yemeni CSOs in 2018, including: 4 with the UN Protection Cluster (3 Yemeni CSOs participated, of which 1 was a women-led CSO); 1 with UNICEF; 1 with CSOs on Yemen advocacy working group with Crisis Action; 1 with Yemeni CSOs and Oxfam; 1 Coordination meeting with 6 Yemeni CSOs and NGOs working in Yemen discussing gender- and conflict-sensitivity (1 women-led organisation). 7 coordination meetings with Yemeni CSOs and INGOs in 2019, including: 1 focus group discussion with representatives from volunteer initiative groups in Abyan; 1 introductory meeting with initiative groups in Aden and Abyan about the objectives of the programme; 1 coordination meeting between NODS and INGOs in Taiz; 2 coordination meetings in Sabr al-Mawadem and al-Qahira districts in Taiz bringing together the community action groups with other initiative groups in the two districts; 1 learning & review workshop in Addis Ababa bringing together NODS, Alf Ba, YWBOD and Saferworld; 1 coordination workshop bringing together the 12 initiative groups working with Alf Ba from Aden and Abyan.
Number of resources and programming examples/peacebuilding models shared by CSOs within the CSO network
18 resources or programming models shared in the CSO network
Community programming experiences /models shared by Taiz-based CSO staff and former programme participants with Adeni CSO and government participants (at programme planning and methodology workshop). Participatory Action Learning in Conflict and small granting methodologies and approaches shared between Saferworld, Alf Ba, NODS and government participants (at methodology workshop). Conflict and gender sensitivity analysis methdos, and participatory action learning in conflict shared with 6 Yemeni CSOs (at Amman workshop). The experiences of each of NODS, Alf Ba and YWBOD in their distinct approaches to community security throughout the programme were shared during the learning and review workshop in November 2019. NODS exchanged experiences and working models with INGOs in Taiz. A voluntary initiative by a community group in Taiz was inspired by the initiative of the community action group in Sabr al-Mawadem district to fix secondary roads, and replicated the activity in their district.
Number of peacebuilding initiatives (e.g. awareness raising, advocacy) implemented by CSO network at governorate or national level (including through peacebuilding grants)
11
YWBOD participated in a joint advocacy campaign with other CSOs in Taiz to lift the siege on Taiz. Alf Ba and YWBOD participated in the 16 days of activism against gender based violence campaign.
GB-CHC-1043843-DFID_A012_300358-102
Saferworld
Peace Research Partnership
Conciliation Resources, International Alert and Saferworld propose a three-year programme in which the three organisations will leverage their combined 75 years’ experience building peace across the world to provide evidence-based policy and programming recommendations to DFID and other peace, security and development actors. Through practice-based research the programme will analyse and draw lessons from interventions to address conflict drivers implemented by consortium partners and other external actors, in order to generate new understanding, practical lessons and actionable policies. It will build upon the consortium partners’ strong track record of research and programming in conflict-affected states, and their wide policy and practitioner networks. The programme will focus on issues prioritised in the UK’s SDSR and Building Stability frameworks, including economic development, peace processes, effective and inclusive institutions, and gender drivers of conflict. The purpose is to inform and enhance the effectiveness of DFID/HMG’s work to prevent conflict and build lasting peace. Programme outputs will focus on learning and adaptation of programmes, as well as providing practical lessons and actionable recommendations, targeted at relevant policy processes both nationally and internationally.
Department for International Development
Saferworld
Saferworld
Conciliation Resources
International Alert
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
1000000
1000000
1000000
28321
Saferworld
Conciliation Resources
241565
Income for Peace Research Partnership funded by CHASE
88382
Y3 Q1 SW expenditure
Y3 Q1 SW expenditure
Y3 Q1 SW expenditure
100143
Y3 Q1 disbursement to CR
Y3 Q1 disbursement to CR
Y3 Q1 disbursement to CR
53039
Y3 Q1 disbursement to IA
Y3 Q1 disbursement to IA
Y3 Q1 disbursement to IA
87292
Y3 Q2 payment International Alert
Y3 Q2 payment International Alert
Y3 Q2 payment International Alert
57455
Y3 Q2 payment Conciliation Resources
Y3 Q2 payment Conciliation Resources
Y3 Q2 payment Conciliation Resources
235445
Y3 Q2 payment from DFID
Y3 Q2 payment from DFID
Y3 Q2 payment from DFID
90698
Y3 Q2 SW expenditure
Y3 Q2 SW expenditure
Y3 Q2 SW expenditure
64778
Department for International Development
Saferworld
184424
Department for International Development
Saferworld
238154
Department for International Development
Saferworld
3000000
Department for International Development
Saferworld
78737
Y2 Q1 SW expenditure
Y2 Q1 SW expenditure
90831
Y2 Q1 disbursement to IA
Y2 Q1 disbursement to IA
Y2 Q1 disbursement to IA
68586
Y2 Q1 disbursement to CR
Y2 Q1 disbursement to CR
Y2 Q1 disbursement to CR
2277
Saferworld
International Alert
315719
Y2 Q4 payment from DFID
67155
Y2 Q4 disbursement to IA
119757
Y2 Q4 SW expenditure
133306
Y2 Q4 disbursement to CR
33347
Saferworld
80407
Saferworld
34836
Disbursement to International Alert for the period July-Sept 2017
Saferworld
International Alert
88187
Saferworld
70014
Disbursement to Conciliation Resources for period July-Sept 2017
Saferworld
Conciliation Resources
193445
Department for International Development
Saferworld
430252
Department for International Development
Saferworld
131423
Saferworld
106057
Saferworld
Conciliation Resources
232370
Y2 Q2 payment from DFID
97171
Y2 Q2 SW expenditure
92546
Y2 Q2 disbursement to IA
42654
Y2 Q2 disbursement to CR
280983
Y2 Q3 payment from DFID
123527
Y2 Q3 SW expenditure
70191
Y2 Q3 disbursement to IA
87265
Y2 Q3 disbursement to CR
51260
Saferworld
International Alert
53998
Saferworld
Conciliation Resources
192772
Saferworld
International Alert
Output 3.0 Increase in internal understanding and/or comprehensive gender focus in research activities
3.1 Number of case studies incorporating a gender focus
1 = Guidance developed for comprehensive gender focus
A final draft is in place at the time of writing and the aim is to have the Gender Guidance signed off by end March disseminated by mid-April 18. The final draft guidance was presented and discussed at the recent cross-consortium learning event focused on practice-based research in early March 18.
1 case study
1 case study
Output 1.0 Knowledge products providing evidence, practical lessons and recommendations for effective policy and programming
1.1 Number of knowledge products (e.g. country case-studies, thematic synthesis reports, workshop materials, policy briefs, digital media), including those with specific gender findings
3 (including 2 with gender findings)
Including 2 with gender analysis
12 (including 6 with gender findings)
1.2 Number of participatory events (e.g. research design/methodology workshops, evidence-sharing/validation workshops, consultations with DFID, meetings with other donors/policy actors, presentations of findings, policy outreach meetings) throughout the programme
Saferworld: 1. Yemen/Nepal gender research design workshop (Kathmandu - July 17) 2. Yemen gender and conflict analysis training (Amman - Oct 17) 3. Yemen participatory methodology development workshop (Amman - Oct 17) 4. Kenya institutions research design workshop (Nairobi - Nov 17) 5. Consultation with DfID Kenya conflict and governance advisors (Nairobi - Nov 17) 6. Myanmar S&J research design workshop (Yangon - Nov 17) 7. Consultation with DfID Myanmar conflict advisor (Yangon - Nov 17) 8. Kenya methodology development and training (Nairobi - Feb 18) 9. Political Economy Analysis training workshop (London - Feb 18) 10. Consultations with EU and other policy actors in Myanmar (Yangon - March 18) 11. Myanmar methodology and research uptake workshop (Yangon - March 18)
1. Kenya: 16 July 2018 presented and discussed research findings at British High Commission in Nairobi, with East Africa Research Hub and other HMG officials (31 people: 13 women/ 18 men) 2. Kenya: 18 July 2018 presented and discussed research findings with County government authorities in Isiolo, northern Kenya 3. Kenya: 1st Aug 2018 presented and discussed research findings with DFID governance and conflict advisors at DFID-London 4. Myanmar: 9 May 2018 discussed emerging research findings with DFID, FCO, SU + CSSF officials at DFID-London (23 people: 10 women/ 13 men) 5. Myanmar: 26 Sept 2018 presented and discussed research findings with DFID, FCO, SU + CSSF officials at DFID-London (check men. women split) 6. Myanmar: 7 Dec 2018 presented and discussed research findings at MyJustice event in Yangon, Myanmar (83 people: approx. 41 women/ 42 men) 7. Yemen: 18 Oct 2018 presented and discussed research findings with DFID, FCO, SU + CSSF officials at DFID-London 8. Yemen: 22 March 2019 presented and discussed research findings with EU officials plus other Brussels-based donors and policy-makers 9. South Sudan: 30 Nov 2018 discussion of emerging research findings with DFID and FCO officials in Juba 10. South Sudan: 9 Jan 2019 discussion of emerging research findings with DFID and FCO officials at DFID-London 11. South Sudan: 27 March 2019 discussion of emerging research findings with DFID and FCO officials in Juba 12. South Sudan: 27 March 2019 discussion of emerging research findings with UNDP, UNMISS and NGOs, including World Vision and Pax representatives in Juba
1.3 Research adheres to agreed research principles
1 = Research principles agreed and disseminated to researchers
A final draft is in place at the time of writing and the aim is to have the Research Principles signed off by end March and disseminated by mid-April 18. The final draft research and ethics principles were presented and discussed at the recent cross-consortium learning event focused on practice-based research in early March 18.
1 piece of research from each organisation is peer assessed
SW - 2; CR - 2; IA - 2
1 piece of research from each organisation is peer assessed
Outcome 1.0 DFID, other HMG departments and development/peace partners have and apply new practical knowledge to strengthen the design, responsiveness and impact of policies and programmes for building peace and stability
1.1 Number of instances of feedback from target groups that the evidence is useful and relevant.
1. Written feedback from DFID-CHASE staff describing Saferworld's analysis of Security & Justice external perspectives to inform DFID's re-engagement on S&J as an "excellent and useful product" (March 2018) 2. Oral feedback from Yemeni women's rights CSO 'Wogood' that they are more knowledgeable and confident following training from Saferworld gender and conflict analysis and on use of participatory research approaches (March 2018).
Saferworld's contribution to Outcome 1, Milestone 2
1.2 Evidence of usage or uptake of research by sector/group, including application of a comprehensive gender focus to policymaking and programming
1. Yemen research - Shreya Mitra, Conflict Advisor, DFID Yemen: "I can confirm that findings from Saferworld’s PRP Yemen report fed into the section on Women and Peacebuilding in the JACS". (included a comprehensive gender focus) 2. Myanmar research - FCO Burma Desk Officer: positive informal feedback following a meeting on SW's security and justice research in Myanmar, which contributed to a decision to grant CSSF funding to expanded Saferworld programme on community security and security sector governance in Myanmar. 3. South Sudan research - Louise Hancock, Governance Adviser, FCO-DFID Joint Sudan Unit: "Thanks so much for all of this – we really appreciate it... the more evidence and analysis we have to inform our decision-making over coming months/years the better. Look forward to engaging with you further on this".
Output 2 Evidence communicated and disseminated Evidence tailored and communicated to targeted practitioners and policy actors
Number of targeted policy makers and practitioners sent outputs (e.g. Paper copies, Electronic copies, Audio/visual
2.1 Number of recipients of tailored outputs (e.g. Paper copies, Electronic copies, Audio/visual)
1 = All Research Uptake Plans complete.
Consortium: Overall research uptake plan and target mapping completed SW: Research uptake plans developed for the three Yr 1-2 focus countries.
All Research Uptake Plans complete
TBC once Research Uptake Plans complete.
GB-CHC-1043843-DFID-DAI_C002_DDP-G004
Saferworld
Building Effective Responses for Peaceful Elections in Kenya
More responsive, inclusive, and conflict sensitive engagement by county governments with their citizens (including women, youth and other excluded groups) in addressing service delivery problems around competition over shared resources such as grazing lands, livestock and food markets, water points, public schools, health facilities, minerals, and roads.
DFID
DAI
Saferworld
Saferworld
Catholic Justice and Peace Commission
Organization of African Instituted Churches
Pamoja for Transformation
Pastoralist Integrated Support Programme
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
471799
228201
92502
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from July to September 2016
Saferworld
133569
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from January to March 2017
Saferworld
100733
Expenditures and Disbursements to local partners from October to December 2016
Saferworld
101774
DAI
Saferworld
79643
Saferworld
129089
Saferworld
113417
Expenditure and Disbursements to local partners from April to June 2017
Saferworld
580678
DAI
Saferworld
119322
Department for International Development
Saferworld
119322
Department for International Development
Saferworld
78295
DAI
Saferworld
279598
DAI
Saferworld
114503
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_U006
Saferworld
Promoting the Role of Youth in Peaceful Elections in Kenya
This project aims to transform those traditionally associated with election violence in Kenya – the youth – into champions for a peaceful electoral process. The project will achieve this through an integrated approach to mitigating violence triggers and reconciling conflicting groups; linking marginalised youth, including those with disabilities, to existing conflict prevention and response structures; and creating channels for youth-led advocacy to county and national-level political actors.
US Department of State
Saferworld
Saferworld
Life and Peace Institute (LPI)
Handicap International UK
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
720592
267062
56098
Relates to final payment
US Department of State
Saferworld
122365
Us Department of State
Saferworld
133909
Relates to Q4 (Jan - Mar 2018)
Saferworld
137185
Relates to Q1 (April -June 2017)
Saferworld
184881
Relates to Q2 (July to Sept 2017)
Saferworld
167587
Relates to Q5 (April to June 2018)
Saferworld
171141
Relates to Q6 (July -Sept 2018)
Saferworld
36437
Relates to Q7 (Oct 2018)
Saferworld
987654
US Department of State
Saferworld
156516
Relates to Q3 (Oct - Dec 2017)
Saferworld
157095
US Department of State
Saferworld
20337
Saferworld
Life and Peace Institute (LPI)
8000
Saferworld
Life and Peace Institute (LPI)
150871
US Department of State
Saferworld
284238
US Department of State
Saferworld
216987
Us Department of State
Saferworld
Output 1.1 Key individuals, institutions and vulnerable groups (including young people with disabilities) mapped, Youth Leaders and Youth Groups indentified
a) Number of key actors (individuals,institutions and Youth Groups) identified and committed to engage in the project activities
Derived from the Gender, conflict and disability sensitivity analysis which was done from 24th to 31st March 2017 in Kisii, Homa Bay and Nairobi counties
54 representatives (3 sampled per group) of the key actors to participate in the actors mapping in the four target counties - by Y1Q2
Achieved Y1Q1. 89 ( 49M:40F) representing National and county government, electoral body, CSOs, youth groups, community leaders, business community, media, security agencies, people living with disability, political parties
b) Representation of women and people with disabilities either in membership, or thematic focus of Youth Groups
At least 30% of the membership of selected Youth Groups is women and people with disabilities - by Y1Q2
Achieved in Y1Q1 - 45% of key actors were female.
c) Number of the key actors in different activities that promote non violent political process among the target communities
Due to key actors' lack of knowledge of their roles in driving conflict and division, as well as lack of political will to counter it, there is little effort witnessed to resolve previous electoral violence that have occurred during electoral activities
Achieved in Y1Q1 - 18 youths groups and 54 youth leaders identified. 36 representatives and 54 youth leaders trained and developed the action plans for implementing activities with target peace actors
A peaceful, free and inclusive 2017 electoral process in Kenya with a leading role for youth.
Percentage of the reported incidents of tensions and violence associated youths participating in the electoral processes in Kenya
The frequency of violent incidents is on the rise, as witnessed during past electoral activities such as vote registration and political meetings/gatherings in parts of the country. There is likelihood of more widespread incidents as the election date approaches.
Supported Youth Groups and linked peace structures, including Sub-County Peace Committees and CSOs engaged under this project, contribute to directly mitigating 40% of identified triggers of violence in the pre-election period, by Y1Q2, and 40% in the post-election period, by Y2Q2
Output 3.2. National and international stakeholders participate in learning, reflection and exchange around inclusive, non-violent electoral processes in polarized and divided contexts
3.2.1 Number of USG supported events, trainings, or activities designed to build support for peace or reconciliation among key actors to the conflict
a) Role and seniority of participation at Learning and Reflection Roundtable
20 (representing national electoral body, regional and international actors)
3.2.2 Number of stakeholders who have expressed commitment by international actors to interrogate learning from this project into their future activities in Kenya
5 organisations from the targeted 20 organisations/institutions
Outcome 2.0: Youth in the target counties are active participants in early warning and response structures, ensuring they react to youth-specific needs and concerns.
a) Extent and depth of information-sharing between support Youth Groups and early warning and early response structures
Currently, the existing early warning and response do not adequately engage young men and women, or persons with disabilities, in monitoring and planning within the county-level early warning and response system. Though youths are actors in the conflicts, the institutional frameworks do not consider them to be part of the response mechanisms
50% of supported Youth Groups are sharing information with relevant county early warning and early response structures, by Y1Q4, 80% by Y2Q2
b) Number of collaborative violence response initiatives undertaken jointly by supported Youth Groups and formal early warning and early response bodies (Peace Committees, CEWERU)
At least one collaborative initiative between supported Youth Groups and relevant county early warning and response structures takes place in each county, by Y1Q4, 2 y Y2Q2.
Output 1.3 Youth Group-led election-related peacebuilding activities with community-level stakeholders in the target counties
1.3.1 a) Number of people participating in USG-supported events, trainings, or activities designed to build mass support for peace and reconciliation.
Y1 Q4 - 2,015 (1,319 males and 696 females, including 46 males and 31 females with disabilities) Y2 Q1- 26,917 (14,084 males and 12,530 females out of which 166 males and 137 females being persons with disabilities)
1.3.1 b) Percentage of people participating in USG-supported events/trainings/activities that are female/PWD
At least 30% must be female/people with disablity
Y1, Q4 -38% Y2, Q1 -48
1.3.2 Number of the youth led processes/initiatives for peace messages dissemination and opportunities for engaging wide youths population in the target counties
Y1 Q4 - 75 reconciliation dialogues held Y2 Y2 Q1-168 drama & performances done; 26 town hall meetings; 6 university inter-ethnic dialogues Y2 Q2 - 12 inter-ethnic dialogues held; 11 drama & performances held
Output 3.1 Positive interaction and engagement developed through youth-led dialogue and advocacy between young people and key policy actors and influencers (including political leaders, government officials and electoral bodies)
3.1.1 a) Number of town hall meetings designed to build support for peace or reconciliation among key actors to the conflict
(targeting 50 youths participants per town hall meeting & 60 students per event)
Y1 Q4 - 37 town hall meetings held Y2 Q2 -10 town hall meetings held
3.1.1 b) Number of student dialogue events designed to build support for peace or reconciliation among key actors to the conflict
(targeting 50 youths participants per town hall meeting & 60 students per event)
Q1 Y1 - 8 inter-ethnic dialogue sessions were held YQ Q2 - 6 inter-ethnic dialogue sessions were held
3.1.2 Number of the youth led town hall meetings with key policy makers, social and political leaders engaged on issues affecting youths during the town hall meetings in the target counties
72 (14 towns hall meetings to be done in each target county and 30 university events)
3.1.3 Commitment of the both youths, political actors and other key stakeholders to increase the support of youths participation in political, socio and economic processes in the target counties
Political and private sectors actors are less able and willing to mobilize youth for politically-motivated violence, and youth themselves are less vulnerable to manipulation due to engagement of the youths in productive activities including peacebuilding activities. 1 = achieved.
By Dec 17: For students leaders who were trained under this project they agreed to support their own members in student council election in which 6 of them were elected.
Output 1.2 Youth, students, journalists and editors participate in training and workshops around peacebuilding and conflict sensitivity which enable them to contribute to electoral violence prevention and response in the target locations
1.2.1 a) Number of training and planning workshops for selected Youth Leaders and Youth Groups held
Three training workshops, one per Target County, by Y1Q2, for 90 selected youth leaders & youth groups
Achieved Y1Q1. 3 youth training for youth groups and leaders carried it. A total of 90 youth leaders and youth group representatives from the 18 theatre groups participated
1.2.1 b) Number of training and planning workshops for Student Leaders held
1 training and planning workshop for 30 Student Leaders held by Y1Q2
Achieved Y1Q1. 30 university student leaders were successfully identified from three public universities in Nairobi
1.2.1 c) Number of conflict sensitive journalism trainings held
1.2.2 a) Number of the youths with knowledge on conflict management/peacebuilding and received action plans on how to engage in preventing and responding to conflict in the target counties.
113 youth (58M:55F). 90(50M:40F) participants from youth trainings and 23(8M:15F) from University students training
1.2.2 b) Percentage of youths with knowledge on conflict management/peacebuilding who were female/PWD
At least 40% of participants at training workshops are women or people with disabilities.
Achieved Y1Q1. 113 participants (58M:55F)
1.2.3 a) Number of journalists that have been trained on conflict sensitive journalism and received mentorship
By Dec 17 - 28 Journalist were trained
1.2.3 a) Percentage of journalists trained on conflict sensitivity that were female/PWD
Be Dec 17 - 28 Journalists trained (15 male and 13 female).
Outcome 3.0: Youth in the target counties have greater voice in advancing peaceful elections, and are proactively advocating to county-level political actors
a) Number of instances of proactive advocacy by supported Youth Groups, at county level
Kenyan youth are at risk of engaging in criminal and violent activities due to limited space or means to engage national and county governments, political, religious and social organisations/institutions. They have enlisted in criminal gangs, religiously motivated violent groups while others being easily mobilised to participate in violence
Each supported youth group, in the three selected sub-counties in Bungoma, Migori and Nairobi, proactively engages county authorities at least once by Y1Q4, twice by Y2Q2
b) Commitment by key political actors to increase engagement with youth in local decision-making
65% of engaged political actors commit verbally to increase their engagement with youth in local decision-making, by Y2Q2
Outcome 1.0: Key actors, across traditional social and political divides, recognize their role and others’ role in election violence, and help to prevent and reduce election violence in areas identified as hotspots.
a) Number of joint statements and initiatives by community members, Youth Groups and government actors that promote non violent political processes
There is little effort witnessed to resolve tensions that have led to electoral violence in the past. In fact, politicians are capitalizing on these tensions to win support from specific ethnic groups. Levels of violence during previous elections were significant, with cross-ethnic collaboration low.
5 joint statements and 3 initiatives, by Y1Q2, 10 joint statements and 10 initiatives by Y2Q2
b) Diversity of ethnic representation in statements and initiatives
Each joint statement is signed by youth representatives of all major ethnic groups in the respective county; similarly for joint initiatives
c) Level of participation of women and people with disabilities
90% of initiatives undertaken through this project include the participation of women, 40% those with disabilities
Output 2.1 Peace and security structures at the sub-county level are brought together to coordinate their actions, share information, and broaden their representation
2.1.1 Number of USG supported events, trainings, or activities designed to build support for peace or reconciliation among key actors to the conflict
90 events (each county has 30 members of county peace and security committee drawn from all Sub counties)
Y1 Q3- 4 forums held Y2 Q1 -6 forums held Y2 Q1 - 6 forums held Y2 Q2 - 6 forums held
2.1.2 Number of forums held that brought together key actors who are members of the Sub County Peace and Security structures to conduct early warning and response activities in the target counties
90 meetings carried out across 3 target counties.
By Dec 17: 10 meetings held (3 in Kisii county, 2 in Hoa Bay County and 5 held in Nairobi County)
2.1.3 Extent of youth involvement in coordinating and developing early warning and responses jointly with other key actors to mitigate tensions and conflicts before, during and after general elections
Early warning structures have forged more effective and inclusive links from community to national level that include youth in order to effectively respond to election violence risks. 1 = achieved
By Dec 17: A peace committee has been formed in Kisii county. The peace committee has incorporated youths especially members of the boda boda groups and a community Peace and Protection team has also been formed
Output 2.2. Consultations among civil society organizations to discuss and develop mechanisms to respond to electoral violence issues at county and national level
2.2.1 Number of USG supported events, trainings, or activities designed to build support for peace or reconciliation among key actors to the conflict
17 monthly CSOs meetings . This number may increase depending funding of peace activities from other donors
9 Civil Society Coordination meetings (otherwise NMF) were held around the support of the dialogue processes at the national level
2.2.2 Number of consultative forums held to strategize and to coordinate peace efforts for CSOs in the target counties around 2017 general elections
By Dec 17: 11 COS coordination meetings were held in Nairobi
GB-CHC-1043843-Danida_H010
Saferworld
Participatory Governance & Peace Programming in Somalia
This project is a continuation of a long-standing body of work aiming to support civil society and non-state actors engage in policy dialogue with local authorities and the international community on priority peacebuilding, statebuilding and democratisation issues via three Non State Actor platforms.
Danida
Saferworld
Saferworld
Somaliland Non State Actors Forum (SONSAF)
Somali South Central Non-State Actors (SOSCENSA)
Puntland Non-State Actors' Association (PUNSAA)
Saferworld
Sam Godolphin
Funding Officer
+44 (0) 207 324 4646
sgodolphin@saferworld.org.uk
The Grayston Centre, 28 Charles Square, London N1 6HT
Somalia
1133760
1133760
1133760
47240
72079
Saferworld
869426
Saferworld
328652
Saferworld
141917
Danida
Saferworld
3448520
Danida
Saferworld
230934
Danida
Saferworld
1033713
Danida
Saferworld
170398
Danida
Saferworld
46781
Danida
Saferworld
278365
Saferworld
203204
Saferworld
738061
Danida
Saferworld
270692
Saferworld
381803
Saferworld
218500
Saferworld
150706
Saferworld
405362
Danida
Saferworld
233922
Danida
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-UNOPS_K004
Saferworld
Improving Community Small Arms Light Weapons and Ammunition Control
The primary objective of this project is to ‘enhance community-based solutions to threats posed by SALW to improve safety and security in selected locations in South Sudan’.
UNOPS
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
248065
51680
30880
Saferworld
39715
Saferworld
59224
Saferworld
41184
UNOPS
Saferworld
79076
UNOPS
Saferworld
80489
UNOPS
Saferworld
49469
UNOPS
Saferworld
83789
Saferworld
299745
UNOPS
Saferworld
25000
UNOPS
Saferworld
61610
Saferworld
Outcome 1: Increase community, civil society, local, and national authorities’ knowledge of threats to civilians caused by gun-related violence, accidents, and localised disputes.
a) Number and type of actions and decisions made by Communities, Civil societies, local or national authorities and other stakeholders to inform and change their practices, intervention plans and strategies to address SALW issues.
At the end of the project eight (8) decisions were made and acted on by the communities, CSOs and local authorities to address issues of SALW in the three project locations.
Output 1.1: Up to four context analyses are completed, and disseminated to stakeholders, and used to inform CAPs
a) Number of Community Security Assessment (CSA) conducted and disseminated.
During the project period, a total of three (3) Community Security Assessments (CSA) completed in Rumbek Centre, Rumbek East and Kuajok, compared to the plan 3 (100%). The CSA findings disseminated immediatelly after data analysed and report produced to give feedback on local conflict dynamics for the Communities, CSOs, local authorities and other relevant stakeholders in each of the project locations.
b) Number of Community Action Groups (CAGs) that restructured to identify, prioritize and solve SALW specific issues through community-owned solutions.
During the project period, a total of eight (8) Community Action Groups (3 in Rumbek Central, 2 in Rumbek East and 3 in Kuajok) restructured to focus and address threat posed by SALW through the existing community mechanisms, compared to the plan 8 (100%).
Output 3.1: Tested methodologies for a community-driven approach to enhance SALW control are developed and disseminated to all relevant stakeholders
a) Number and type of community-driven tested methodologies and best practice produced and disseminated.
During the project period, a best practice document with methodology developed, published and disseminated to different stakeholder in all project locations including Juba.
b) Number and type of relevant stakeholders reached by state and national-levels meeting to disseminate the SALW tested methodologies and best practice guide.
During the project period, SALW best practice document dissemination meetings have been organized in Rumbek central, Rumbek East and Kuajok in May. The meetings were attended by participants from various stakeholders including CAGs, government, civil society organisations, Bureau of Community Security and Small Arms Control (BCSSAC), NGOs, United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), women and youth groups among others. Accordingly a total of 120 participants (96 men and 33 Women) attended the dissemination meeting from the three locations, compared to 90 (133%).
Output 2.2: Up to three CAPs are successfully implemented through six small grants to support community-based solutions to identified SALW priorities.
a) Number of review meetings conducted to adapt/revise and measure progress of Community Actions Plans (CAPs).
During the project period, eight (8) review meetings conducted to review and adapt CAPs based on the emerging issues and context, compared with the plan (89%). The target was not reached because due to the state of emergency in the project locations, the meeting was not conducted.
b) Number of small grants disbursed to the Community Action Groups (CAGs) to implement their action plans.
During the project period, a total of six (6) small grants disbursed to CAGs (2 per each of the three locations) in two phases.
c) Number and type of Community Actions Plans (CAPs) successfully completed by Community Action Groups (CAGs).
During the project period, a total of three (3) CAPs (one per each of the project locations) completed by the respective CAGs. The type of CAPs were different from location to location based on their context. Due to the new development and context change some of the original CAPs revised and amended to fit into the existing context and CAGs managed to complete their CAPs in the given table.
Outcome 3: Establish, together with local communities and authorities, conflict- and gender-sensitive, cost-effective, and community-owned solutions that reduce threats posed by SALW.
a) Number and type of relevant stakeholders who take part and show interest to integrate tested SALW methodologies and best practices into their policies, interventions, plans and strategies.
During the project period, four government stakeholders showed interest to use Saferworld best practice document, compared to the plan 6 (67%). These are: 1. Member of Parliaments (MPs) have pledge to use the SALW best practice guide document in drafting state-level community owned firearms control bill in Kuajok. 2. Director General (DG) of the state ministry of local government and law enforcement pledged that the ministry will use Saferworld best practice guide and lesson learned as a basis for future initiative of arms control programme in Kuajok. 3. Civil Society Organization Network (CiSON) held discussion on SALW project lesson learned and best practices. 4. County Executive Director (CED) who was the chief guest during the dissemination meeting appreciated Saferworld and CEPO for giving the tool which they have been lacking. He pledged to work with the organized forces to change their way of handling weapons. The state of emergency in the project locations and disarmament process affected the achievement of the target.
b) Number and type of community owned mechanisms/groups established together with communities, CSOs and local authorities to reduce threats posed by SALW.
During the project period, a total of nineteen (19) different community owned mechanisms/groups established together with communities, CSOs and local authorities to reduce threats posed by proliferation of SALW in Rumbek central and Kuajok according to their CAPs
Outcome 2: Improve safer behaviour in handling SALW among households and communities (including women, youth, and children) in selected counties
a) Perception of the Community Action Groups (CAGs) on the overall situation of the threat and issues posed by Small Arms and Light Weapons in their Community.
6 (75% if the CAGS)
All the eight CAGs participated in the mini perception survey perceived that the overall situation of the threat and issues posed by SALWs in their communities relatively reduced compared to the previous year which was 6.
b) Number and type of SALW related issues and threats addressed through the established community representatives mechanism.
At the end of the project a total of nine (9) SALW related issues and problems addressed compared to the target of 10 because the CAGs developed community action plans later than expected. Issues addressed are: 1. School club student identified unexploded ordinance (UXO) while school children were playing with it. CAG member approached UNMISS and the UXO was detonated safely in Kuajok; 2. Deployment of security forces in Nyottik-angui improved security in the area. 3. Anti-cattle raiding committees in Nyang-koot work hand in hand with the group in Cuei-cok to track the cattle rustlers who had raided cattle in Nyang-koot; 4. The anti-cattle rustling and road safety monitoring committees helped increase road security in collaboration with the security providers. 5. Communities along Apuk and Aguok border started farming and cultivation after the peace dialogue; 6. Good collaboration between Chief, Gelwang and the police helped increased reported cases to the police and to take action on the bandits and cattle thieves, 7) SPLA commander instituted road patrolling unit along Aduel-akot and Aduel-Rumbek roads, 8) Women in Malith, Malual-akan and Achol-refused arms storage in their houses, 9) CAGs in RE and RC visit cattle camps to meet and raise awareness on threats posed by SALW by their own initiatives.
Output 2.1: Up to three conflict- and gender-sensitive CAPs that address SALW issues are jointly developed and regularly updated by CAGs
a) Number of Community Action Groups (CAGs) members trained on SALW control, action plan development and implementation.
During the project period, a total of 310 CAG members (190 men and 120 women) trained across the three project locations, compared to the plan 360 (86%). The target was not reached because due to the state of emergency the number of participates was limited to small groups as some failed to attend the trainings.
b) Number of joint action planning meetings conducted to identify and prioritise SALW issues.
During the project period, three (3) joint action planning meetings (one per each location) conducted and completed the development of community action plans (CAPs) for implementation.
c) Number and type of Community Actions Plans (CAPs) developed in conflict and gender sensitive manner.
During the project period, three (3) CAPs (one per each of the three project locations) developed by CAGs, implementation started in Oct-2017 and completed its implementation at the end of May-2018.
d) Number of trainings delivered to communities, CSOs, armed youth, chiefs and local authorities on arms control as the part of capacity building to increase stakeholders’ involvement in addressing the issue related to SALW at the local-level.
During the project period, a total of eight (8) training delivered based on the CAPs priority, compared to the plan 8 (100%). Training delivered to 158 participants (113 men and women) from the communities, armed youth, chiefs and local authorities in Rumbek East and central. In Rumbek East alone 120 participants (86 males and 34 females) trained on promoting safer practices and the roles of different stakeholders in controlling the proliferation of SALW while other 38 participants (27 males and 11 females) trained on fire Arms Act 2016, participatory action planning, advocacy and Lobbying in Rumbek Central.
GB-CHC-1043843-SDCBangladesh_H011
Saferworld
Action research on empowering communities through business for peace (B4P)
The project aims to build resilience against violence (political, electoral and social) by harnessing the potential of local business actors to act as advocates for the peaceful resolution of conflict in two working areas, leading to inclusive and participatory local governance reform and economic development.
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
69474
40526
5745
3064
Saferworld
12578
Saferworld
22807
Saferworld
18307
Saferworld
110000
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
31782
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
42089
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
14095
Saferworld
17693
Saferworld
19147
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_U005
Saferworld
Promoting a sustainable and locally-led community policing program in the Kyrgyz Republic
This project aims to build sustainable support and cooperation between citizens and security providers, so that the community policing approach is being successfully implemented by CPPTs, based on multi-year, strategic LCPC plans, and is institutionalized in local and national government agendas.
US Department of State
Saferworld
Saferworld
Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI)
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Kyrgyzstan
699982.5
699982
97030
Saferworld
101155
Saferworld
113904
Saferworld
147234
US Department of State
Saferworld
94363
US Department of State
Saferworld
399993
US Department of State
Saferworld
175715
US Department of State
Saferworld
189773
Saferworld
334096
Saferworld
999971.5
US Department of State
Saferworld
172962
US Department of State
Saferworld
211011
US Department of State
Saferworld
288920
US Department of State
Saferworld
368416
Saferworld
75696.78
Saferworld
118544.1
Saferworld
86823.78
Us Department of State
Saferworld
163603.1
Saferworld
132514.05
Saferworld
109540.45
Saferworld
309759.50
US Department of State
Saferworld
134249.44
US Department of State
Saferworld
127732.10
US Department of State
Saferworld
151243.68
US Department of State
Saferworld
147171.33
US Department of State
Saferworld
142063.29
US Department of State
Saferworld
500549
US Department of State
Saferworld
545000
US Department of State
Saferworld
168353
Saferworld
148099.09
Saferworld
92264
US Department of State
Saferworld
131684
Saferworld
159501
US Department of State
Saferworld
136893
Saferworld
58822
Saferworld
Objective 2: Developing police-public problem-solving partnerships in selected communities
new CPPTs established
5 new CPPTs established
community policing/security cycle trainings for new CPPTs
5 community policing/security cycle training for new CPPTs held
exchange of experience workshops for existing and new CPPTs
3 exchange of experience workshops for existing and new CPPTs held
trainings on peacebuilding and community security responses to the drivers of violent extremism and conflict and gender sensitivity delivered
youth- and women-focused outreach campaigns implemented
sub-grants provided to women and youth teams who coordinate outreach campaigns
Objective 3: Creating a strategy that ensures sustainability of LCPCs beyond the project’s duration
trainings for LCPC/CPPT members and other community initiative group (CIG)1 members from 3 provinces delivered on: (1) peacebuilding and community security responses to the drivers of violent extremism; and (2) conflict and gender sensitivity
exchange of experience workshops for existing and new CPPTS/LCPCs
accountability meetings of police with their communities
To be reported on in the next reporting period
community policing/security outreach events (e.g., thematic meetings, presentations, exhibitions) to provide information to and motivate community members to cooperate with police for community security
Objective 1: Generating an understanding of and support for community-based policing among key decision-makers/leaders within the Kyrgyz police force and government officials
coordination meetings at national-level held
National coordination meetings held
coordination meetings at province-level held, 2 in each of Osh, Batken and Jalal-Abad provinces
6 coordination meetings at province level
By quarter ending 31/03/2020
joint workshops with MIA and local governments coordinated
new LCPCs established and renovated
5 LCPCs established and renovated
LCPCs provided with funds for implementation of crime prevention plans
LCPCs’ multi-year plans developed and supported
10 LCPC multi-year plans developed
At least 3 workshops on peacebuilding and community security responses to the drivers of radicalization and violent extremism delivered, 1 in each province
2 workshops on peacebuilding and community policing/security held
workshops on gender sensitivity delivered, 1 in each province
2 workshops on conflict and gender sensitivity held
GB-CHC-1043843-OSI_N023
Saferworld
Peace & Rights-Based Alternatives to Counter-Terror, Stabilisation and Statebuilding
This project is looking to continue and build upon Saferworld's existing work on the theme of constructive alternatives to the predominant counter-terror narrative. It will do this through the use of policy research, dialogue, advocacy and communications that connect evidence, analysis and voices from affected contexts with the policy conversation in the US, UK, EU and UN.
The long-term objective of this programme is that the US, and its key partners such as the UK and the EU, adopt more sustainable, less violent, more rights-focused responses to terrorism and instability that constructively address the root causes of violent conflict for the long term.
Open Society Institute Budapest Foundation (OSI)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Developing countries, unspecified
164846
164845
82423
Open Society Institute Budapest Foundation (OSI)
Saferworld
82570
Open Society Institute Budapest Foundation (OSI)
Saferworld
82500
Saferworld
133089
Saferworld
114114
Saferworld
329691
Open Society Institute Budapest Foundation (OSI)
Saferworld
82360
Open Society Institute Budapest Foundation (OSI)
Saferworld
82350
Open Society Institute Budapest Foundation (OSI)
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-ECKyrgyzstan_D028
Saferworld
Promoting dialogue and collaboration among youth in Kyrgyzstan
The overall objective of this project is to facilitate greater collaboration, civic activism and support youth to lead collaborative initiatives to raise awareness of, address and respond to youth concerns including the use of extremist rhetoric in Kyrgyzstan. The specific objective of this project is to strengthen youth capacity in the south of Kyrgyzstan to promote open and free public discourse on religion and democracy and to become less susceptible to rhetoric that fuel conflict.
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
Foundation for Tolerance International (FTI)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
357882
357882
357882
308313
Saferworld
91957
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
332940
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
1073648
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
275275
European Commission - EuropeAid
Saferworld
230491
Saferworld
Output 3.2 Youth Religion and Democracy Delegates trained and develop advocacy plans
a) Number of workshops and participants
2 two-day trainings on advocacy to be carried out
18 YRDD to participate in advocacy training
b) Number of advocacy plans developed
1 national advocacy strategy/plan to be developed and revised.
3 oblast level advocacy strategies/plans to be developed and revised.
Output 1.1 Pilot communities and target groups are selected
a) Number of communities selected based on selection criteria
6 target districts or towns in the southern provinces of Kyrgyzstan
6 districts or towns identified (Aravan, Karasuu, Leilek, Kadamjai, Suzak, Bazar-Korgon
b) Number of selected young people (disaggregated by gender, ethnicity, age, religion and occupation)
Between February 2017 - Jan 2018
c) Number of selected formal and informal female leaders from the selected communities to participate at the project activities
Between February 2017 - Jan 2018
Outcome 3.0: Young women and men, including formal and informal female leaders, engage and advocate for more tailored and appropriate policies towards youth collaboration, with a focus on decreasing the use of extremist rhetoric across the country
a) Percentage of YRDD and female leaders that report having increased skills and knowledge to raise awareness and advocate with authorities and security providers
80% of the YRDD will report having increased skills to raise awareness and advocate with authorities and security providers
b) By participating in oblast level and nation level workshops, YRDD delegates will produce clear advocacy messages detailing specific policy changes required, with a focus on extremist rhetoric.
In Y2 and in Y3 YRDD will participate in at least 3 oblast level workshops, where they will deliver their messages through the developed advocacy plans.
In Y2 and in Y3 YRDD will participate in at least 1 national level workshop, where they will deliver their messages through the developed advocacy plans.
Outcome 2.0: Greater collaboration with communities, local authorities and security providers is achieved through youth-led local initiatives, which also result in greater addressing of concerns affecting young women and men, in relation to extremist rhetoric.
a) 1. Number of local initiatives produced and implemented (including through seed grants) which respond to concerns raised through community consultations (including to address extremism).
By Y3: At least 18 local initiatives implemented by youth groups.
20 between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
a) 2. Percentage of action plans implemented by youth groups that will address extremist rhetoric
At least 30% of the action plans implemented by youth groups will address extremist rhetoric.
65% between Feb 2017 and Jan 2019
b) 1. Percentage of youth action group members that represent other ethnic minority groups
At least 20% of members of the youth action groups will be represented by other ethnic groups.
In year 1, four of the 10 youth groups were led by young people from an ethnic minority background
b) 2. Percentage of youth action group members that are female
At least 30% of youth action groups members will be females
All 10 youth group cohorts had a minimum of 30% female participants
b) 3. Number of initiatives implemented that have the support of at least 1 local authority (including security providers)
All 18 initiatives will be implemented with support of at least one local authority (including security providers)
Not yet implementing. Due to begin Y2
Output 2.2 Local initiatives are designed and implemented
a) 1. Number of youth-led action plans (including seed grants) implemented
At least 18 local initiatives designed by youth groups
20 between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
a) 2. Percentage of youth led action plans that will address extremist rhetoric
At least 30% of youth led action plans will address extremist rhetoric
65% between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
Output 3.4 Young Religion and Democracy Delegates have conducted advocacy meetings
a) Number of advocacy meetings between YRDD and decision-makers (e.g. local authorities, police)
At least 18 advocacy meetings are to be conducted by year 3.
Output 2.1 Youth groups established and trained on conflict analysis
a) Number of youth participants that attended workshops
182 between Feb 2017 and Jan 2019
b) Number of workshops organized on conflict analysis; and systems maps developed
By Y3 9 workshops are organized.
6 between Feb 2017 and Jan 2019
By Y3, 9 conflict analyses/ system maps developed
6 between Feb 2017 and Jan 2019
Output 1.4 Journalists/PR specialist/bloggers and government representatives are trained on conflict sensitive reporting
a) Number of participants from mass media and government agencies (Ministry of Interior and Committee on Youth issues under the Ministry of Migration and Labour) who participate in trainings
17 journalists
Between February 2017 - Jan 2018
2 state representatives
Between February 2017 - Jan 2018
b) Number of trainings organized for the representatives of mass media and government agencies
1 joint training for media and government representatives
1 training (for 18 participants) was organised between February 2017 - Jan 2018
Output 3.1 Research conducted about the main concerns and issues affecting young women and men, including that could potentially act as drivers towards more extreme ideologies and behaviour
Number of reports/research produced and disseminated
By Y2: 1 in-depth research will be produced
To be produce in Y3
Output 3.3 National conference is organized
a) Number of national conferences and participants
1 national conference to be organized
At least 100 participants to attend the national conference
Output 3.5 Advocacy outputs are produced and broadcast
a) Number of trainings organized for YRDD on using social media for positive messaging on peaceful co-existence.
By Y3: one training conducted
18 YRDD to have participated in social media for positive messaging training
b) Number of advocacy outputs produced and disseminated on social media
18 social media products produced
1 Facebook page created
1 Facebook page created between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
Output 3.6 Young Religion and Democracy Delegates build links with the Ministry of Labor, Migration and Youth to tackle issues on extremist rhetoric among youth
a) MoU signed between YRDD and relevant Ministries (facilitated by Saferworld and partners) MoU signed between FTI and the State Agency for Youth Affairs, Physical Culture and Sports of the Kyrgyz Republic
1 MoU to be signed.
b) Number of oblast level strategies/plans developed involving youth to address the issues around extremist rhetoric
By the end of the project at least one oblast level strategy with participation of youth is developed
Output 1.2 Young people trained on issues related to democracy, religion, and extremism
a) Number of young people trained during the youth camps
Between February 2017 - Jan 2019.
b) Number of training sessions
Between February 2017 - Jan 2019
Specific Project Objective: To strengthen youth capacity in the south of Kyrgyzstan to promote open and free public discourse on religion and democracy and to become less susceptible to extremist rhetoric that fuel conflict.
a) Percentage of youth participants (youth groups, YRDDs, female leaders) who feel able to discuss sensitive conflict and security-related issues (e.g. religion, extremism) within their communities, with other communities and with authorities.
By Y3: 30% of youth participants of diverse backgrounds (by ethnicity, religion, and gender) from all three target oblasts will be able to discuss sensitive issues with their communities and with local authorities
b) Percentage of programme stakeholders (youth groups, YRDDs, female leaders, LCPCs) who report trust and cooperation within the community
By Y3: 50% of project stakeholders (by age, gender, ethnicity, and religion) from three southern oblasts of Kyrgyzstan demonstrate trust and cooperation within their communities
c) Percentage of programme stakeholders (youth groups, YRDDs, female leaders, LCPCs, community members) that report initiatives effectively addressed their target issue
By Y3: 80% of project participants and stakeholders report the initiatives effectively addressed local security and safety concerns
Overall Objective: To facilitate greater collaboration, civic activism and support youth to lead collaborative initiatives to raise awareness of, address and respond to youth concerns and the use of extremist rhetoric in Kyrgyzstan.
Examples of young people participating constructively in local, national and regional public discourse and democratic processes in Kyrgyzstan.
According to the Saferworld research on youth one of the major complaints of youth in Central Asia – regardless of their ethnic background – is that they feel abandoned, unprotected and uncared for by their state authorities. Youth most common experience of interacting with state officials is the experience of being controlled, repressed and sometimes abused. This is extremely limiting to the potential for youth to participate in decision-making and actively contribute to maintaining peace and stability in their communities.
By the end of Y 3: the project will contribute to developing ethnically diverse youth into grass-roots activists and leaders, and supporting constructive cooperation between them, their communities, local authorities and security providers. The practical focus of cooperation is on raising awareness of, addressing and responding to key issues affecting young women and men, as well as promoting active participation of youth, women, ethnic and religious groups in local, national and regional processes to build and sustain peace.
During the 1st year 160 young peacebuilders and 60 women leaders across from 3 southern provinces (Batken,Jalal-Abad,Osh) of Kyrgyzstan increased skills and knowledge in tolerance, religion and democracy. This enabled them to analyse the security issues and situation in their communities. Further they designed and implemented 10 initiatives, which were implemented in partnership with local governments, law enforcement agencies, Local Crime Prevention Centres, educational institutions and broader civil society actors.
Output 1.3 Formal and informal female leaders trained on issues related to religion, effects of extremist rhetoric and radicalization.
a) Number of formal and informal female leaders who participate in the trainings
Between February 2017 - Jan 2019
b) Number of trainings organized for formal and informal female leaders
6 local and 1 national training organised between February 2017 - Jan 2019
Output 1.5 Youth delegates are trained and practice conflict sensitive reporting
a) Number of Youth Religion and Democracy Delegates trained on conflict sensitive reporting
4 Youth delegate fellows and 4 project participants were trained on conflict sensitive reporting between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
b) Number of mentors identified
3 journalist mentors were selected between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
c) Number of media materials produced by youth
9 media products
Between Feb 2017 - January 2019
Output 2.3 Thematic outreach activities are conducted
a) Number of workshops and participants
3 two-day workshops to be carried out
2 between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
At least 90 participants should attend the two-day workshops
80 between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
b) Number of thematic outreach activities and/or events
3 thematic outreach activities to be carried out
Y2: 3 local outreach activities are in progress
3 nation-wide events to be carried out
Year 2: 1 national outreach campaign is in progress
Output 1.6 Study visit for YRDD fellows is organized
a) Number of study visits organised
To be achieved by end of Y3
b) Number of participants on study/exchange visit (disaggregated by type of participant)
18 YRDD
To be achieved by end of Y3
1 representative of the Ministry of Youth
To be achieved by end of Y3
Output 2.4 Selected Young Religion and Democracy Delegates completed six-month fellowship
a) Number of Young Religion and Democracy Delegates that complete fellowship
14 between Feb 2017 - Jan 2019
Outcome 1.0: Young women and men, including formal and informal female leaders, demonstrate increased understanding of the benefits of dialogue, and ways in which they can use these approaches to address issues affecting them, the communities they live in and the broader society
a) Number and percentage of youth participants that report having increased skills and knowledge as a result of the training and mentoring provided through the project.
Each year 80% of youth participants of diverse representation (by gender, and ethnicity) will report having increased skills as the result of the trainings
Y1: Of the 160 youth activists and 60 female leaders who participated in training session, pre and post session evaluations demonstrate that participants increased their knowledge of the subject areas. For the religion and tolerance session post-activity reports show that 85% young people had an increased understanding of the topic, which is an increase from 64% in the pre-session report. In addition, 78% young people demonstrated increased an understanding of democracy and civil participation, which is an increase from 45% in the pre-activity report. Y2: 180 youth activists (89 women and 91 men; 37 Uzbeks, 140 Kyrgyz, and 3 Russians) participated in the youth camps. The 63 female leaders strengthened their capacity through participation in our trainings. According to reports of the trainers and pre/post participants assessments, 78% of participants increased their skills and knowledge
b) Percentage of youth participants (including youth leaders, delegates and camp participants) that report participating in youth-led initiatives to address issues affecting them and their communities.
Each year 80 % of youth participants will report that their initiatives were able to address the local safety issues affecting them and their communities
Y1: According to outcome harvesting sessions and youth groups' reflections 90% of initiatives were able to address the local issues Y2: Bi-annual outcome harvesting workshop with participation of youth participants demonstrated that above 80% of the youth projects’ resulted in positive outcomes and changes.
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDYemen_A013
Saferworld
Enhancing Women and Youth's Role in Peacebuilding in Yemen
This project will support communities in Yemen to become more stable and resilient to shocks, creating conditions for long-term development and poverty-reduction. Women’s and/or Youth Action Groups in four locations will work with their communities to identify, prioritise and respond to local conflict and security issues. Joint work with local councils will ensure communities’ needs are heard by local government. They will also form productive links with CSOs and NGOs across conflict divides to enable shared learning for collective problem-solving action and build CSO capacity. Inclusive local action will help communities manage conflict shocks and drivers, address immediate needs, promote mutual respect and contribute to peacebuilding.
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
Saferworld
National Organisation for Development of Society (NODS)
Alf Ba Civilization and Coexistence Foundation
MannionDaniels
Youth Without Borders
Saferworld
Leonie Northedge
lnorthedge@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
190460.61
255970.66
313920.82
359970.77
66305.99
55180.05
73686.37
43249.15
142502.07
203095.36
128947.22
41124.89
96528.78
77533.74
Saferworld
108970.68
MannionDaniels
Saferworld
42127.83
Saferworld
55243.95
Saferworld
1058323
MannionDaniels
Saferworld
64408.46
MannionDaniels
Saferworld
24237.20
MannionDaniels
Saferworld
13896.91
Saferworld
65089.43
MannionDaniels
Saferworld
51889
MannionDaniels
Saferworld
43786.02
Saferworld
54691.11
Updated as per instruction from donor
Saferworld
91258.23
62622.94
Saferworld
159682.33
102713.5
38349.4
Women take the lead: resolving a 30-year conflict in Yemen
Creating something new: Aswar Initiative for Peace and Development
Output 3.0 Networks, CSOs and NGOs at the local and national levels are working together more collaboratively, including across conflict divides, and contributing to a pool of programming models and resources, to implement and improve local actions that contribute to stable and resilient communities.
3.1 Number of dialogue meetings and/or spaces created for CSOs and CSO platforms including across conflict divides to share lessons learned on peacebuilding at governorate and national levels
3.2 Number of resources and programming examples/peacebuilding models shared by CSOs within the CSO platform
Progress on this output indicator expected to be reported by Quarter 4 of year 1.
Progress on this output indicator expected to be reported by Quarter 4 of year 1.
3.3 Number of peacebuilding initiatives (e.g. awareness raising, advocacy) implemented by CSO platforms at governorate or national level (including through peacebuilding grants)
Progress on this output indicator expected to be reported in Year 2.
Output 1.0 Women’s and/or youth action groups in four communities are collaborating with their local communities and existing community groups (both in their locales and elsewhere) to identify, prioritise and respond to local conflict and security issues.
1.1 Percentage of trained action group members who report having increased skills on peace and conflict concepts (including conflict- and gender-sensitivity) and practical skills (e.g. facilitation, problem analysis, action planning, monitoring and advocacy)
1.2 a) Number and diversity of community members and authorities involved in community dialogues.
1.2 b) Percentage of community members/authorities involved in community dialogues who are female.
32/80 community members are women
144/360 community members are women
144/360 community memebers are women
160/400 are female
1.3 Number of action plans produced and implemented (including seed grants) which respond to concerns raised through community consultations.
Outcome 1.0 Communities, civil society and local authorities in target locations, including marginalised groups such as women, youth, work together across conflict divides to improve peace and stability and/or work to mitigate the impact of the conflict in their local areas.
a) Percentage of programme stakeholders (youth/women groups, CSOs and Advisory Groups) that report initiatives effectively addressed their target issue
Outcome indicators will be measured starting from the mid-term review in Year 2 of the project.
b) Percentage of programme stakeholders who report increased trust and cooperation within the community
Outcome indicators will be measured starting from the mid-term review in Year 2 of the project.
c) 1. Number of youth/women action group members who feel that local council representatives are more responsive to community needs (including issues affecting marginalised groups)
Outcome indicators will be measured starting from the mid-term review in Year 2 of the project.
c) 2. Percentage of youth/women action group members who feel that local council representatives are more responsive to community needs (including issues affecting marginalised groups)
Outcome indicators will be measured starting from the mid-term review in Year 2 of the project.
Output 2.0 Local councils in four communities are more aware of community needs and are cooperating with women’s and/or youth action groups in responding to conflict issues and causes of insecurity.
a) Percentage of AG members that report having an improved understanding of community needs and peace/conflict concepts (e.g. conflict-sensitivity).
Output 2.2 Number of meetings between AGs/Local authority members and women/youth action groups
Output 2.3 Number of Advisory Group members that participate in and/or support the implementation of action plans/initiatives
GB-CHC-1043843-SIDA_Core_EZ*_2017-21
Saferworld
Preventing and reducing violent conflict and promoting cooperative approaches to security building
The objectives and expected results are: 1) Strengthen people’s security and access to justice; 2) Challenge gender norms that cause and perpetuate insecurity and violent conflict; 3) Defend and advance international norms and practices on conflict prevention, arms control and global peace and security; 4) Ensure international engagement in conflict-affected contexts is sensitive to conflict dynamics and contributes to sustainable peace; and 5) Promote inclusive peace processes and political transitions that address the drivers of violent conflict.
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
15000000
15000000
15000000
15000000
60000000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
7500000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
7500000
Saferworld
7500000
Saferworld
7500000
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
Saferworld
Outcome 1.2 Behaviour and relationship change: Number of successfully implemented action plans by communities and authorities and their relevance that affect provision of security and justice.
a) Number of implemented plans
119 new plans implemented in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 190)
103 new plans implemented in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 293)
120 new plans implemented in Y3 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 413)
Outcome 1.3 Systemic change: Number and Level (local, state, national, international) of changes in practice and policy by relevant actors in provision of security and justice
a) Number of CSOs
Unexpectedly one was achieved.
2 new CSOs in Y3 (Y2 & Y3 = 3)
2 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 6)
b) Number of authorities
3 new authorities in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 6)
2 new authorities in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 8)
2 new authorities in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 10)
c) Number of external actors
2 new external actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 4)
2 new external actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 6)
Outcome 3.1 Capacity Change: Number and description of CSOs, authorities and external actors provided with capacity-building on the development and implementation of globally-agreed frameworks (Global Goals/ATT)
a) Number of CSOs
10 new CSOs in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 20)
10 new CSOs in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 30)
10 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 40)
b) Number of authorities/external actors
5 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 15)
5 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 20)
8 new actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 28)
Outcome 4.1 Capacity Change: Number and description of external actors provided with training and resources on conflict sensitivity
a) Number of external actors
We received more training requests than anticipated.
6 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 17)
6 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 23)
7 new actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 30)
Outcome 5.3 Systemic change: Number, level and description of peacebuilding solutions or political transition processes relevant to peacebuilding/preventing violence (e.g. around elections, constitutional discussions, governance reforms)
a) Number of CSOs
1 new CSO in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 4)
1 new CSO in Y3 (Y1, Y2, & Y3 = 5)
1 new CSO in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 6)
b) Number of authorities
1 new authority in Y3. (Y1, Y2, & Y3 = 5)
1 new authority in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 6)
c) Number of external actors
Systemic change at this level took longer than anticipated.
3 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 4)
1 new actor in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 5)
1 new actor in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 6)
Outcome 2.3 Systemic change: Number and description of external actors who advocate for and/or include gendered drivers of conflict in their policy, programming and/or budgets on conflict response and peacebuilding efforts
a) Number of external actors
Unexpectedly 2 were achieved.
2 new external actors in Y3 (Y2 & Y3 = 5)
1 new external actor in Y4 (Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 6)
Outcome 2.1 Capacity Change: Number and description of communities/community-based mechanisms/networks, CSOs, and authorities and external actors that use SW Gender and Conflict toolkit, and/or are supported by SW to develop their expertise and programming responses to conflict that include challenging gender norms.
a) Number of community groups
2 of which are women only
70 new community groups in Y2, including 2 women only. (Y1 & Y2 = 172)
14 new community groups in Y3, including 1 women only. (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 186)
64 new community groups in Y4, including 2 women only. (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 250). Of the 250 groups, at least 7 will be women only and the remaining groups will have at least 35% women members.
b) Number of CSOs
18 new CSOs in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 92)
4 new CSO in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 96)
17 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 113)
C) Number of external actors
2 new external actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 9)
2 new external actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 11)
2 new external actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 13).
Outcome 2.2 Behaviour and relationship change: Significant examples of behaviour and relationship changes by communities/community groups and CSOs in at least three SW programmes that show how they are challenging the gender norms that contribute to conflict and insecurity.
a) Number of community groups
2 new community groups in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 4)
2 new community groups in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 6)
2 new community groups in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 8)
b) Number of CSOs
2 new CSOs in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 4)
1 new CSO in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 5)
2 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 7)
Outcome 3.2 Behaviour and relationship change: Significant examples of behaviour and relationship changes by CSOs and authorities working together constructively to combat divisive narratives, or to defend/implement globally-agreed norms and frameworks
a) Number of CSOs
5 new CSOs in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 10)
5 new CSOs in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 15)
5 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 20)
b) Number of authorities/external actors
Given our longer term engagement, we saw more significant examples of behaviour and relationship changes than anticipated
3 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 15)
4 new CSOs in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 19)
4 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 23)
Outcome 3.3 Systemic change: Number and description of norms and practices changed and their relevance.
a) Number of CSOs
4 new CSOs in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 5)
3 new CSOs in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 8)
3 new CSOs in Y4 ( Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 11)
b) Number of authorities/external actors
Given our longer term engagement, we have seen more progress than anticipated.
1 new actor in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 17)
2 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 19)
2 new actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 21)
Outcome 4.2 Behaviour and relationship change: Number/description of external actors who take up SW (and partners') recommendations on conflict-sensitive practice in conflict-affected states
a) Number of external actors
Given our longer term engagement, we saw more progress than anticipated.
5 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 17)
5 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 22)
5 new actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 27)
Outcome 4.3 Systemic change: Number and description of policies and practices changed and the systemic change to which they contribute.
a) Number of external actors
2 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 3)
2 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 5)
1 new actor in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 6)
Outcome 5.2 Behaviour and relationship change: Number and description of communities, CSOs, authorities, active in creating peacebuilding solutions and/or participating in generate consensus on political transitions relevant to peacebuilding
a) Number of communities/CSOs/authorities
We worked in additional contexts.
104 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 367)
104 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 471)
104 new actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 575)
Outcome 1.1 Capacity Change: Number of community groups, CSOs, and authorities supported by Saferworld to research, and advocate for changes to provision of security and justice, and the quality of that support
1.1 a) 1. Number of community groups
We received more interest for our trainings than anticipated.
15 new community groups in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 204)
17 new community groups in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 221)
16 new community groups in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 237)
1.1 a) 2. Percentage of memberships from community groups that are female
By Y4 at least 30% of memberships from all community groups are women
1.1 b) Number of CSOs
We received more interest for our trainings than anticipated.
6 new CSOs in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 98)
3 new CSOs in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 101)
2 new CSOs in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 103)
1.1 c) Number of authorities
We received more requests for training than anticipated.
90 new authorities in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 299)
90 new authorities in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 389)
Outcome 5.1 Capacity Change: Number and description of communities, CSOs, authorities and external Actors who receive support and capacity development from SW on methodology for peace-building, conflict transformation, conflict-sensitive governance solutions.
5.1 a) 1. Number of individuals
There was more interest in our trainings than anticipated.
2625 new individuals in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 6,438)
1,500 new individuals in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 7,938). Figures in years 3 and 4 are estimates only; milestones and targets are highly dependent on contextual changes in individual country locations.
1000 new individuals in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 8938). Figures in years 3 and 4 are estimates only; milestones and targets are highly dependent on contextual changes in individual country locations.
5.1 a) 2. Percentage of individuals that are women
At least 45% of all individuals will be women.
5.1 b) Number of civil society actors
500 new actors in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 2787)
500 new actors in Y3 (Y1, Y2 & Y3 = 3287). Figures in years 3 and 4 are estimates only; milestones and targets are highly dependent on contextual changes in individual country locations.
250 new actors in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 3537). Figures in years 3 and 4 are estimates only; milestones and targets are highly dependent on contextual changes in individual country locations.
5.1 c) Number of authorities
500 new authorities in Y2 (Y1 & Y2 = 1834)
500 new authorities in Y3 (Y1, Y2, & Y3 = 2334). Figures in years 3 and 4 are estimates only; milestones and targets are highly dependent on contextual changes in individual country locations.
500 new authorities in Y4 (Y1, Y2, Y3 & Y4 = 2584). Figures in years 3 and 4 are estimates only; milestones and targets are highly dependent on contextual changes in individual country locations.
GB-CHC-1043843-PSFMyanmar_A008
Saferworld
Strengthening Community Security and Security Sector Governance in Myanmar
The aim of the project is to help build safer lives for communities in Karen, while contributing to the development of a security sector that is more responsive to the needs of communities in Myanmar.
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Myanmar
252468
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
36061
216251
144359
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
200418
Saferworld
182108
97201
Saferworld
111639
Saferworld
67387
Saferworld
47239
Saferworld
115880
Saferworld
95685
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
172196
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
67751
Saferworld
142188
Saferworld
184577
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
245498
Saferworld
248833
Peace Support Fund
Saferworld
198791
Saferworld
93734
Saferworld
36733
182636
Peace Support Fund
GB-CHC-1043843-UKAID_SouthSudan_A015
Saferworld
Contributing to Poverty Reduction through Community Security and Peacebuilding
Conflict-affected communities, formal and informal authorities, and civil society actors, collaboratively identify, prioritise, plan, and resolve conflict and insecurity issues, including women- and youth-specific concerns, build partnerships with other institutions committed to improving livelihoods, and bring their knowledge and expertise into dialogues on peace and security in the national arena.
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Grant prematurely terminated by the FCDO due to UK government budget cuts.
Saferworld
Grant Management
Eva Mutenga
Partnership Development Manager
+211915723535
emutenga@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
UAP Equatoria Tower, Hai Neem, First Flour, Wing B, Juba, South Sudan
419167.85
1065461
1398060
477289.19
303119.19
Department for International Development
Saferworld
273171.53
Department for International Development
Saferworld
275560.02
Saferworld
318525.57
Saferworld
297544.17
Saferworld
252948.04
Department of International Development
Saferworld
372248.87
Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office
Saferworld
279373.29
Saferworld
3359977.75
Grant terminated due to FCDO budget cuts. Incoming commitment from FCDO on 17 August 2018 was 3,998,791.94. Final commitment amount from FCDO in May 2021 £3,359,977.75
Department for International Development
Saferworld
480140.14
309536.05
236222.65
Department of International Development
272772.41
Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office
Saferworld
454755
Saferworld
360690.94
Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office
Saferworld
167319.98
268982.30
Saferworld
392347.12
Department of International Development
Saferworld
351795.78
Saferworld
57167.59
Department for International Development
Saferworld
163361.78
Department for International Development
Saferworld
4006.85
Saferworld
159292.02
Saferworld
213593.27
Saferworld
198638.48
Department for International Development
Saferworld
259898.02
Saferworld
Output 2.0:Local, sub-national and national (formal and informal) authorities (including state and non-state security providers) regularly consult with communities, including women and youth, on local conflict and insecurity issues.
2.1 Number of roundtables conducted between formal and/or informal authorities and CSOs with community representatives to address local peace and security issues in coordinated manner. (Disaggregated by county and state-level roundtable)
Target achieved for the period.
To date, 25 (114) County and State-level roundtable conducted between formal and/or informal authorities and CSOs with community representatives to address local peace and security concerns in coordinated manner.
2.2 Number of briefing papers produced and disseminated to relevant formal and/or informal authorities and CSOs to advocate for policy changes at the local and state-level.
Though we planned to conduct state-level round table that leads to the production of briefing paper next year, the dissolution of state and county governments due to the peace process compelled us to put it off.
To date, 4 (67%) briefing papers from the State-level roundtable reflections produced and disseminated. We did not conduct state-level roundtable in Twic East because of the flash floods that displaced nearly entire populations towards the end of 2020. Though we conducted State-level roundtable in Malakal, we did not produce a briefing paper for the meeting due to some concerns around conflict-sensitivity.
2.3 Number and types of collaboration made between formal and informal authorities and community to address local conflict and insecurity concerns.
14 (116%). Achieved above the target. This is very encouraging achievement. The gist of the project is to enhance collective and collaborative analysis and response to community peace and security concerns. To achieve that, authorities and communities have to work together as partners to develop joint solutions and to address community-identified conflict and insecurity issues. Engaging formal and informal authorities through county-level roundtables created a good opportunity for the communities to raise their issues and get support from the authorities. Should we be able to facilitate state-level roundtables, we would highly likely overachieve.
To date, 90 (107) collaboration made between formal and informal authorities and community to address local conflict and insecurity concerns.
Outcome 1.0: Conflict-affected communities, formal and informal authorities, and civil society actors, collaboratively identify, prioritise, plan, and resolve conflict and insecurity issues, including women- and youth-specific concerns, build partnerships with other institutions committed to improving livelihoods, and bring their knowledge and expertise into dialogues on peace and security in the national arena.
1.1 Proportion of Community Action Groups (CAGs) who perceive that the overall local conflict and insecurity situation have been improved in the past 12 months. (On a scale of 1-5)
Although the 35 per cent is relatively low compared to our 80% target, we believe that there has been significant progress towards achieving peace across different locations. The low percentage also can be attributed to locations, such as Cueibet, that experienced increased inter-/intra-community conflicts and generalized insecurity characterised by cattle raiding and revenge killings.
To date, 85% (17 out of 20) community action groups (CAGs) perceived that the overall local conflict and insecurity situation in their community have been improved in the past 12 months
1.2 Proportion of Community Action Groups (CAGs) who perceive that the formal and/or informal authorities are more responsive to their needs and priorities in the past 12 months.(On a scale of 1-5)
Similar to comments in outcome indicator One above, the 30% of CAGs who perceived that the formal and/or informal authorities are more responsive to their needs and priorities in the past 12 months represents a significant improvement of relationship between authorities and communities compared to when the project started. This positive perception also indicates a paradigm shift in a context that is predominantly authoritarian, where security is the sole preserve of government, and authorities decide everything regarding security while communities have nothing to say or contribute.
To date, 75% (15 out of 20) of community action groups (CAGs) perceived that the formal and/or informal authorities are more responsive to their needs and priorities in the past 12 months.
1.3 Number and % of local conflict and insecurity issues, including women and youth-specific concerns that are addressed and resolved by communities structure (community action groups) with the support from formal and/or informal authorities.
The 128 is the target for milestone 3 while the target for year 2 was 24 of which we achieved 23, representing 96% of the Year 2 milestone achieved. This followed the technical support provided to the CAGs through trainings and also seed-funded action plans. Initially, we focused on building the capacity of CAGs in conflict analysis, problem-solving, action planning, conflict/and gender-sensitivity for them to gain better understanding of our community security and peacebuilding approaches.
To date, 116 (91%) local conflict and insecurity concerns, including women and youth-specific issues resolved by community action groups (CAGs) mechanism.
1.4 Number of advocacy initiatives carried out by CSO partners and state-level civil society platform that changed practices and/or policies of local authorities or other key security actors.
The target for milestone 3 for year 2 was 8 and we achieved 9 representing 113% overachievement. Following the establishment of CSO platforms in Cueibet, Gok Machar, Malakal and Twic East, Saferworld and partners strengthened the advocacy skills of the CSO platforms through customized basic advocacy trainings. Logistical support was also provided to support the CSO actors to facilitate meetings to discuss community related issues and advocacy initiatives.
To date, 30 (94%) advocacy initiatives carried out by CSO partners and civil society platform changed the practices and/or policies of local authorities, service providers and other key security actors and helped to address community peace and security concerns.
Output 3.0 Civil society (including for women and youth-focused organisations) are able to build consensus and to individually and collectively advocate at all levels on peace and security issues with formal and informal authorities.
3.1 Number of state-level civil society platforms established and/or supported to collectively advocate on community peace and security concerns.
6 (150%). Achieved above the target. 2 CSO platforms which planned for next year, established this year ahead of time.
To date, 18 (113%) civil society advocacy meeting conducted at state-level. The CSO platforms served as space for CSOs to come together and work jointly on matters affecting people in each state. Their role in amplifying and escalating community security concerns to authorities was critical in our peacebuilding work as well as for sustainability beyond Saferworld support and FCDO funding.
3.2 Number of relevant civil society organisations represented at national-level civil society advocacy forum.
0 (Establish all state-level CSOs platforms and conduct at least one CSO roundtable in each of the 6 location so that CSO start to discuss and identify communities issues that eventually will be linked to the national-level civil society advocacy forum next year.
To date, 47 (147%) relevant civil society organisations represented at the State-level civil society advocacy forum. Delays in the formation of state governments coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic and floods in Twic East curtailed our initial plans to hold a national advocacy forum with representatives from state-level CSOs platforms. In addition, the re-introduction of the ten states in 2020 in place of the 32 states disorganized CSO platforms that were founded on the basis of the defunct 32 states. As a result, these six state-level meetings were conducted instead of 1 national-level advocacy forum to strengthen the capacity of CSOs in the states.
3.3 Number of briefing papers produced and disseminated from national-level civil society platform to advocate for policy changes at state and national-level
0 (Discussion of all state-level CSO platform meetings are documented. The state-level discussions will feed into the national-level briefing paper together with the findings and recommendation coming from the national-level CSO forum which is planned for next year.)
CSOs national policy briefing was not produced as planned due to unexpected project termination by the FCDO.
Impact 1.0: Selected conflict-affected communities in up to six locations (counties) across South Sudan are more stable, peaceful, secure, and resilient, creating conditions that allow for more sustainable livelihoods and long-term socio-economic development.
1.1 Evidence of programme beneficiaries who explain how the programme has reduced local conflict and insecurity in their community.
There is no baseline values because the indicator will be measured at the end of the project by the final evaluation.
The target value is at 1 as this is a qualitative indicator to be measure by the final project evaluation.
The project was prematurely terminated by the FCDO therefore, a final project evaluation was not carried out.
1.2 Evidence of programme beneficiaries who explain how the programme has improved access to basic services and socio-economic stability of in their community.
There is no baseline values because the indicator will be measured at the end of the project by the final evaluation.
The target value is at 1 as this is a qualitative indicator to be measure by the final project evaluation.
The project was prematurely terminated by the FCDO therefore, a final project evaluation was not carried out.
Output 4.0: International actors (including local donors) have increased knowledge and evidence on local conflict dynamics and how these link to the national conflict, to push on behalf of communities and civil society for more inclusive decision-making and national dialogue processes.
4.1 Number of relevant national and international actors reached by national-level roundtable and/or one-to-one meetings.
0 (Though we planned to conduct state-level round table, the dissolution of state and county governments due to the peace process compelled us to put it off. This means the national-level roundtable may be affected next year.)
To date, 25 (125%) national and international actors reached through our one-to-one meetings to disseminate the briefing paper.
4.2 Number of briefing papers produced and disseminated to the targeted national and international actors.
0 (Due to the dissolution of state and county governments, all state-level formal and informal authorities roundtable not happened this year. This means the production of briefing paper may be affected next year as well.)
To date, 1 (100%) national-level briefing papers produced and disseminated to the targeted national and international actors through the one-to-one meetings.
4.3 Number and types of collaboration made between relevant international actors with communities and CSOs to address local conflict and insecurity issues including community livelihood concerns.
To date, 21 (116%) collaboration made with other INGOs and UN agencies to collective respond to community needs and priorities including their livelihood. Some of these involved UNHCR, UNDP, UNPOL, UNMISS, CARE, IOM, CORDAID, DRC, SSRC, World Vision and others INGOs. For instance, in response to CAGs’ concerns on delayed police responses to security incidents due to lack of transportation, UNDP donated 20 bicycles to police to facilitate patrols in Bentiu town. In Gok Machar, the United Nations Interim Security Forces for Abyei (UNISFA) employed 30 young men and women on rotational basis following our engagement with UNISFA. In Malakal, UNPOL provided three tractors while UNMISS assigned a peacekeeping battalion to support CAGs in their 3-day initiative of clearing debris and metal scraps (remnants of war) in Malakal town, and also UNHCR and UNMISS trained 40 representatives from 3 communities and PoC in Malakal town (25 women and 15 men) on sandal production. As a result, all 40 beneficiaries have established own businesses and are producing sandals as a means of earning income to support their families. This initiative was not pre-planned but happened as a result of community meetings with UN agencies through our CAG platform. In Juba, Saferworld engaged the Ministry of Peacebuilding to establish a ‘Peace Actors Forum’ resulting in enhanced coordination and collaboration amongst peacebuilding agencies.
Output 1.0: Communities (particularly women and youth), through up to 20 CAGs, have increased knowledge and skills in conflict analysis, issue identification and prioritisation, joint action planning, inclusivity, conflict resolution and dialogue, and conflict and gender sensitivity.
1.1 Number of Community Action Groups (CAGs) established with a composition of at least 35% women and 35% youth from the community. (Disaggregated by sex, age and disability status).
12 Community Action Groups were established across 4 project locations namely Twic East, Maridi, Gok Machar and Cueibet.
Target achieved. Cumulative total for project period is 20 community action group established
20 (100%) community action groups established during the project period. All of the CAGs were active in the community work.
1.2 Number of community action groups (CAGs) meetings/forums conducted to discuss on local conflict and insecurity issues, to develop and review implementation of action plans. (Disaggregated by CAGs).
10 community action groups monthly meetings were conducted across the project location with the exception of 2 groups in Gok Machar who could not conduct the meeting due to time contraints.
Achieved above target, CAG meetings are conducted on a monthly basis, however in some cases there may arise urgent matters that require CAGs to meet more than once in a month.
To date, 486 (102%) CAG meetings facilitated to discuss and identify their local conflict and insecurity issues and explore ways to address issues affecting communities. The meetings is also platforms where CAGs plan and reviews their activities and action plans on-going manner. From the 486 meetings, about 143 (29%) were initiated and implemented by the CAGs without financial support from Saferworld or partner during the project period.
1.3 Number of community action plans (CAPs) implemented by CAGs to address prioritised local conflict and insecurity concerns. (Disaggregated by CAGs, action plan type, seed funded or community initiative).
4 (138%). Achieved above the target. This is because community action groups implemented about 21 action plans (more than the initial plan) by their own initiatives or without direct Saferworld financial support.
To date, 137 (90%) action plans implemented through CAGs. Out of this, only 69 (50%) action plans supported by SW (as Seed Fund) and the remaining 68 (50%) action plan were initiated and implemented by community without financial support from Saferworld and partners. This shows community commitment to engage and address their own peace and security issues even without any financial support from Saferworld or partners in the future.
GB-CHC-1043843-ECKenya_M010_EIDHR2017_393-241
Saferworld
“Not worth a penny” – Preventing extra-judicial killings of urban poor in Nairobi’s settlements
The proposed action addresses extra-judicial killings (EJKs) and increases respect of (inter)national Human Rights (HR) standards by law enforcement through strengthening the capacities of the two stakeholder groups that are, and should be, the first line of support for victims and their relatives: grassroots human rights defenders (GHRDs) and police.
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
SAFERWORLD
Funding
James Wangombe
Funding, Grant Management and Programme Development Manager
254202733250
jwangombe@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
P.O. Box 21484-00505, Nairobi, Kenya
116179.14
84976
18874.96
Income for October2019 to December 2019
EIDHR
Saferworld
201155
We are part of a consortium with PBI International being the lead. The main donor is European Commission but we receive our funds through PBI.
EIDHR
Saferworld
25144
1st installment -Q1
EIDHR
Saferworld
10810
Applies to period between April to June 2018
Saferworld
18927
Relates to the period between July to September 2018
Saferworld
23111
Relates to the period October -December 2018
Saferworld
23288
Relates to the period January to March 2019
Saferworld
33969
EIDHR
Saferworld
50708
2nd Installment -Q2 & Q3
EIDHR
Saferworld
Output 1.2. Journalists have acquired tools in conflict sensitive reporting and are able to report cases on EJKs and other HR violations in a nuanced manner using sensitive and responsive terms that show respect for the victims
20 journalists (3 mainstream media editors, who are ultimately responsible for their media content, 10 mainstream media journalists, 3 community journalists and 4 digital media writers) will be trained on conflict sensitive reporting
Number of journalists that have been trained on conflict sensitive journalism with regards to EJKs and other HR violations.
10 journalists have been trained by Saferworld as part of a project around elections.
Y1 Q3: 20 (9 male, 11 female) journalists were trained between 17th – 19th December 2018. Y1 Q4: Saferworld brought together 36 editors and journalists (26 male, 10 female) from the main stream and community media stations for a sensitization workshop on conflict sensitive reporting of extra judicial killings (EJKs).
Output 2.1. Police officers and court officers have the knowledge and skills on (inter) national human rights standards and understand the crucial role that GHRDs play when asking for increased accountability by political leaders.
Police officers and court officers trained on the (inter)national human rights standards and the role of GHRDs in relation to accountability.
Number of police officers and court officers trained on the (inter)national human rights standards and the role of GHRDs in relation to accountability.
Q4; Y1: This activity has not taken place as SW has not been able to acquire police consent Q1 Y2: A Security Stakeholder mapping was conducted in Mathare, Kamukunji and Embakasi North constituencies in Nairobi County targeting 6 police stations, 6 community policing committees Q6; Y2: On 11th – 12th July 2019, 38 (14 female and 24 male) participants were trained on human rights approaches to criminal justice process. A further 28 (6 female and 22 male) officers were trained on effective and efficient criminal justice system on 13 September 2019.
Output 2.2. Education and information materials developed and published in form of a handbook for use by police, court officers and oversight bodies.
Number of education and information materials on relevant Human rights instruments in relation to EJKs.
Q4; Y1:This activity has not taken place due to lack of police consent. Q5; Y2: This output was redesigned to develop training guide and IEC materials for the police and court Users committee. In the quarter Saferworld advertised and recruited 2 consultants who will develop training materials to be used in engagement with the police and Court Users Committee Q6; Y2: In July 2019 Saferworld recruited a consultant to conduct training for the Court Users Committee and develop the Police handbook on human rights legislation in relation to Extra Judicial Killings. Q7;Y2: Saferworld in collaboration with the Makadara Court Users Committee (CUC) held 2 outreach forums in Mathare and Dandora on 4th October and 18th November 2019 respectively. Also, Saferworld shared copies of the handbook with Hon. Heston Nyagah (Chief Magistrate) who is the Chairperson of Makadara Court Users Committee for review ahead of the validation meeting scheduled for February 2020.
Output 4.1. The review of SDG16 at the high-level political forum in 2019 will be used as an occasion to link the project’s work to efforts by other actors involved in SDG implementation and raise their awareness for the human rights dimension of SDG16
Multi-stakeholder dialogues and participatory consultation processes on SDG implementation in relation to EJKs are taking place in the run up to the review.
GB-CHC-1043843-DFIDKenya_DAI_A014_G019
Saferworld
Promoting Sustainable Pastoralism through Improved Rangeland Management Governance in Samburu County, Kenya
The project intends to address the problem of weak natural resource management systems primarily in Samburu and Baringo counties, and overlapping into other counties that constitute the larger northern Kenya region, thereby contributing to sustainable natural resource utilisation, improved livelihoods and reduced conflict over scarce resources. The project will also engage with other frontier counties through their regional platforms, the Frontier Counties Development Council and the Amaya Triangle Initiative.
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
SAFERWORLD
Funding Department
James Wangombe
Funding, Grant Management and Programme Development Manager
254202733250
jwangombe@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk
P.O. Box 21484-00505, Nairobi, Kenya
Samburu and Frontier Counties of Northern Kenya
Project takes place in Kenya - Samburu and Northern Frontier countries
450000
477065
241230
98400
Q1 Disbursement for the Project under the DFID Direct Grant
89078
Q2 payment
Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
155272
Relates to Q3 expenditure (Jan - March 2019)
Saferworld
78615
Relates to Q2 expenditure (Oct - Dec 2018)
Saferworld
53066
Relates to Q1 expenditure (July - Sept 2018)
Saferworld
222455
Q3 Payment
Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
67556
Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
927065
Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
Impact: Inclusive and accountable governance of natural resources (such as land, pasture and water) thereby contributing to sustainable peace, security and community resilience in northern Kenya
Impact Indicator 1: Number of significant improvements in implementation of NRM practices, policies and legislation by communities and county governments in Northern Kenya
Includes bi-annual small scale perception ranking, County rangeland and development policies, ATI and FCDC secretariat and Participatory Assessments.
Q3: 0. No improvement observed this reporting period. The policy engagement process with the County officials is still at the nascent stages. This will gain momentum after the completion of the policy review process Q5: 1. At the community level, formation of various management committees on water and grazing areas has made different communities groups access water and grazing reducing conflicts among them. 2. Formation of SABALA as inter county platform by three communities (Samburu, Baringo and Laikipia counties) will enhance cross border relations and further reduce resource-based conflicts. 3. At FCDC level, members of Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum embarked on lobbying for policies and budgets to be allocated to Peace and security directorate to support Peace and Cohesion activities at county levels
Q4:0.The initial engagement with Member of County Assembly (MCAs) and County Executive (CE) started in May 2019. From their participation in county official training in May and follow up conversations, noticeable commitment has been observed from MCAs to support the Rangeland management policy formulation process. Rangeland management and planned grazing policy was identified during technical review and confirmed during training as a priority focus for the county. The process of review and finalisation will be supported by the project in the next quarter.
Q5: 3 1. At the community level, formation of various management committees on water and grazing areas has made different communities groups access water and grazing reducing conflicts among them. 2. Formation of SABALA as inter county platform by three communities (Samburu, Baringo and Laikipia counties) will enhance cross border relations and further reduce resource-based conflicts. 3. At FCDC level, members of Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum embarked on lobbying for policies and budgets to be allocated to Peace and security directorate to support Peace and Cohesion activities at county levels
Q6: 5 1. In November 2019, the director of environment and natural resources, shared the draft Rangeland Management and Grazing policy with other heads of departments, National Government officials and other stakeholders at the county level to review the policy. The feedback will be submitted during the interface workshop scheduled for February 2020. 2. During Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum (PCSF) workshop in Lamu town, on 14th and 15th December 2019, the FCDC member counties came up with an action plan for this year 2020 on how they are going to implement the recommendations from the analysis of institutions, legal and policy frameworks report.
Output 3: FCDC and ATI member counties sets up a Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum (PCSF) that will lead on the development of strategies to address resource based conflict in the Amaya Triangle and the FCDC counties
Output Indicator 3.1: Number of individual or joint strategic documents developed to coordinate and guide peace processes by FCDC and ATI county governments
Q5: one strategic document around on the Peace and Cohesion Sector exists. The signing of the MoU by FCDC member counties on 15th August 2019 at Weston Hotel in Nairobi. In Addition, an analysis report for Institutional, legal and policy framework for peacebuilding and social cohesion with FCDC and CPD has been completed and final report has been submitted with key policy recommendations.
Q6:- 1.From the PCSF workshop held in Lamu, an action plan was developed drawn from the recommendations contained in the analysis report for institutional, legal and policy framework for peacebuilding in the FCDC counties 2. Using the findings from the analysis report, DLCI developed a peace and cohesion policy brief titled “Every life has equal value: renewing the institutional, policy and legal framework for Peacebuilding and social cohesion in Kenya”. It contains issues such as natural resource management, cross-border dynamics, livestock theft, anti-terrorism, and the control of drugs and small arms. The recommendations in this policy brief are aimed at transforming the framework within which all these highlighted issues can be addressed.
Outcome Indicator 3.2: Number of FCDC and ATI county governments signed up to the peace and cohesion sector forum, with clear terms of reference
Q4-12 counties(10 FCDC+2 non FCDC (Laikipia and Baringo ) .The 12 counties initiated processes towards the formation of Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum. Q5: The county governments include 10 members of FCDC, which include Lamu, Tana River, Garissa, Wajir, Mandera, Marsabit, Isiolo, Turkana, Samburu and West Pokot and additional 2 counties (Laikipia and Baringo Counties) which have applied to be members and are now part of Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum.
Q5:-The county governments include 10 members of FCDC, which include Lamu, Tana River, Garissa, Wajir, Mandera, Marsabit, Isiolo, Turkana, Samburu and West Pokot and additional 2 counties (Laikipia and Baringo Counties) which have applied to be members and are now part of Peace and Cohesion Sector Forum.
Output 4: Natural resource management stakeholders systematically access and uptake knowledge generated through learning and evidence to inform their collective advocacy influence on relevant policies and legislation at county and national levels.
Ouput Indicator 4.1: Number of stakeholders committed to the learning agenda
Q3: 25 stakeholders committed to the learning agenda. Q4: 7 stakeholders committed to the learning agenda. Q5: The representatives of the 32 stakeholders identified last quarter (April - June 2019) during Technical review of policies in Samburu county have been mobilised to participate in the earning event schedule for October 30 and 31, 2019. Q6:-Completed in Quarter 5. These stakeholders participated in the Learning event held on 29th to 31st October 2019.
Output Indicator 4.2: No. of case studies documented based on implementation of recommendations generated during learning events/forums
Q4- A case study has been developed on WCAGs and CAP engagements in Samburu county. The case study describes the formation, ward level engagement and their performance by end of this quarter. This case will be further developed in the next quarter. Q5 - This case study will be developed in the next quarter (October - December 2019). The case study will be around the support and strengthening of CPD secretariat and engagement among the member counties. Q6:-CPD engagement has faced a lot of challenges. A lot of effort is required to have CPD in its intended course. This case study will be developed in the next quarter.
Output 1: Pastoralist communities in Samburu and Baringo counties are empowered to individually and collectively engage county authorities on legislation and practices that support improved rangeland management.
Output Indicator 1.1: Number of Ward Community Action Groups(WCAGs) and County Action Platform(CAP) formed, trained and facilitated to develop the advocacy plan
5 WCAGs and 1 CAP have the capacity to engage the county government representation of women, youths, minority and marginalised groups formed and their capacity built.
Q2-Instead of the intended 6,5 ward based community action groups (WCAGS) were formed, trained and facilitated to undertake various actions plans, including resource mapping.This is because ChildFund, who are being funded by the same donor,took up one of the target wards, which was a measure aimed at avoiding duplication of effort and enhancing efficiency in the utilization of donor funds. Q3: 3 ward based action groups were formed in Baringo county. Q4-1 count Action Platform(CAP) was formed in Samburu county; with 30 members-23 male and 7 female. Q5 - 3 action plans supported during this reporting period. They include: a meeting held at Samburu Guest house by CAP member on 26th August 2019 to consolidate community issues on rangeland management; and a meeting held on 27th August 2019 between County officials from Department of environment, energy and Natural resources and CAP members on rangeland management policy on among communities that borders themselves in Laikipia, Samburu and Baringo counties. In Baringo county, a meeting was Tangulbei WCAGs to assess and support traditional grazing structure involved in conflict resolution was held. They participants agree to form a grazing committee to regulate the access to grazing areas.
Output Indicator 1.2: Number of instances of appropriate use of social accountability tools by WCAGs, CAPs and local CSO as part of engagement with county government on CCG
Few avenues exist to bring together all the stakeholders’
Q3-To be reported in the next reporting period. Q4-1. Members of the CAP had an interface meeting with MCAs and county executives on 4 key issues related to rangeland management (water, pasture forest and conflict). 2. In Waso and Wamba East, WCAGs held meetings with their MCAs to seek for implementation of priority rangeland management concerns in Samburu County. 3. In Waso, Loosuk ward, the WCAGs held a meeting with Land Committee where they discussed land issues and boundary. Q5 -One interface meeting held on August 27, 2019 between the County officials from Department of Environment, Energy and Natural resources to discuss the community policy related issues and how they should be included in the policy Q6:-Not done this quarter. This is planned for January - December 2020 during inter agency policy engagement.
Output Indicator 1.3: Number of collective actions initiated by citizens to engage county government as part of climate change mitigation climate change.
Q4 -In Wamba East WCAG led to the formation of water resource management committees for Mnanda Pump and Omo Sordo dam on the 20th May 2019 during the planning meeting held on 20th May 2019 at Wamba Catholic Parish. 2. In Baringo, Pokot community formed grazing committees in the Silale, Tangulbei and Churo wards to regulate access to grazing areas. Q5 - 1. In Suguta Marmar ward, the water management committee formed has effectively managed conflict that always arise from access to water resources by livestock herders and those fetching water for domestic use. 2. Formed inter county platform Known as SABALA (Samburu, Baringo and Laikipia) to manage access to water and pasture hence managing cross border conflict 3. Conflict was solved between Rendile herdsmen from Marsabit and Samburu youth in Suguta due to former intruding into Samburu grazing areas. Q6:-Not done this reporting period. Planned for next reporting period
Outcome: County governments in northern Kenya individually and collectively formulate and/or adopt responsive and coherent policies, legislation and practices on natural resource management that address communities’ priorities, enhances peace and resilience to climate change.
Outcome Indicator 1.1 : Level of integration of climate change in planning
Includes County Intergrated Development Plans, Annual Development plans, County Budget and Review and outlook paper, County Fiscal paper, Estimates of revenue and expenditure, Annual contingency Coordination Framework
Q4-Some climate change related initiatives were included in Samburu County Fiscal Strategy Paper (CFSP), February 2019. They include improving irrigation schemes, planting of drought resistant crops and management of water resources such as water catchment areas. From the Samburu Website -http://www.samburu.go.ke, the Ministry of Water, Environment, Natural Resources & Energy has stated that in the year 2019/2020 its promoting sustainable land management approaches, undertaking natural resource inventory and conduct establishment, training and strengthening of natural resource management institutions such as Water Resource User Associations (WRUAs), Sand harvesting groups, Charcoal Producers Associations (CPA’s), and Community Forest Associations (CFA’s) in the county. A zero draft of climate change policy and County Environment action plans (CEAPS). Q5: Currently the Department of Environment, Energy and Natural resources is in the process of developing a policy on rangeland management. In the Policy, 2.6 has been dedicated to climate change, effects and coping strategies in Samburu county. Q6:The Samburu Rangeland Management and grazing draft policy has section 2.6 that addresses matters on climate change. It has information on change, effects and coping strategies in Samburu county.
Outcome Indicator 1.2: Level of institutional knowledge of climate change issues
Includes media/press statements, Rangeland management policy/framework
Q4-Both Samburu and Baringo counties have embarked on policy formulation (Rangeland management and planned grazing policy - Samburu county and Climate change policy - Baringo County). It has been observed that county projects on rangeland have been recorded in the annual county progress reports and County officials (MCA and County Executives) have been trained on Climate change with support from project and other organisations such Food and Agriculture Organisation and Child Fund. Q5: For this quarter, the score of 2 relate to Samburu county development of rangeland management policy. It is now at draft stage after consultations with communities Q6:The score remains at 2 during this reporting period. The community policy issues on rangeland management were incorporated in the draft policy, section 2.4 and 2.5 awaiting interagency review at the county to be done next quarter before being submitted to County government for deliberations, review and ratification
Outcome Indicator 1.3: Number of instances of state responsiveness to citizen engagement or institutional strengthening (in climate change governance, service delivery or Oversight)
Includes media/press statements, Rangeland management policy/framework
Q5: Willingness of the county officials to have a meeting with CAP members to receive the community issues related to rangeland management policy is an indicator of Samburu county government being responsive to community concerns that they face as pastoralist communities. The issues were incorporated into policy Q6:As stated in indicator 1.1., community policy issues related to rangeland management have been captured in section 2.4 and 2.5. The fact that the county officials took considerations of these issues into the policy shows the county government responsiveness in citizen engagement.
Output 2: Samburu County government and the ATI Secretariat develop legislation / policies and frameworks on natural resources management that are in line with climate change governance and responsive to needs of the pastoralists communities
Output Indicator 2.1: Number of county government officials trained on policy development in rangeland management and pastoral resource management.
30 county officials from Samuru county trained
Q4-36 participants (21M: 14F) County officials that included 26 MCAs, 9 County Assembly officials (a Speaker, deputy speaker, 4 staff from Clerk office, Legal counsel, Hansard and Sergeant. Only 1 Chief officer of special programme participated . Q5- The project will continue to engage with the 36 trained in the last quarter for further policy development engagement in the next quarter. Q6:-This was completed in Quarter 4
Output Indicator 2.2: Number of policy briefs or legislative recommendations identifying citizen priorities in climate change governance submitted to county governments by WCAGs, CAPS or CSOs
Q3: 1 expert paper with recommendations has already been produced from the policy review process. Q4-1.Policy recommendations from Technical policy review of Samburu county, 2. Recommendation from the county officials training report and; 3. Recommendations from Cooperation for Peace and Development (CPD) engagement . Q5- Facilitated by policy experts/ consultants, a policy issues document detailing community policy concerns and policy gaps in the zero draft rangeland management and planned grazing policy was done. Policy issues and gaps informed the revision of the zero draft to initial draft of the rangeland management and planned grazing policy Q6:-During November - December 2019, there was no policy related document produced by the WCAGs/CAP. This is planned for next quarter when communities through WCAGs will engage other county government and other agencies as the Draft policy is being reviewed.
Output Indicator 2.3: Number of draft inclusive rangeland management policies, plans, legislation, regulations developed or revised by county governments.
Q5: A draft rangelands management and planned grazing policy was developed by the Samburu county department of environment. The policy includes priority areas/issues identified by communities through the WCAGs and the CAP. Q6:-A draft Rangeland management and planned grazing policy has been produced awaiting the inter agency review.
GB-CHC-1043843-EIDHR-UGANDA-H017
Saferworld
Amplifying women’s voices on peace, security and justice in Karamoja
The overall objective of the project is to contribute to the promotion of the rights of marginalised women and children for the realisation of inclusive peace, security and justice in conflict affected communities in the Karamoja region. The proposed action draws on more than 15 years of CECORE and Saferworld’s joint collaboration and institutional expertise in conflict resolution, peacebuilding and rights-based approaches in northern Uganda and the Karamoja region. The proposed action will be implemented in the sub-counties of Rupa Sub County in Moroto District, Karita Sub County in Amudat District, and Kalapata and Kaabong sub counties in Kaabong District. And the projected action’s target is 12,000 (7,000 females: 5,000 males) indirect beneficiaries.
European Commission - Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development
Programme Team
David Othieno Opoya
Regional Funding and Programme Development Manager
256 702241430
dothieno@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk
P.O BOX 8415, PILKINGTON ROAD, NIC BUILDING, FOURTH FLOOR, KAMPALA, UGANDA
343906650
100000000
343906650
European Commission - Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development
Saferworld
Output 1.3: Communities (women, girls, men and boys) receive information on gender-related conflict issues, enabling them to understand the link between gender norms and conflict
Coverage of local radio stations where radio spot messages are disseminated
districts
Output 1.1: Community members receive findings of the gender conflict analysis in form of IEC materials
Number of community members who received IEC materials
Output 1.2: Communities (including marginalised women) receive information on their rights to land, livelihood, and engage in political participation at the community level.
Number of attendees at awareness raising events
1050 Men, 1050 Women, 1050 Girls, 1050 Boys
Output 3.2: Local and national government institutions engage in consultation with communities, including women, on rights, peace and justice.
No. consultative meetings held with communities by district and national level authorities
Outcome 1: Findings of conflict analysis are integrated into awareness raising programmes of key target groups
Number of events/examples during which there was reference and or utilisation of the findings from the assessment
Outcome 2: Community members including marginalised women have knowledge on conflict analysis and advocacy
No of conflict analysis conducted by local community members.
Output 2.1: Community representatives and local government receive training on advocacy, gender sensitivity, conflict resolution
No. of community leaders and local government officials who participate in trainings
63 Women, 27 Men
Specific objective 1: Improved community awareness of gender norms and rights, as well as rights violations that perpetuate the exclusion of women from peace, security and justice processes that affect them, and offer no protection for women and children from instability.
% of targeted beneficiaries that demonstrate an understanding of their rights
Impact: To contribute to the promotion of the rights of marginalised women and children for the realisation of inclusive peace, security and justice in conflict affected communities in the Karamoja region
Status of human rights situation in Karamoja
Qualitative update on the status
Outcome 3: Women are empowered to participate in decision making processes on peace,security and justice
Number of women-led advocacy initiatives at local government level
Specific Objective 2: Increased capacity of communities (including women affected by conflict) to advocate to their local and national authorities for the realisation of their rights to land and livelihoods, political participation at community level, and freedom from all forms of violence for women and children
Number of women-led advocacy campaigns around women rights
Specific objective 3: Constructive engagement between authorities (local and national) and communities affected by conflict on the rights of women to land and livelihoods, political participation at community level to work towards freedom from all forms of violence and discrimination for women and children
Number of resolutions and decisions (by local and national authorities) that reflect the priorities of women
GB-CHC-1043843-DGF-UGANDA-H019
Saferworld
Promoting conflict sensitive land based investments across Karamoja and Northern Uganda
The project seeks to promote more transparent and conflict and gender based business investments in mineral, agribusiness and related infrastructure development in selected five districts of Karamoja and Northern Uganda.
Democratic Governance Facility
Saferworld
Country Programme
David Othieno Opoya
Regional Funding and Programme Development Manager
+256702241430
dothiono@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk
P.O Box 8415, Kampala Uganda, NIC Building, 4th Floor, Pilkington Road
241790628
241790628
Democratic Governance Facility
Saferworld
Output 1.2: Enhanced capacity of commercial actors, authorities and community representatives in conflict and gender sensitivity, conflict resolution and rights protection
1.2A: Number of community members reached with information on conflict issues, land rights and peaceful mechanisms of land acquisition.
1.2B: Number of civic education/awareness campaigns (civic education, human rights, anti-corruption)
Output 1.1: Increased awareness on conflict issues, land rights, and peaceful mechanisms of land conflict resolution among communities, commercial actors and/or authorities
1.1A: Number of project beneficiaries who participate in training events
1.1B: Evidence of application of gender and conflict-sensitive approaches in the natural resource governance (by community representatives, commercial actors and authorities)
Output 2.1: Consensus building forums between communities affected by land based investments and commercial actors, local/national governments established and or strengthened
2.1 A: Number of joint action plans developed and/or implemented by local communities, authorities and commercial actors
2.1B: Number of conflict prevention, peace building and transitional justice events conducted
2.1C: Number of consensus building events held
Outcome 1: Reduced incidences of conflict around land based investments
Outcome 1 indicator 1: Proportion of target beneficiaries who report reduction in land and mineral related conflict
In Karamoja and Northern Region
Outcome 1 indicator 2: Proportion of local community members who report improved relationship with commercial actors
In Karamoja and Northern Uganda regions
Output 2.3: Collaboration and networking among CSOs at sub national and national levels for joint advocacy on conflict risks in the natural resources sector strengthened.
2.3A: Number (with evidence) of CSOs that integrate conflict-sensitive approaches in natural resource governance
2.3B: Number of joint advocacy initiatives conducted to inform national level policy processes
2.3C: Number of cases (examples) where input from CSOs are taken on board by elected representatives, and authorities
Impact statement: Sustainable peace and natural resource development in Northern Uganda and Karamoja
Impact indicator 1: Proportion of target beneficiaries who report that they are more secure and safe
In Karamoja and Northern Region
Impact Indicator 2: Evidence of communities accessing more benefits from natural resources.
Outcome 2: Improved transparency and responsiveness of local and national government structures in preventing and resolving land based conflicts
Outcome 2 indicator 1: Number of meetings in which local and national government structures share information on land and mineral governance with communities
Outcome 2 Indicator 2: Number of land and mineral related conflict issues addressed by local and national governments structures
Outcome 2 Indicator 3: Evidence of democratic institutions changing policies or practices (behaviors) as a result of DGF interventions
In Karamoja and Northern Uganda
Output 1.3: Improved appreciation, integration and application of conflict and gender sensitive approaches in natural resource governance
1.3: Examples/evidence of increased awareness among commercial actors
Output 2.2: Engagement between duty bearers and rights holders on natural resource governance improved
2.2A: Number of citizens who report having engaged with government representatives and private investors
Output 2.2B: Number of public forums where government/state institution representatives interact with the citizens and or CSOs to influence a legislation and or policy framework
2.2C: Number of monitoring reports submitted to oversight bodies by individuals involved in DGF interventions
GB-CHC-1043843-IRISHAID-UGANDA-H018
Saferworld
Strengthening Inclusive Development and Equal Access to Resources for Marginalised Citizens in Uganda
The overall aim of this project is to contribute to greater inclusion and more equitable access to resources and benefits of development, and realisation of natural resource rights for poor and marginalised youth, women and men in Uganda. The focus of the project is exclusively sub-Saharan Africa (Uganda) which aligns with Irish Aid’s geographic focus. Saferworld and RICE-WN will scale-up the participation of poor and marginalised people in decision-making relating to natural resource access, use, control and ownership, because their exclusion is a key driver of conflict in Northern Uganda. In three districts, Saferworld will use its conflict-sensitive and rights-based approach to challenge social and gender norms that perpetuate violence and inequality; empower people to raise their concerns collectively with district authorities and private sector investors; monitor the inclusion of their priorities; and hold decision makers to account. The violation of rights will be documented at the household level to improve access to justice and support active engagement.
Irish Aid
Saferworld
While the MoU with Irish Aid runs for 24 months, the contract is renewed on annual basis.
Programme Team
David Othieno Opoya
Regional Funding and Programme Development Manager
256 702241430
dothieno@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk
P.O BOX 8415, PILKINGTON ROAD, NIC BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR, KAMPALA, UGANDA
180000
180000
Irish Aid
Saferworld
180000
IRISH GOVERNMENT
Output 1.1.2: Up to 9 formal structures (3 per district), including district officials, sub-county court committees and Area Land Committees receive accompaniment and mentoring support to implement their action plans.
Number and type of stakeholders mentored and accompanied to effectively participate in the governance of natural resources.
Output 1.1.3: Up to 4 community groups (2 per district) receive small grants to implement their action plan
Number of action plans implemented using small grants to community groups
Output 3.1.2. Up 180 members of CAGs participate in dialogue forums at local, district and national level.
Proportion of members of CAGs who participate in local, district and national dialogue meetings
Output 3.1.3: Three multi-level advocacy meetings at local (talking circles), district and national-level, established to provide opportunities for dialogue.
Number of meetings at local, district and national-levels held with key stakeholders to advocate on conflict and natural resource governance.
Outcome 3: Marginalised communities in target locations are more informed and empowered to realise and protect their rights and are able to advocate for inclusion and equal access to resource
Proportion of local, district and national level dialogue meetings on natural resource governance with the active participation and representation of target communities
Outcome 1. Informal and formal structures, CSOs and government officials use conflict-sensitive, gender-sensitive and rights-based approaches to inform their decisions around resources and development, and to take appropriate actions on development, service delivery, conflict resolution and natural resource governance
Proportion of stakeholders who report using their skills and knowledge on human rights, conflict sensitivity and advocacy to inform their actions on natural resource governance
Outcome 2: Marginalised communities in target locations actively participate in and influence decision-making processes and actions of their authorities and private sector actors to take into account their perspectives, needs and priorities in relation to natural resources and development
Evidence of stakeholders who proactively and independently undertake local initiatives on natural resource governance
Proportion of private sector actors reached with information who report using the information to inform their policies and.or practices in relation to acquisition and use of natural resources
Output 1.1.1: Two capacity building trainings (one per district) on conflict-sensitive governance, human rights approaches, conflict resolution, evidence-based advocacy, conflict analysis, and gender delivered to at least 174 stakeholders
Number and type of stakeholders trained on conflict-sensitive governance, human rights approaches, conflict resolution, evidence-based advocacy and gender.
Output 2.1.1: Up to 4 communities (2 per district) reached with relevant land governance information on rights, laws and policies, benefits of natural resources and proper land use, through print and audio materials.
Number of communities (Villages/parishes) reached with information on land and mineral rights, conflict sensitivity, relevant laws and policies, benefits of natural resources
Output 2.1.3: Up to 15 commercial actors reached with information on conflict dynamics, community needs and priorities
Number of private sector companies who are reached with information on conflict dynamics, community needs and priorities
Output 2.1.2: Up to 6 community awareness and outreach meetings supported to deliver information on land and mineral rights, relevant laws and policies, benefits of natural resources, to conflict dynamics
Number of community awareness and outreach meetings held
Output: 3.1.1. Up to 45 key decision makers participate in talking circles on natural resource governance.
Number of key decision makers who participate in talking circles on natural resource governance
GB-CHC-1043843-UNPBF-Kyrgyzstan_K005
Saferworld
Strengthening capacity of young women and men in Kyrgyzstan to promote peace and security
The project will facilitate safe dialogue spaces for young women and young men in Kyrgyzstan to collectively identify and and articulate their peace and security concerns, empower youth to advocate for action and accountability from their authorities, and create opportunities for meaningful youth participation in decision-making processes around peace and security. The project will pilot an innovative WhatsApp peacebuilding course, launch youth-led community peace initiatives and advocacy campaigns, and facilitate the first-ever youth-led report in Kyrgyzstan on youth perceptions of the Government’s progress on the commitments made to the Agenda 2030 global goals related to youth, gender, peace and security. This unique project will amplify the voices of youth and promote inclusive processes in a context where youth have been largely excluded from local, sub-national, and national-level decision-making.
Saferworld
536013
98231
Saferworld
79876
Saferworld
35450
Saferworld
108280
Saferworld
84355
Saferworld
187604
United Nations Peacebuilding Fund
Saferworld
187604
United Nations Peacebuilding Fund
Saferworld
Output 2.1: YLs have increased understanding of peace and security issues, democracy, inclusion, conflict and gender sensitivity, methodologies to develop community peace initiatives and on skills to connect youth and to advocate with authorities on these issues
Number and percentage of trained YLs who report having increased knowledge of peace, security, democracy, inclusion, conflict and gender sensitivity, methodologies to develop community peace initiatives and skills to connect youth and to advocate with authorities on these issues
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
Target: 90 / 90% (out of 100, at least 50% young women, and at least 30% of youth aged 14-17)
By end Oct 2019 In total 47 (26f/21m) youth leaders have been trained, however they have not been surveyed yet.
Output 3.1 : 30 Local Self-Governance (LSG) representatives in 10 communities (3 per community) participate in a training on the national and international youth policy frameworks, peace and security issues affecting young people and the mechanisms for involving young people in related dialogue and decision-making processes
Number and percentage of trained LSG representatives who report having increased knowledge of peace and security issues affecting young people and skills to involve them in dialogue and decision-making processes
Disaggregated by: location, gender and type of participant (local, sub-national, national level authority)
Target: 27 / 90% (out of 30 participants)
By end Oct 2019 42 local self-governance representatives have been trained, however they have not been surveyed yet.
Output 3.3 : LSG representatives in 10 communities developed funding requests and encouraged their respective local authorities to fund youth initiatives (at least one per community) responding to young women and men’s concerns and needs.
Number of funding requests submitted to local government by trained LSG representatives for youth-inclusive peace and security initiatives.
By end Oct 2019 This indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
Output 1.1: Youth (age 14-25) have improved their understanding of peace and security issues, and increased their connections with each other
Number and percentage of youth participants (age 14-25) from 10 communities report having increased knowledge and skills on peace and security issues as a result of the training provided through the project
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender, age and training topic
By end Oct 2019 723 out of 861 (84%) 270 youth participants (aged 14-17) from the northern camps have not been surveyed yet.
Number and percentage of WhatsApp course participants who network across geographic and other divides
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
By end Oct 2019 To date 70 participants have signed up to participate in the WhatsApp peacebuilding course. This course will begin in November 2019, thus this indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
Outcome 1: Young women and men from different geographic, ethnic, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds are empowered within their communities, and pro-actively and collectively contribute to peace-building solutions addressing youth concerns at local, sub-national, and national levels
Number and percentage of young women and men who feel that access to training, safe spaces and engagement with peers enabled them to collectively articulate their peace and security needs and priorities
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
By end Oct 2019. 674 out of 861 (78%). 270 youth participants (aged 14-17) from the northern camps have not been surveyed yet. In total 1,131 youth have been trained so far, of which 708 were women (63%) and 921 (81%) were youth aged 14-17
Number and type of youth security issues addressed at community level (e.g., solutions derived from community talks)
Disaggregated by: location/community, type of security issue
By end Oct 2019 10 security issues have been identified during this reporting period. Initiatives/advocacy plans to address these issues will be developed in November, 2019 An additional 4 security issues will be identified as part of the WhatsApp course, which will be implemented from November – December 2019
Number and percentage of youth participants who feel that their peace and security concerns and needs are reflected in the SDG16+ progress report
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
By end Oct 2019 To date 38 youth leaders participated in a SDG16+ training workshop. These youth leaders will then lead focus group discussions with youth from the wider community Data collection is planned for November -December 2019 and the report will be produced in January 2020
Output 1.2: Youth (age 14-25) engage with other youth to identify and address peace and security issues affecting them at community and national policy levels
Number and percentage of youth participants who feel able to discuss sensitive peace and security related issues with their peers (including peers within the community and from other communities) and with wider communities
Be end Oct 2019 674 out of 861 (78%). 270 youth participants (aged 14-17) from the northern camps have not been surveyed yet.
Number of peer learning and/or peacebuilding activities led by WhatsApp course graduates
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities have not begun yet. This indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
Outcome 2: Youth Leaders (YLs) (comprising 80 IG members and 20 semi-formal Youth Committee representatives) facilitate inclusive peacebuilding processes at local, sub-national and national levels, advocate for youth peace and security needs to be addressed by authorities, and ensure meaningful participation of youth in relevant policy processes
Number and percentage of all trained youth participants (at least 50% young women) who reported their identified peace and security concerns have been successfully addressed at community and sub-national levels
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
1024 / 80% (out of 1280 youth participants, at least 50% young women, and at least 60% of youth aged 14-17)
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities have not begun yet. This indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
Number and percentage of YLs who report that local, sub-national and/or national level authorities have invited/engaged them in decision-making processes
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
60 / 60% (out of 100 YLs with at least 50% young women, and at least 30% of youth aged 14-17)
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities have not begun yet. This indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
Number and percentage of YLs who report local, sub-national and national national-level authorities have been responsive to their advocacy messaging, specifically with regards to recommendations for the SDG16+ progress report on Kyrgyzstan’s commitments to peace, security, gender, and inclusion
Disaggregated by: location/community, gender and age
Target: 60 / 60% (out of 100 YLs with at least 50% young women, and at least 30% of youth aged 14-17)
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities have not begun yet. This indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
Output 2.2: YLs collectively address the identified peace and security needs through community peace initiatives and advocacy campaigns
Number and quality of community talks, community peace initiatives and advocacy campaigns developed and implemented
10 community talks
By end Oct 2019 To date, community talks have been held in 10 locations and were attended by 471 people (263f/208m). Peace initiatives/advocacy campaigns to address these community security issues will be developed in November, 2019
10 community peace initiatives
By end Oct 2019 To date, community talks have been held in 10 locations and were attended by 471 people (263f/208m). Peace initiatives/advocacy campaigns to address these community security issues will be developed in November, 2019
14 advocacy campaigns (10 at community and 4 at sub-national level)
By end Oct 2019 To date, community talks have been held in 10 locations and were attended by 471 people (263f/208m). Peace initiatives/advocacy campaigns to address these community security issues will be developed in November, 2019
Output 2.3: 30 selected YLs facilitated action-oriented research on progress towards SDG16+ aimed at policy change and use findings for national- and international-level advocacy
Number and percentage of trained youth participants (with at least 50% young women) who contributed to the SDG16+ progress report
Baseline: 0 Target: 1024/ 80% (out of 1280 youth, age 14-25, with at least 50% young women, and at least 60% of youth aged 14-17)
By end Oct 2019 Data collection is planned for November 2019 and thus this indicator will be updated during the next reporting period. The report will be produced in January 2020 To date, 38 youth leaders (22 women) have been trained in SDGs, SDG16+ progress report methodology
Number and percentage of authority representatives who provide positive feedback on the SDG16+ progress report verbally, publicly or through social media
Target: 10 local-level authority representatives
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities will begin in January 2020, thus this indicator will be updated again during the next reporting period
4 sub-national level authority representatives
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities will begin in January 2020, thus this indicator will be updated again during the next reporting period
3 national-level authorities
By end Oct 2019 Relevant activities will begin in January 2020, thus this indicator will be updated again during the next reporting period
Outcome 3: Local and national authorities recognise young women and young men as key actors, participate in youth-led activities, include them in dialogue and decision-making processes around peace and security, and take steps, including through the provision of funding, to address their specific concerns and needs
Outcome indicator 3.1: Number and percentage of trained local, sub-national and national authority representatives who understand that young women and men have specific peace and security concerns and needs and recognise them as key actors in peacebuilding solutions
Disaggregated by: location, gender and type of participant (local, sub-national, national level authority)
Target: 21 / 70% (out of 30 participants)
By end Oct 2019 42 local self-governance representatives have been trained, however they have not been surveyed yet.
Outcome Indicator 3.2: Number and description of local, sub-national and national authority representatives who attended the youth-led initiatives
50 local-level authority representatives
By end Oct 2019 Youth-led initiatives will begin in November 2019, thus this indicator will be updated again during the next reporting period
20 sub-national level authority representatives
5 national-level authorities
By end Oct 2019 Youth-led initiatives will begin in November 2019, thus this indicator will be updated again during the next reporting period
Outcome indicator 3.3: Number and percentage of trained local, sub-national and national authority representatives who involve youth in decision-making processes
Disaggregated by: location, gender and type of participant (local, sub-national, national level authority)
Target: 6 / 20% (out of 30
By end Oct 2019 Youth-led initiatives will begin in November 2019, thus this indicator will be updated again during the next reporting period
Output 3.2 : LSG representatives in 10 communities organised events (at least one per community) to dialogue with youth on issues related to their peace and security concerns and needs
Number of inclusive dialogue initiatives organised and facilitated by trained authority representatives.
By end Oct 2019 This indicator will be updated during the next reporting period.
GB-CHC-1043843-USIP_TJ_V005
Saferworld
Promoting community policing approaches to address the root causes of support for violence and participation in violent groups in C5 countries.
The overall goal of this project is to promote community policing approaches in the C5 countries (namely Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Kazakstan and Turkmenistan) in order to address the root causes of support for violence and participation in violent groups. Activities undertaken by this project will include organizing regional conferences and training on community policing and community security for selected representatives of law enforcement agencies (LEAs) and civil society organizations (CSOs) from the C5 countries, and providing technical support and small grants for piloting community policing activities. The products of this project will include a conference report outlining key findings and next steps from the initial conference, and a workshop report summarizing best practices, lessons learned, and recommendations for future programming. Through this project, United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and Saferworld have the unique opportunity to share Saferworld’s community policing program approaches, experience, and lessons learned with different actors (authorities, civil society, communities, and external actors) across the C5 region. The total anticipated budget, including all other sources of funding for the project for this project is $199,405.36.
United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843
199405
199405
196756
Saferworld
64802
United States Institute of Peace
Saferworld
64802
United States Institute of Peace
67153
United States Institute of Peace
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-TJPAS_V006
Saferworld
Citizen Narrative Campaign
The proposed project includes building relationships with communities, through conducting community security assessments to understand community’s primary concerns and fears of violence, and engaging in dialogues with them about their concerns about violent groups and people joining them. These initiatives will include conducting outreach and awareness raising campaigns regarding the harmful impact of violent groups and the positive role youth play in driving peace.
Overall goal: 1) Increase understanding of the underlying drivers of insecurity and violence, including those that contribute to recruitment into or support for violent groups; 2) address these causes through cross-sectoral working groups ; and conduct outreach and strategic messaging campaigns, dialogue, and lesson learning with the aim of changing attitudes and behaviours of target audiences.
federal assitance Awards
Saferworld
Saferworld
Ferdinand Nikola
Country Director Tajikistan
fnikolla@saferworld.org.uk
249816
284816
44087
Saferworld
69824
Saferworld
145302
US State Department
Saferworld
33432
Saferworld
55930
US State Department
39873
Saferworld
14134
Saferworld
70119
US State Department
Saferworld
88447
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_U004/U007
Saferworld
Community Policing Sustainment Tajikistan
The project provides comprehensive assessments, capacity-building, training development, coordination, and delivery, mentoring, logistical support, event planning, and related services throughout Tajikistan in support of community security in areas such as community policing education, domestic violence response, gender equity, human rights, and radicalisation and violent extremism prevention programs
US Department of State
Saferworld
Community Policing program
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Tajikistan
889823
1214160.33
3297990.52
1214160.33
US Department of State
Saferworld
889823
US Department of State
Saferworld
3297990.52
US Department of State
Saferworld
274762.5
Saferworld
337675.19
Saferworld
649733.12
US State Department
Saferworld
839250
US State Department
Saferworld
447845.14
Saferworld
245403
Saferworld
47951
US Department of State
Saferworld
479093
US Department of State
Saferworld
51921
US Department of State
Saferworld
351542
US Department of State
Saferworld
116872
Saferworld
11237
Saferworld
282032.89
Saferworld
11237
US Department of State
Saferworld
47950
Saferworld
193763
Saferworld
105983
Saferworld
182286
Saferworld
413652
US Department of State
Saferworld
236219
Saferworld
377727
US Department of States
Saferworld
370861
US State Department
Saferworld
539020
Saferworld
504382
US State Department
Saferworld
234108
Saferworld
391238
Saferworld
221556
US Department of State
Saferworld
Outcome 3: Public Councils (PCs), Community Policing Partnership Teams (CPPTs), and civil society actors individually and collectively plan, facilitate and implement community policing/security initiatives in collaboration with other actors (including local authorities (hukumat/district and jamoat/local government) and police, and advocate on behalf of communities for transparent and accountable policies, practices, and services that contribute to police reform and community security at all levels.
CSOs level of knowledge on 1-5 scalar rating in pre-identified technical areas (e.g. communication, awareness raising, facilitation, dialogue and advocacy.
Disaggregate by: organisation, location
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 -Participants of the training noted 4.6 as average score
Number of collaborative and joint action and advocacy taken by civil society actors at the sub-national and national levels, on behalf of their communities, on community policing and security issues.
Disaggregate by: location
2 briefing papers jointly produced
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - CSP members produced 6 briefing papers
4 meetings with authorities at national level held
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 5 joint meetings with sub-national and local level authorities
Op 3.2 CSP members trained
Number of training
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 6 days (4 times 1.5 days) trainings with participation of 32 CSP members (15 male, and 17 female participants)
By end quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 6 days (4 times 1.5 days) trainings with participation of 32 CSP members (15 male, and 17 female participants)
Op 2.5 Criminal statistics data base computer system is purchased and installed and handed over to the MIA
Number of MIA computer system
The contract for developing the computer system was signed in April 2020 and implementation of the contract is underway
Op 2.6 Toolkit produced and disseminated with police and community members at oblast level
Number and quality of toolkits produced
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 toolkit produced with 3000 copies in Tajik language. Toolkit includes modules on Domestic Violence prevention, and prevention of People Joining Violent Groups and Community Policing (as identified in the needs assessment).
Number of dissemination workshops
14 (2 workshops x 7 regions)
BY quarter ending 31/03/2020
Number of strategies developed
By quarter ending 31/03/2020
Number of people who attend workshops
By quarter ending 31/03/2020
Op 3.3 CSP organise/lead dialogue meetings with communities; produce briefings/papers; and hold meetings with authorities
Number of dialogue meetings led by CSP
By end quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 70 dialogue meetings, 6 papers produced, and 5 meetings held
Number of paper produced by CSP
By end quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 70 dialogue meetings, 6 papers produced, and 5 meetings held
Number of meetings held with authorities
at least 4
By end quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 70 dialogue meetings, 6 papers produced, and 5 meetings held
Op 1.2 CPPTs established in new locations
Number of CPPTs established
disaggregated by gender
Op 2.1 Work plans produced and agreed with MIA officials and coordination meetings organized
Number of work plans produced and agreed
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 2 annual work plans agreed and approved
Number of coordination meetings
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 4 National Level coordination meetings held , 11 district and sub-national level coordination meetings held
Op 2.3 Plan/recommendations developed outlining how the toolkit will be utilized and distributed among MIA officials and police officers.
Number of plans/recommendations
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 plan in progress
Op 3.4 Regional workshop conducted and workshop summary report with key findings and recommendations shared
Number of workshops
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 regional workshop conducted with participation of 58 people
Number of participants
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 regional workshop conducted with participation of 58 people
Op 3.5 Regional workshop conducted and workshop summary report with key findings and recommendations shared
Number of experience sharing visits
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 regional experience sharing event conducted with participation of 91 people, and 1 workshop on CP conducted with participation of 21 people
Number of workshops
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 regional experience sharing event conducted with participation of 91 people, and 1 workshop on CP conducted with participation of 21 people
Outcome 4: Donors (including INL), INGOs, and multi-lateral organizations (e.g. OSCE, the United National Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)) are aware of community-centered policing initiatives undertaken by national, sub-national, and local authorities, civil society, and communities; informed about community security priorities, and respond to those priorities through conflict- and gender-sensitive aid strategies and programs.
Number/description of external actors who take up Saferworld (and partners') recommendations on conflict-sensitive practice in conflict-affected states
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 2 external actors (UNDP and OSCE) take up Saferworld's conflict and gender sensitivity approaches and were eager to cooperate and coordinate joint activities
Op 3.6 Annual conference conducted and conference summary produced
Number of conferences
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 event conducted with participation of 400 people
Number of participants
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 event conducted with participation of 400 people
Op 1.4 Action plans developed and implemented - some with a clear focus on addressing issues along the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border
Number of action plans implemented (including with small grants)
30 (10 to new CPPTs; 20 to existing CPPTs)
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 42 action plans were completed
Op 2.2 Community Policing Toolkit produced by the MIA Academy
Number of toolkits produced
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 toolkit was produced and agreed with the MIA Academy
Op 2.4 Training needs assessment for MIA's National Police Coordinator and relevant Heads of Department of DIA completed and representatives trained
Number of needs assessments
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 Needs assessment report developed
Number of trainings/workshops
By quarter ending 31/03/2020
Number of participants trained
By quarter ending 31/03/2020
Op 4.1 Report produced with profiles of PCs, CPPTs and CPCs for INL
Number of profiles
1 overall report
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 report produced and shared
Op 4.2 Regular meetings held with INL and other relevant stakeholders, e.g. OSCE, UNODC
Number of meetings with INL and other external actors
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 7 meetings held to discuss police reform and Community Policing
Op 4.3 Report produced on the initiatives and achievements of the MIA (to share with INL and other relevant actors)
Number of reports/briefings
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 1 report on MIA achievements was produced and shared with INL
Op 1.1 CSAs completed & (new) project locations identified
Number of CSA reports; and project sites
Achieved by quarter ending 30/09/2019
Op 1.3 CPPTs trained in new locations
Number of trainings/workshops for CPPTs
By quarter ending 31/03/2020
Number of CPPT members trained (disaggregated by gender)
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 11 trainings on Community Policing and CSA for 242 participants (172 male, and 70 female).
Outcome 1: Selected communities are actively involved in identifying, analyzing, prioritizing and addressing key drivers of conflict and insecurity, including the root causes of support for violence and/or recruitment into violent groups, and support the work of new CPPTs in the Tajikistan-Afghanistan border areas.
Representation of community members/civil society in CPPTs (i.e. composition of CPPTs)
Disaggregated by: gender; location
70% community/civil soceity represenatavion with at least 40% women
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 59% community/civil society representation and 27% women
Level of input from community members in the development and implementation of action plans led by CPPTs.
Disaggregated by: location; gender
At least 80% of CPPTs plans receive input from community members.
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 90% of CPPT plans received input from community members
Outcome 2: Local, sub-national, and national level authorities, including police, consult with communities on security issues, incorporate community concerns into their related responses, and operate to standards that are transparent, inclusive, and legitimate.
Number of action plans produced and/or initiatives implemented (including through seed grants) by CPPTs which respond to concerns raised through community consultations.
Disaggregated by: location; gender (i.e. issues affecting women and children)
By quarter ending 31/13/2020 - 42 community-led initiatives have been implemented that address community problem. By locations: Khatlon: 15 APs GBAO: 8 APs Soghd: 7 APs Rasht: 5 APs RRS: 7 APs By Gender: Avg. 35% address issues affecting women; Avg.33% address issues affecting children and youth Avg. 32% other issues (i.e. trust between authorities, education and etc.)
% of PC/CPPT members at oblast level who feel that authorities are more responsive to community security concerns/needs
Disaggregated by: location; gender
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 82% CPPTs and PCs members were happy with performance of local authorities, 79% of them noted positive changes in behaviour of local authorities, and 73% feel that authorities are more responsive to community security concerns
Number of actions/changes in practice taken forward by MIA officials as agreed in work plans or through project recommendations.
Disaggregated by: location; type/role of actor
By quarter ending 31/03/2020 - 43 changes in practice, including: 10 changes in practice and behaviours by the National level MIA officials have identified and reported; and 33 systemic changes in practice and behaviour of MIA/DMIA official at sub-national and local level identified and reported
Op 3.1 Civil Society Platform (CSP) established
Number and composition of CSP
Number and composition of CSP
By end quarter 31/03/2020 - 1 CSP established with 63% of female and 37 % male representation
GB-CHC-1043843-UNDP-TJK-K006
Saferworld
Strengthening community security and prevention of violence against women in Tajikistan
The project is designed to contribute to the reduction of domestic violence (DV) against women and girls in three target districts of Tajikistan by: (a) strengthening the identification of, and response to, DV cases (through supporting the coordination and monitoring of police reform processes; bolstering community policing and the capacity of community policing partnership teams (CPPTs); providing conflict and gender sensitivity training to the police, CPPTs and gender-based violence (GBV) service providers; raising awareness on DV and GBV at community levels; and increasing access to GBV services through referral mechanisms) and (b) enabling CPPTs and communities to identify, challenge and address harmful gender norms, behaviours and relationships that perpetuate gender inequality and violence (through participatory conflict and gender analysis (including using Saferworld’s Gender Analysis of Conflict Tookit), gender transformative workshops, and the development and implementation of action plans, resourced through small grants, to challenge, advocate against and address harmful gender norms and behaviours).
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Saferworld
Jahon
Zarshedabonu
Lawyer Association of Pamir
Saferworld
Khirad Kargasov
Tajikistan Country Manager
kkargasov@saferworld.org.uk
287691
110000
United Nations Development Programme
Saferworld
77284
Saferworld
120000
United Nations Development Programme
Saferworld
80880
Saferworld
70844
Saferworld
1.8. Training on community policing facilitated with a focus on GBV in target districts, with emphasis on application of human rights-based approaches (HRBA) and gender equality (GE) for improved interactions with the communities
# of training curricula produced with emphasis an on the application of HRBA and GE
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of 1 three-day workshops on community policing and gender delivered
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of police officers who attend a community policing and gender workshop
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of roll-out plans for training other police officers produced
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 1 roll out plan produced and 90 police officers trainined
1.4. Grassroots CSOs, including women- and youth-led groups and religious leaders supported in initiating and conducting local-level research to generate evidence and data for monitoring and reporting [to the National Council] on the implementation of Police Reform process
# of researched methodologies produced on monitoring of the implementation of the Law On the Prevention of Domestic Violence
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of reports on progress, challenges and recommendations published in Dushanbe and presented to the MIA and the Committee on Women and Family Affairs
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 1 report was published and findings shared
1.7. Small grants provided to CPPTs on gender-focused issues
# of small grants provided to CPPTs
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 3 small grants provided and implementation of action plans completed.
1.6. CPPTs established/strengthened to develop joint action plans and local solutions to community security issues in target districts
# of gender and conflict analysis reports produced that reflect CPPTs and community members’ gender norms, behaviours and relationships
By quarter ending 31/08/2019 - 3 gender and conflict analysis reports produced that reflect CPPT and community gender norms.
# of gender transformation workshop modules developed based on the findings of participatory analysis
By quarter ending 31/08/2019 - 1 gender transformative workshop module developed
# of two day workshops on gender transformation delivered
1 two-day workshop on gender transformation delivered to 75 CPPTs members, including women and youth groups in selected districts (20 CPPT members and 5women and youth leaders in each district)
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of one-day workshops on action plan development delivered
1 one-day workshop on action plan development delivered to 75 CPPTs members, women and youth groups in selected districts (20 CPPT members and five women and youth leaders in each district)
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of action plans developed by CPPTs to challenge, advocate against and address harmful gender norms and behaviours that perpetuate gender discrimination, exclusion and violence
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
# of action plans developed by women- and youth-led initiatives to to challenge, advocate against and address harmful gender norms and behaviours that perpetuate gender discrimination, exclusion and violence
By quarter ending 31/11/2019
1.2. Expert support provided to the Multi-Disciplinary Working Groups on Prevention of Domestic Violence to identify more cases of domestic violence
# of CPPT members who participate and share their experiences in national coordination meetings
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 12 CPPTs members participated
# of CSO members who participate and share their experiences in national coordination meetings
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 2 CSOs participated in sub-national coordination meetings
% increase in domestic violence cases addressed to Multi-Disciplinary Working Groups on Prevention of Domestic Violence.
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - To date 74 (5 male, 69 female) cases of domestic violence have been referred to MDWGs. The overall % increase of cases address by the MDWGs will be reported at the end of the project
1.1 Policy dialogues and Public Council meetings facilitated to enhance (a) institutional and (b) inter-ministerial coordination in the framework of the ongoing police reform process and submit minutes of the meetings to UNDP
# of national coordination meetings with MIA held throughout the project timeframe
Target changed from 4 to 2, as it became clear that it would be ineffective to hold more than two national level meetings during the project’s lifetime. UNDP approved change.
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 1 national coordination meeting held with the MIA, 46 (5 female, 41 male) participants attended 2 sub-national coordination meeting in Vahdat and Kulob with 66 (29 female, 37 male) participants
# of meeting agendas and minutes developed and shared with all project participants
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 -1 meeting agenda and minutes developed and shared
1.3. Comprehensive survivor-centered support provided to target districts and meaningful participation of CSOs, local activists, women and youth in support provision strengthened
# of DV survivors who reach out to CPPTs referred
90 individual referrals (30 in each community)
By quarter ending 29/02/2020
# of female DV survivors referred
By quarter ending 29/02/2020
1.3.2. Youth Action Plans with youth focused initiatives developed and endorsed by the district authorities
# of youth action plans developed by youth groups
Y1Q1 - 4 actions plans were developed and agreed with Saferworld and UNDP.
1.3.1. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) facilitated to identify key youth groups and their level of activeness in community life and proposals to ensure proactive and meaningful participation of young men and women in community life
# of youth camp programmes produced and shared with CPPT members and youth
By quarter ending 31/08/2019 - 1 youth camp program was developed and shared
# of gender-balanced youth groups formed
1 per district
By quarter ending 31/8/2019 - 4 gender-balanced youth groups formed (1 per district)
# of youth camps held
1 youth camp held for 30 young people, including 30% women and 4 CPPT leaders
By quarter ending 31/08/2019 - 1 youth camp for 30 young people (11 female, 19 male); 4 CPPT leaders (all male) also participated at the camp
# of activity reports produced that reflect youth p[perspectives on safety and security
Y1Q1 - Report to be produced in the next quarter
# of focus groups discussions (FGD) facilitated with youth
4 during the youth camp and 4 in the selected districts
By quarter ending 31/08/2019 - 4 FGDs conducted by Saferworld and our CSO partners before the youth camp to identify and select potential candidate for participation at the camp. Another 4 FGDs conducted after the camp by camp participants, with participation from Saferworld and CSO partners, to discuss and finalize action plans at the community level
1.3.3. Implementation of youth-focused initiatives supported through the provision of small-scale grants to young men and women/youth groups in line with the Youth Action Plan
# of small grants provided
By quarter ending 31/11/2019 - 4 small grants provided to youth groups for implementation of the action plans in their respective communities
1.5. Small-scale grants provided to women- and youth-led initiatives
# of small grants provided
By quarter ending 29/02/2020 - 3 small grants provided and implementation of 3 action plans completed
GB-CHC-1043843-FCO_H016
Saferworld
Promoting peace and security through the implementation of the Chinese-led Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
To create effective entry points for greater awareness and debates on the peace and security implications of the BRI and thereby contribute to promote stability, advance human security and prevent conflict in countries along the BRI, specifically Central and South Asia.
Saferworld
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
While the contract is up to end of June 2019, however, project implementations ends on 31st December 2018.
Saferworld
Abdoulie Jawo
ajawo@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
24967.80
14542.37
10425.52
10425.52
14542.37
To create effective entry points for greater awareness and debates on the peace and security implications of the BRI and thereby contribute to the promotion of stability, advancing human security and preventing conflict in countries along the BRI, specifically Central and South Asia
A dialogue mechanism is established that puts peace and security issues higher on the policy agenda of implementing the BRI and which will continue beyond the life of this project
Number of countries represented at project dialogues and events
8 by month 7
Number of meetings with officials and civil society experts that discuss the implications of the BRI on stability, human security and conflict issues
3 by month 4
5 by month 7
Number of government officials, think tanks and academics, businesses and civil society actors engaged in discussions on peace and security organised by Saferworld in specific BRI countries and contexts
20 by month 4
30 by month 7
Numbers of statements made by policy influencers, including government officials and semi-official think tanks, expressing that the project has contributed to enhanced higher-level policy dialogues, such as UK-China dialogue on the implementation of the BRI
2 by month 4
6 by month 7
Numbers of statements made by people who, following their involvement in project activities, credit the value of the project in initiating a dialogue on the peace and security implications of the BRI
3 by month 4
6 by month 7
GB-CHC-1043843-MyJusticeMyanmar2018-19-D033
Saferworld
Improving community-based justice in mixed and KNU-controlled areas
To promote good governance, rule of law, and access to effective justice in Karen villages in mixed- and KNU-controlled areas by strengthening KNU justice provision and communities/individuals’ confidence and skills to engage with authorities and justice providers in order to seek resolution for their cases and/or to advocate for improved justice provision.
Saferworld
Saferworld
Theo Hollander
Security and Justice Advisor
thollander@saferworld.org.uk
134069
43723.82
53963
First MJ payment
MyJustice is part of the British council funded by the EC
Saferworld
39779
Second payment
MyJustice is part of the British Council funded by the EC
Saferworld
39931
Third payment
Myjustice is part of the British Council and funded by the EC
Saferworld
26341
Fourth payment
MyJustice is part of the British Council and funded by the EC
Saferworld
17731
Final payment
MyJustice is part of the British council and funded by the EC
Saferworld
12519.89
First report
Saferworld
28666.56
Second report
Saferworld
56372.59
third report
Saferworld
36510.14
Fourth report
Saferworld
43675.85
Final report
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-DFATD_E011
Saferworld
Tackling the illicit trade in proliferation-sensitive goods and technologies
This project aims to promote cooperation, information sharing and concrete action among industry experts and government officials in China to increase awareness of new and emerging approaches to addressing illicit trade and diversion of proliferation sensitive technologies, and deepen the level of East-West cooperation on strategic trade control and compliance issues among major producers of proliferation-sensitive goods and technologies.
Saferworld
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Saferworld
Bernardo Mariani
Head of China
bmariani@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
750000
750000
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Saferworld
Outcome 3: Agreement will be reached among international experts on constructive approaches to key export control challenges such as intangible technology transfer, catch-all controls and commodity listing and classification methodologies, with an emphasis on best international practice.
a) The substance and outcomes of the discussions on export control challenges are raised in the debates within relevant external fora
1 = achieved
b) A briefing is produced that can feed into the development of new national norms and regulations
Outcome 4: Government and industry experts agree on the different types of risk that exist in relation to the export of proliferation-sensitive goods and technologies and on a range of tools and strategies for identifying and responding to such risks.
a) A briefing is produced in co-operation with government and industry experts that sets out a number of different context-specific approaches and tools that may be used to identify, quantify and address such risks including red flag indicators and ‘big-data’ analytics.
b) The substance and outcomes of the discussions on export control risks are referred to in the debates within relevant external fora
1 = Acheived
Outcome 1: Government and industry experts support and contribute to the development of a comprehensive multi-faceted strategy for government-industry outreach on export control compliance and for industry approaches to ICP.
a) Toolkit is produced illustrating a range of government-industry outreach strategies and a variety of industry strategies to build a culture of compliance through ICP
b) Government and industry representatives express interest in using the toolkit in the respective development/modification of their industry outreach programs or ICP.
1 = achieved
Outcome 2: Enhanced interest in and capacity for outreach to industry among Chinese authorities in the national and in a provincial context together with increased levels of understanding of the need for ICP among Chinese SMEs and of how to develop and implement appropriate programs that meet their specific situation and requirements.
a) Representatives from national and provincial governments and from SMEs and larger enterprises attend relevant meetings, bilateral discussions and workshops on government outreach and industry compliance.
1 = Achieved
b) Government and industry representatives respond positively to the toolkit and indicate that it will help shape their future thinking on outreach and ICP respectively
1 = Acheived
Output 2: 20 members of the expert working group (EWG) attended a workshop in Vienna to discuss the content and development of the draft toolkit for government-industry outreach and ICP and the key topics for reaching out effectively to SMEs from a compliance perspective.
Number of attendees at the expert working group meeting
Output 1: A report on China's strategic trade controls system is produced.
This report will be based on the EXBS system assessment framework and will establish a baseline against which to measure project progress and track the development of China’s strategic trade control system – including references to industry outreach and ICP requirements – over time.
Number of reports produced on China's strategic trade controls system
1 report will be produced
Output 3: A strategic trade control study visit, which includes an experience-sharing workshop is carried out. Approximately 20 participants, including members of the EWG, policy experts and practitioners, as well as industry communities, attend the event.
Number of participants attending the experience-sharing workshop
20 participants will attend the workshop
Output 4: A workshop focusing on ‘Commercial compliance and government outreach to SMEs’ in Beijing coordinated by Saferworld in cooperation with CAITEC.
Number of workshops carried out
1 workshop
Output 5: Saferworld and CPR/UAlbany, in cooperation with CAITEC, organize a workshop in one province of China; the twin concepts of government outreach and industry compliance are discussed. Approximately 40 participants, including the members of the EWG, Chinese officials and practitioners as well as industry representatives at provincial level attend the event.
Number of participants at the industry outreach workshop
Output 6: Approximately 20 participants from the EWG attend the Wassenaar Arrangment General Working Group (GWG) event in Vienna.
Number of attendees at the GWG event
20 EWG participants attend the GWG
Output 7: A toolkit is produced that promotes industry awareness of, and compliance with, export control.s
Number of toolkits produced
1 toolkit is produced
Output 8: Project implementers and US officials attend a management meeting hosted by Saferworld
Number of management meetings hosted by Saferworld
1 meeting held in the first year
1 meeting held in the second year (2 in total)
GB-CHC-1043843-FC0_B025
Saferworld
Tackling the illicit transfer and diversion of proliferation-sensitive goods and technologies: supporting government outreach and encouraging a culture of compliance among industry
To enhance capacities of countries in Asia, including member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), to prevent the illicit trade and diversion of WMD-related materials and conventional arms.
Saferworld
UK - Foreign & Commonwealth Office
126736.50
: To enhance capacities by countries in Asia, including China and member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), to prevent the illicit trade and diversion of WMD-related materials and conventional arms.
Numbers of Chinese officials (drawn from agencies including the Chinese Ministry of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry Security, Import and Export Control, the General Administration of Customs (GAC) and the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense (SASTIND) who engage in more knowledgeable, open and constructive dialogue on capacity-building activities on government-industry outreach and on effective industry ICP with the use of Saferworld’s manual Strategic trade control outreach and industry compliance: tools and resources (STC) and its accompanying training pack.
Increased constructive dialogue and interactions among experts from Asia (especially China and ASEAN Countries), Europe and the U.S. on practical action to improve government-industry outreach and the promotion of effective industry ICP
Numbers of senior practitioners and policy experts from China and ASEAN participating states who are involved in discussions on how efforts to improve government-industry outreach and the promotion of effective industry ICP can be strengthened.
GB-CHC-1043843-DfidBD_A016
Saferworld
Women's Empowerment and Social Cohesion in Cox's Bazar
This proposal outlines a holistic intervention to address intra- and inter-communal conflict dynamics within and between the Rohingya refugee communities and host communities in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. It does so in a manner which is intended to contribute to women’s safety and empowerment, by increasing women’s access to services within the camps as well as harnessing the potential of peer-to-peer support within and outside the camps.
Saferworld
Saferworld
Saferworld
Asia Programme Team
Ashlea Brewer
Asia Grants Manager
abrewer@saferworld.org.uk
464628
520489
200000
232326
First payment
UK Department for International Development
Saferworld
464143
Saferworld
232302
Second payment
UK Department for International Development
Saferworld
255861
CE payment
UK Department for International Development
Saferworld
GB-CHC-1043843-CSSF-MM_C007
Saferworld
Strengthening Community Security and Security Sector Reform/Governance in Myanmar
The project will contribute to a reduction in violence and insecurity at the local and sub-national levels in Myanmar, while also contributing to the transformation of the way security is understood, delivered and experienced in order to improve people’s safety, security and well-being. This three-year project will begin by consolidating Saferworld's experience and lessons learnt from the last three years of programming and deepening our engagement in Karen and Mon areas of south east Myanmar, during year one of the project. We will then extend the programme into Shan and Kachin states in years two and three of the project.
UK - Department for International Development (DFID)
Saferworld
663663
334738
173959
first payment
UK gov - CSSF
Saferworld
135761
Second payment
UK gov - CSSF
Saferworld
160281
Third payment
UK gov - CSSF
Saferworld
309571
fourth payment
UK gov - CSSF
Saferworld
218829
Fifth payment
UK gov - CSSF
Saferworld
169663
First report
Saferworld
126784
second report
Saferworld
206336
Third report
Saferworld
197142
Fourth report
Saferworld
Output 3.1 Authorities/security actors are informed about community security approaches and provide assistance to and/or jointly implement community security action plans that address community insecurities, including the needs of groups that are regularly excluded from decision-making
Number of action plans supported by authorities/security actors Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state)
Number of action plans supported by authorities/security actors Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of action plans authorities /security actors support to address gender causes of insecurity
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of joint action plans created between CSWGs and township level authorities/security actors
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Overall Goal: Communities, civil society and authorities/security actors to create more peaceful and secure societies s, by jointly reshaping security provision so that it is more responsive, inclusive and accountable, based on the needs of all of Myanmar’s diverse communities.
Percentage of project stakeholders who report increased trust and cooperation between communities, civil society and authorities
Disaggregated by: location, gender, diversity of project actor categories
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Percentage of individuals/community members (including women, youth, elderly and other marginalised groups) who report that security and governance service providers are more responsive to community needs (including issues affecting marginalised groups)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Outcome 1: Selected Communities in project areas improve their capacity to identify and work together with authorities to address complex community security issues
Percentage of CSWG members (including women, men, youth, elderly, people with disabilities, and other groups that are regularly excluded) who report that action plans reflect and effectively address their needs
Disaggregated by: location, diversity of CSWG members (e.g.: gender, youth, elderly, ethnicity, religion)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Percentage of CSWG members (including women, youth, elderly and other marginalised groups) who have taken concrete steps to address complex community security issues as a follow-on/beyond the action plans
Disaggregated by: location, diversity of CSWG members (e.g.: gender, youth, elderly, ethnicity, religion)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Percentage of CSWGs members who report that authorities were receptive to their advocacy messages and recommendations and took steps to address complex community security issues
Disaggregated by: location, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Output 2.1 CSO partners, including gender equality CSOs, are trained and supported to lead the implementation of the community security approach and activities in specific project areas.
Number of trainings on community security approach conducted (including conflict and gender analysis, facilitation, community mobilisation, action planning, and MEL etc.)
Disaggregated by: location, type and length of trainings, type of CSO (gender or youth focus etc.)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Percentage of trained CSO partners who report increased knowledge and skills on community security, community policing and SSR/G
Disaggregated by: location, type of CSO (gender or youth focus etc.)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Output 1.1 Community Security Working Groups (CSWGs) are formed and are supported to develop and implement action plans, in which they increasingly collaborate with authorities/security actors to resolve community security issues in a conflict- and gender-sensitive way
Number of CSWGs established at village level
Disaggregated by: location, diversity of CSWG members (e.g.: gender, youth, elderly, ethnicity, religion)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of action plans developed and implemented at the village level in cooperation with authorities at different levels
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of trainings held by partner CSOs with CSWGs
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of community security issues in which gender causes/dynamics of insecurity are identified
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of action plans that address gender dynamics of insecurity
Year 1 project progress - 31st December 2019
Output 2.1 Township-level Community Security Working Groups (CSWGs) are formed and supported to increasingly collaborate with authorities, including security and justice actors, to address community security and justice concerns in a conflict- and gender sensitive way.
Number of CSWGs township level committee established
Disaggregated by: location, diversity of CSWG members (e.g.: gender, youth, elderly, ethnicity, religion)
Year 1 project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of action plans developed and implemented at the township level which address complex community security issues
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of visits organised to sub-national offices including parliament, government, and EAO offices or offices of political parties organised for CSWGs where they advocate for their needs
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 project progress - 31st December 2019
Outcome 2: Civil society partners work with communities and authorities/security actors to address community security issues, whilst advocating for more inclusive, accountable and responsive security sector governance
Number of CSO partners that work on addressing gender inequality in community security and SSR/G
Disaggregated by: Number of CSO partners that work on addressing gender inequality in community security and SSR/G
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of CSOs partners who increasingly lead community security activities independently of Saferworld (including conflict and gender analysis, community facilitation, and action planning) and advocate for more inclusive and responsive security sector governance
Disaggregated by: location, type of activity (community security, SSR, SSG)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Output 2.2 CSO and network partners, including women-led and gender equality organisations and networks, are trained and supported to advocate for SSR/G that is more inclusive, accountable and responsive to the needs and experiences of communities
Number of CSO partners who participate in exposure trip to another conflict-affected country to learn about community security, community policing, and SSR/G
Disaggregated by: location, type of CSO (gender or youth focus etc.)
Number of trainings/courses on SSR/G conducted
Disaggregated by: location, type and length of training, type of CSO (gender or youth focus etc.)
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perception report on community security and security sector governance issues in Shan state produced in partnership with CSOs
Number of SSR/G publications produced in partnership with CSOs to support stakeholders in security sector negotiations
Disaggregated by: type of issue, type of publication
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of SSR/G publications disseminated to support stakeholders in security sector negotiations
Disaggregated by: type of recipient
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of events attended by civil society partners in which they advocate for more inclusive accountable and responsive security sector governance
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Outcome 3: Authorities/security actors demonstrate increased responsiveness and accountability to community security concerns, and have more effective policies, strategies, mechanisms and practices for security provision
Percentage of authority/security actors with whom we have consistently engaged report increased motivation to consult with CSWGs/communities in their decision-making processes
Disaggregated by: location, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of changes in policies, practices, and/or structure to make security sector governance more responsive and accountable to and inclusive of communities
Disaggregated by: location, type of issue, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Output 3.2 Authorities/security actors receive technical assistance on security sector governance/reform to make their policies, strategies and mechanisms for security provision more inclusive, accountable and responsive to community needs, including the needs of groups that are regularly excluded from decision-making
Number of trainings on community security and SSR/G conducted
Disaggregated by: location, type and length of training
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of authorities/security actors who participate in trainings
Disaggregated by: location, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of authorities/security actors who participate in exposure trip to another conflict-affected country organised for authorities to learn about community security, community policing, and SSR/G
Disaggregated by: location, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Percentage of trained authorities/security actors who report increased knowledge and skills on community security, gender, community policing and SSR/G
Disaggregated by: location, type of authority (state and non-state), gender, position/level of authority
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Outcome 4: International aid actors that are engaged in security and governance programmes have improved mechanisms for coordination with each other, improved cooperation with CSOs and CSO networks, and integrate community-level peace and security priorities into their policies, practices and intervention strategies
Number of requests by international actors to Saferworld and partners for input into their policies, practices and strategies on community security approaches and SSR/G
Disaggregated by: type of issue, type of international actor
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of international actors who take up community security approaches and/or concerns in their policies, practices and interventions in conflict affected areas or in their support to SSR/G
Disaggregated by: type of issue, type of international actor
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Output 4.1 International aid actors engaged in security and governance coordinate with and learn from Saferworld and CSOs recommendations on community security and SSR/G context
Number of briefings and learning events held for international actors in which CSOs participate
Number of briefings and learning events held for international actors in which CSOs participate
Disaggregated by: type of issue, type of participants
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of policy briefs or newsletters produced and disseminated (examining key themes, lessons and case studies emerging from the project, and implications for external actors)
Disaggregated by: type of issue, type of recipient
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of monthly update briefings on community security context in project locations and SSR/G developments held for HMG
Disaggregated by: type of issue
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
Number of bi-annual security and justice coordination meetings hosted in which CSOs and security actors participate
Disaggregated by: type of issue, type of participants
Year 1 Project progress - 31st December 2019
GB-CHC-1043843-FinlandEmbassyKenya_F018
Saferworld
Promoting Collective Action in Electoral Early Warning and Response (PCA-EWER)
The overall goal of the project is to reduce the potential for violence before, during and after the 2017 general elections through empowering state and non-state actors at national, county and community levels to respond effectively to the causes and incidences of violence.
Embassy of Finland, Kenya
Saferworld
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
100000
5990
Saferworld
100000
Embassy of Finland, Kenya
Saferworld
Outcome 1: Key election stakeholders (including communities, politicians and aspirants, youth, women and security providers, local officials) promote positive, non-violent engagement across socio-political lines.
1a) Presence of people across divides of ethnicity (Luya, Saboat, Marakwet), and political position present at dialogues
By M12, dialogues include representatives from all ethnicities in each target county
1b) Number of women and youth present at dialogues
Few key state and non state election stakeholders have initiatives that are geared at reducing polarisation along ethnic, political, age and gender lines on matters related to the 2017 elections.
At least 40% participation by women and youth in dialogues
1c) Number of commitments to share information on an ongoing basis between boda boda associations and police/other conflicting groups
Each dialogue yields at least one commitment to share information on an ongoing basis by participant groups
Output 2.1: A series of training workshops are delivered for Sub-County Peace Committee and Peace Mediators in order to effectively prevent and respond to electoral violence
a) Number of Sub-County Peace Committee training workshops
Two training workshops for Sub-County Peace Committees
b) Number of Peace Mediators trained
A total of 60 Peace Mediators trained, with 30 per target county
c) Ethnic breakdown of trainees
At least 75% of ethnic groups in the target counties participate in training
Output 2.2: Multi-stakeholder spaces are created for analysis, planning and learning among peace actors focused on electoral violence in Kenya
a) Number of coordination and consultation forums among EWER platforms
14 coordination and consultation forums, with seven in each target county
b) Number of meetings between EWER platforms and community stakeholders
Four meetings between EWER platforms and community stakeholders, with two in each target county
c) Number of participants at learning and reflection roundtable
Up to 23 participants at the learning and reflection roundtable
d) Role and seniority of participants at learning and reflection roundtable
Participation from at least four major donor agencies, four active INGOs, and three participants from target counties
Overall Goal: Reduced potential for violence before, during and after the 2017 general elections through empowering state and non-state actors at national, county and community levels to respond effectively to the causes and incidences of violence.
Percentage of reported incidents of tensions and violence to which supported EWER platforms and Peace Mediators respond
The frequency of violent incidents is on the rise, as witnessed during past electoral activities such as vote registration and political meetings/gatherings in parts of the country. There is likelihood of more widespread incidents as the election date approaches.
Outcome 2: Actors within formal EWER architecture and informal peacebuilding structures are communicating, coordinating their activities and undertaking joint actions in the target counties to prevent those historically vulnerable from participating in electoral violence (including youth, women, matatu and boda boda associations).
2a) Number of conflicts mediated by trained mediators
Trained mediators are able to respond to at least 40% of conflicts highlighted to them
2b) Number of cases acted on relating to election violence (including EGBV) by supported EWER structures
existing EWER structures have ad hoc meetings and disjointed actions to prevent electoral violence in the target counties
Supported EWER structures respond to at least 60% of cases reported to them
2c) Number of commitments to future collaboration between the structures
All structures present at coordination and consultation forums commit to future collaboration
Output 1.1: Information on local-level electoral conflicts, the electoral process and key election milestones is communicated via radio and online channels
a) Number of radio talk show broadcast
Two radio talk shows broadcast per county
b) Number of radio spot messages broadcast
Three spot messages broadcast
Output 1.2: Traditionally conflicting groups are brought together to forge common understanding and consensus on a nonviolent electoral process
a) Number of county dialogues
12 dialogues, six in Marsabit County and six in Trans Nzoia, by M11
b) Number of participants at county dialogue
Up to 25 participants at each dialogue
GB-CHC-1043843-ECYemen_D032
Saferworld
Rebuilding Governance in Yemen
This project aims to strengthen the capacity of civil society and local councils in target communities in Yemen, including marginalised and harder-to-reach groups, such as women and rural CSOs, to contribute to inclusive peacebuilding, effective governance, and improved service delivery in target governorates in Yemen, whilst supporting improved livelihoods for youth.
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
Saferworld
Resonate Yemen
Roward
ACTED
Saferworld
Leonie Northedge
lnorthedge@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
1686059
2244463
1456964.38
565000
2026270.57
2262324
1068730
Saferworld
5650000
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
1601756
European Commission
Saferworld
Output 0.1 Target governorates selected and feasibility/market assessments are completed
a) # of target governorates selected for outcomes 1 and 3
End of year 1 - 4 target governorates selected
b) # of feasibility and market assessments completed
End of year 1 - 1 feasibility assessment completed
End of year 1 - 4 market assessments completed
Output 3.1 YPAs are recruited as interns and trained
a) # of youth recruited for internships
End of year 1 - 10 youth recruited
b) # of trainings/workshops held with YPAs
End of year 1 - 1 training held
Output 2.1 Target CSOs are identified and organisational assessments are completed
a) # of CSOs identified based on selection criteria
End of year 1 - 131 CSOs identified
b) # of jointly agreed organisational capacity assessments
End of year 1 - 24 organisational capacity assessments agreed
Outcome 4.0 Local councils in target communities adopt inclusive and effective planning practices, and are equipped to support youth and CSOs to implement practical responses which respond to community conflict and development needs
a) # of local council members that report having increased skills and knowledge as a result of the training and mentoring provided through the project
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of strategies which prioritise and commit to inclusive planning, including with civil society
TBC (following needs mapping of councils)
To be reported on at end of year 2
c) # of local council members involved in the implementation of youth-led action plans/initiatives and the type of their participation
To be reported on at end of year 2
Specific Objective: To strengthen the capacity of civil society and local councils in target communities in Yemen, including marginalised and harder-to-reach groups, such as women and rural CSOs, to contribute to inclusive peacebuilding, effective governance, and improved service delivery in target governorates in Yemen, whilst supporting improved livelihoods for youth.
a) % of programme stakeholders (youth champions, youth activist network, CSOs and local councils) that report initiatives effectively addressed their target issue
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) % of programme stakeholders who report increased trust and cooperation within the community
To be reported on at end of year 2
c) % of youth activist network, YPAs and CSO members who feel that local council representatives are more responsive to community needs (including issues affecting marginalised groups)
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.7 Knowledge sharing and exchange workshops held with youth activists
a) # of workshops
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.6 Youth-led community initiatives implemented, informed by community needs assessments
a) # and type of youth-led community initiatives
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 3.4 Strategic plans developed for/with district and governorate level councils
a) # of strategic plans
To be reported on at end of year 2
Overall objective: To enhance the resilience and self-reliance of conflict-affected communities in Yemen, creating the conditions for long-term reconstruction and development, through supporting civil society and local councils.
a) Resilience and self-reliance of conflict-affected communities in Yemen is enhanced, creating the conditions for long-term reconstruction and development, through supporting civil society and local councils
1 = achieved
To be reported on at end of project
Output 0.2 Governorate level CSO partners selected and capacity development plans are finalised
a) # of grant agreements with governorate-based CSOs to support outcomes 1 and 3
End of year 1 - 3 grant agreements
b) # of partner capacity development plans developed
End of year 1 - 3 partner capacity development plans developed
Outcome 1.0 Young women and men are equipped with the skills, knowledge and support to better provide for their own livelihoods
% of youth (employment) champions and participants that report having increased employment skills and knowledge as a result of the training and mentoring provided through the project
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of (work-related) opportunities accessed by trained youth (e.g. internships, paid work, self-employment, higher education)
To be reported on at end of year 2
Outcome 2.0 Young women and men in target communities are responding to local conflict and development needs in cooperation with communities, CSOs and local councils, and are engaging in relevant district and governorate level policy and governance processes.
a) # of youth activist members trained on conflict and security concepts (including conflict analysis, conflict and gender sensitivity), and practical skills (e.g. facilitation, leadership, problem analysis and action planning, monitoring, and advocacy)
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # and quality of youth-led action plans produced and implemented with CSOs and local councils (including through seed grants) which respond to concerns raised through community consultations
To be reported on at end of year 2
Outcome 3.0 A diverse group of urban and rural-based CSOs are equipped with the skills, knowledge and resources to implement more effective programming and quality of service provision that contribute to stable and resilient communities.
a) 1. CSOs level of knowledge on 1-5 scalar rating in pre-identified institutional, organisational and technical areas) % of trained CSOs who improve knowledge score in pre-identified areas
TBC following inception period
95% of trained organisations improve score in pre-identified areas
To be reported on at end of year 2
a) 2. CSOs level of knowledge on 1-5 scalar rating in pre-identified institutional, organisational and technical areas) % of trained organisations who are rated 4-5 in pre-identified areas
TBC following inception period
75% of trained organisations are rated 4-5 in pre-identified areas
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # and quality of initiatives implemented by CSOs (through the sub-granting mechanism) that are informed by local level analysis
At least 35 (out of 40 initiatives funded through grants)
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.1 Youth champions are identified and trained
a) # of youth champions identified and trained
End of year 1 - 20 youth champions selected
b) # of trainings/workshops held with youth champions
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.2 Hubs are established and youth trained by champions
a) # of hubs established
End of year 1 - 4 hubs established
b) # of youth trained by champions
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.3 Economic and innovation initiatives implemented
a) # and type of economic initiatives implemented
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of innovation awards/ initiatives implemented
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.4 Sustainability plans are developed and learning products are shared
a) # of sustainability plans
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of learning outputs (e.g. briefings) disseminated on youth economic empowerment initiatives
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 1.5 Youth Network is established
a) # of youth activist members trained
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of trainings/workshops held with youth activists
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 2.2 Select CSOs are trained in pre-defined institutional, organisational and technical areas
a) # of CSOs that are trained in pre-defined institutional, organisational and technical areas
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of trainings/workshops held with CSOs
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 2.3 Priority projects are awarded and implemented by CSO grantees
a) # of grants awarded to CSOs for priority projects
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of projects implemented by CSOs
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 3.2 Needs assessments of local councils completed and capacity building plans are developed
a) # of needs assessments with local councils
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of capacity building plans
To be reported on at end of year 2
Output 3.3 Local council representatives trained in pre-defined institutional, organisational and technical areas
a) # of local councils/local council representatives trained
To be reported on at end of year 2
b) # of joint trainings/workshops for local councils representatives
To be reported on at end of year 2
GB-CHC-1043843-ECYemen_D027
Saferworld
Enhancing womens role in peace and security in Yemen
The overall objective of the action is to promote a more inclusive and sustainable post-conflict stabilisation and peace process in Yemen. The specific objective of the action is to empower women activists and civil society organisations (CSOs) to engage in local peacebuilding processes and initiatives and raise awareness of women's peace and security concerns.
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
Saferworld
National Foundation for Development and Human Rights
Wogood for Human Security Foundation
Yemen Polling Centre
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
Yemen
155740
155740
77870
500000
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
487520
European Commission - Europe Aid
208198
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
241802
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
37321
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
R2: Women’s activists are engaged in local peacebuilding processes and initiatives to address women’s security concerns.
2a: # of conflict-sensitive, relevant and consensus based local action plans produced and implemented.
2 per location
11 action plans were produced, revised for relevance and conflict/gender-sensitivity by the project team, resulting in 7 action plans being implemented with project funding
2b: # and diversity of women actively involved in local level initiatives and community dialogues.
25/30 in each location
2c: # peacebuilding initiatives set up by women action groups that focus on women’s security concerns and/or participation in peacebuilding.
2 per location
7 peacebuilding initiatives were set up by women’s actions groups focusing on women’s security concerns and peacebuilding with project seed funding. A further 8 initiatives were implemented autonomously with no project funding.
2d: % of participants and beneficiaries that report having benefited from the initiatives or that initiatives have effectively addressed their target issue.
80% of feedback solicited is positive
Reporting on R2 indicators will take place in Y2, once the women, peace and security action groups are formed.
R3 – There is increased awareness and openness among communities and formal and informal authorities of women’s security concerns and the role that women can play in peacebuilding processes and initiatives.
3a: # of people pro-actively engaging with awareness raising activities through taking part or providing feedback.
100 people in each location per year
Reporting on R3 indicators will take place in Y2, once the women, peace and security action groups are active.
3b: Level of community understanding of women’s security concerns.
70% of feedback solicited reflects awareness and understanding
Reporting on R3 indicators will take place in Y2, once the women, peace and security action groups are active.
3c: # and diversity of community members and authorities involved in community dialogues.
100 people in each location per year
Reporting on R3 indicators will take place in Y2, once the women, peace and security action groups are active.
3d: # of authorities and community leaders who support the work of the action groups by engaging with initiatives, issuing statements of support or reflecting recommendations/actions from action plans in their own work.
at least 10 authorities or community leaders take supportive action
Reporting on R3 indicators will take place in Y2, once the women, peace and security action groups are active.
3e: # of national and international decision makers who receive and engage with analysis and lessons that emerge from the action.
at least 100 people actively engaged
Reporting on R3 indicators will take place in Y2, once the women, peace and security action groups are active.
Overall Objective: To promote a more inclusive and sustainable post-conflict stabilisation and peace process in Yemen.
Women activists and CSOs have the skills to effectively engage on women’s security concerns and contribute to peacebuilding processes, at the local level in 2 governorates, along with communities and formal authorities becoming more receptive to their needs and demands.
R1: Analysis is produced in up to 4 governorates on how women have been affected by the current crisis and on opportunities for engaging with or establishing local level initiatives for peace and stability.
1a: Conflict and gender sensitive research methodology is produced.
methodology produced and tailored to 4 locations
Completed in Y1.
1b: Conflict and gender sensitive qualitative data gathered and analysed.
data gathered and analysed in 4 locations
Achieved in Y1.
1c: # and diversity of local women’s activists and CSO representatives engaged in collaborative analysis and setting of priorities.
25 people in each location, including women and men (25%) from different age groups, social and political backgrounds
62 women’s activists and CSO representatives (and 35 men) participated in collaborative analysis sessions in February 2017, October 2017 and between April-August 2018
1d: # of women’s activists and CSO representatives that demonstrate the skills needed to collect data and conduct analysis independently.
20 people in each location
22 women’s activists and CSO representatives (women and men) gained skills to collect data and analysis independently.
1e: 1 research paper and 2 sets of written recommendations (1 per location) is produced that reflects new information and analysis on women’s security and role in the current conflict.
1 research paper and 2 sets of written recommendations (1 per location)
1 research paper and 2 policy briefs containing recommendations and analysis on women’s security and role produced.
Specific Objective: To empower women activists and CSOs to engage in local peacebuilding processes and initiatives and raise awareness of women’s peace and security concerns.
At least 25 women activists and CSO representatives participate in and successfully complete training sessions
At least 25 women activists and CSO representatives participate in local peacebuilding initiatives and processes, and raise awareness about women’s role therein
At least 25 women activists and CSO representatives plan and implement local initiatives for peacebuilding
GB-CHC-1043843-ECSouthSudan_D036
Saferworld
Peace and Resilience Project in South Sudan
Saferworld, Children Development Foundation (ACDF), the Community Initiative for Partnership and Development (CIPAD), Organization for Nonviolence and Development (ONAD), the Organization of Children Harmony (TOCH) and Women Development Group (WDG) are working together on a project to strengthen peace and resilience in South Sudan. Working with communities, authorities, civil society organisations and UN agencies, the project aims to increase trust between and among communities, and contribute to stability, inclusivity, durable peace and improved livelihoods.
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
Saferworld
Saferworld
Eva Mutenga
Partnerships Development Manager
emutenga@saferworld.org.uk
http://www.saferworld.org.uk
1008054.99
491945
1008054.99
European Union
Saferworld
128712.72
European Union
Saferworld
704689.69
Saferworld
341945.01
European Union
Saferworld
774023.03
Saferworld
Objective 1: To improve community resilience through strengthening their capacities to mitigate and resolve conflict and insecurity and create an enabling environment for the provision of basic services.
Indicator 1.1: Number and type of local and cross-community peace and security issues resolved by the communities in a coordinated manner.
28 (125%) local and cross-community peace and security
issues resolved through established community mechanisms.
Indicator 1.2: Percentage of CAGs who perceive an improvement in overall local and cross-community peace and security in the past 12 months.
92% (36 out of 39) of CAGs (group-decision) reported improvement in overall local and cross-community
peace and security in their communities over the past 18 months.
Output 1.2: CAGs identify, prioritise and address local and cross-community peace, security, conflict issues and basic services needs in a coordinated and collaborative manner.
Indicator 1.2.1: Number of community action groups meetings conducted.
481 (247%) CAG meetings conducted across 39 CAGs in
seven locations. Of 481 CAG meetings, 171 meetings were
independently organised and facilitated by the CAGs without financial or logistical support from Saferworld and/or partners.
Indicator 1.2.2: Number of community action plans implemented by CAGs through community self-reliance initiative and/or support from other actors.
281 (103%) community-led action plans developed and implemented by the CAGs themselves without financial support from Saferworld and/or partners.
Indicator 1.2.3: Number of action plans implemented by CAGs through support from the project’s seed fund.
44 (113%) seed grants disbursed to complement the efforts of the CAGs and communities as they sought to address key peace and security challenges in their localities.
Output 1.1 Up to 39 CAGs with improved knowledge and skills to address peace, security and basic services concerns of their communities.
Indicator 1.1.1: Number of community action groups (CAGs) restructured and women and youth clusters established.
39 (100%) CAG restructuring into women and youth sub-clusters completed at the beginning of the project, and they were active throughout the project lifetime.
Indicator 1.1.2: Number of CAGs trained on community security approaches and local level-planning.
39 (100%) CAGs (comprised of 30 members each) trained
on conflict analysis, conflict prevention, resolution and transformation; dialogue facilitation, action planning and
other appropriate topics based on the needs.
Output 2.2: Civil society actors have increased capacity to engage with relevant authorities to advocate on local and cross-community peace, security and conflict issues.
Indicator 2.2.1: Number of state-level civil society platforms supported to advocate on community peace and security issues.
6 (120%) civil society meetings supported across the four CSO platforms to allow them discuss and to advocate with local authorities on local level peace and security issues affecting communities where they live and work. Two additional CSO meetings conducted in Kuajok and Wau to convene a meeting with the respective CSO actors.
Indicator 2.2.2: Number of civil society organisations represented in state-level civil society platforms
84 (140%) civil society organisations participated in the six
State-level CSO platform meetings.
Output 2.1: Formal and informal authorities, communities and CSOs jointly identify and respond to local and cross-community peace, security and issues.
Indicator 2.1.1: Number of state-level round tables conducted between authorities, CSOs and community representatives.
5 (125%) 4 State-level and 1-regional-level roundtable meetings conducted. A roundtable is a multi-stakeholder
platform that bring community leaders, authorities, youth and women representatives, civil society representatives and other actors to discuss issues pertaining to peace and stability at local level and to link up them to State-level.
Indicator 2.1.2: Number of development actors using CAGs insights provided by the action to engage the communities.
10 (200%)
development actors for example, UNDP, UNIMISS, IOM, South Sudan Red Cross (SSRC, Centre for Emergency and
Development Strategy (CEDS) and others used community insights to support their initiatives through our community action group mechanisms.
Objective 2: To strengthen the capacity of civil society actors to collectively advocate at local, sub-national and national levels and engage authorities to respond to community-identified peace and security issues in a manner that is conflict- and gender-sensitive.
Indicator 2.1: Number of change in practices, adoption of policies, laws and regulation by relevant actors at sub-national and national-level.
18 (150%) change in practices, adoption of policies, laws and
regulation made by relevant actors at local, subnational and national level.
Indicator 2.2: Percentage of CAGs who perceive that the authorities are more responsive to their needs and priorities compared to the last 12 months.
90% (35 out of 39) of CAGs (group-decision) perceived that
authorities are more responsive to communities needs and priorities compared to the last 18 months.
GB-CHC-1043843-CSSF_A022
Saferworld
Resourcing Change: Supporting Women’s Rights Organisations (WROs) in Fragile and Conflict Affected States (FCAS)
Women's Rights organisations WROs are provided flexible and core funding opportunities to meet self-defined priorities, and in turn increase and strengthen their work on peacebuilding, gender equality, women’s empowerment and participation, GBV prevention and response, and COVID-19 response and preparedness.
Department for International Development
Saferworld
Saferworld
Women for Women International (UK)
Actual start date of project
Saferworld
Eva Mutenga
Partnerships Development Manager
+211915723535
emutenga@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
1916851.00
521567
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Saferworld
444575
FCDO
Saferworld
96725
FCDO
Saferworld
183315
FCDO
Saferworld
245928
FCDO
Saferworld
154083
Saferworld
545822
Saferworld
233056
FCDO
Saferworld
590036
Saferworld
191685
FCDO
Saferworld
Impact 1.0: Gender equality and prospects for building sustainable and inclusive peace are strengthened.
Score on Global Gender Gap Index
N/A
Output 1: WROs are provided flexible and core funding opportunities to meet self-defined priorities, and in turn increase and strengthen their work on peacebuilding, gender equality, women’s empowerment and participation, GBV prevention and response, and COVID-19 response and preparedness.
Output Indicator 1.1: Number of WROs receiving flexible, core funding
21 (10 Nigeria, 5 South Sudan and 6 Yemen)
Output Indicator 1.2: Total value (GBP) of grants distributed to WROs
disbursements to 21 WROs in Nigeria, South Sudan and Yemen)
£214,099 - South Sudan (5 WROs)
£243,361 – Yemen (6 WROs)
£200,757 – Nigeria (10 WROs)
Output Indicator 1.3: Number and type of initiatives and/or institutional strengthening actions implemented with the flexible funding provided
Output 2: WROs are supported to strengthen their organisational capacity in a strategic, demand-led way and through accompaniment models based on solidarity, meaningful engagement and equal partnerships principles.
Output Indicator 2.1: Number of capacity strengthening plans co-designed with WROs (disaggregated by type of WRO)
Output Indicator 2.2: Percentage of actions identified in capacity strengthening plans that are addressed through meaningful capacity strengthening initiatives and opportunities (as reported by the WROs)
Output 3: WROs are provided appropriate spaces to share evidence and learning with each other and the global WPS sector, and convened to work together towards common understandings of peacebuilding and inclusive development.
Output Indicator 3.1: Number of national and international learning events and/or meetings that bring WROs together for collaboration and share learnings with international community
4 national events (one per country), 2 international
Achieved: 6 (4 national events (one per country), 2 international (one with WROs and one with donor)
Output Indicator 3.2: Number of participants at learning and dissemination events (disaggregated by gender, age, actor type, event)
21 WROs: (74 women 21 men)
6 Consortium partners: ( 20 women and 6 men)
Total: 121 participants (94 women and 27 men)
Output Indicator 3.3: Number of policy and learning briefs documenting evidence-based outcomes and learning from project distributed to NGO and donor actors
Outcome 1.0: Women’s rights organisations (WROs) increase their independent role in leading programming and advocacy on peacebuilding, gender equality, women’s empowerment and participation, GBV prevention and response and COVID-19 response and preparedness.
Outcome Indicator 1: Percentage of respondents among WROs reporting increased capacity in their self-defined organisational and programmatic priority areas for capacity building
81.3% of the WROs reported increased capacity in their self-defined organisational and programmatic priority areas for capacity building. These included financial management and reporting, MEL, safeguarding, gender and conflict analysis etc
Outcome Indicator 2: Number and description of harvested outcomes demonstrating results from WRO’s funded initiatives to meet their self-defined priorities
Outcome Indicator 3: Percentage of participants in national and international learning and coordination events reporting that events are valuable spaces for learning and coordination
96.7% participants in national and international learning and coordination events reporting that events are valuable spaces for learning and coordination
GB-CHC-1043843-UNPBF_Kyrgyzstan_K007
Saferworld
Supporting young people’s peacebuilding participation in Kyrgyzstan:
integrating a youth-led mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) approach
The project’s main goal is to improve young people's meaningful participation in community decision-making and peacebuilding by reducing the psycho-social barriers, transforming harmful gender norms that contribute to conflict and violence, and gender-sensitively addressing their mental health concerns and priorities.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Grants Management
Rachel Huang
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
599732
209906.28
209906
United Nations Peacebuilding Fund
Saferworld
105585.51
127206.06
4709.72
79456.68
102380.63
76113.47
179919.66
103876.66
Outcome 1: Youth- and women-led CSOs are supported to research the MHPSS needs of young people in the selected locations, increasing the knowledge base for more effective programming responses and advocacy
Outcome Indicator 1a: Percentage of Saferworld and partner staff surveyed who report an increase in their level of knowledge related to the MHPSS needs of young people
Outcome 2: Young women and men will have greater access to MHPSS support and referral pathways through gender-sensitive self-support groups and increased capacity of mentors and psychologists, through a survivor-centered approach, leading to greater resilience to security and social problems they face in their lives, as well as increased confidence participating in community peacebuilding action
Outcome Indicator 2a: Level of satisfaction of people with mental health and psychosocial problems and/or their families regarding the care they received [IASC MHPSS Standard Indicator 5.8
Outcome Indicator 2b: Number of young women and men in the selected locations who were referred to the gender-sensitive self-support groups from other service providers/centers
Outcome Indicator 2c: Percentage of mentors trained on MHPSS issues who report increased confidence in their understanding of mental health and peacebuilding issues in their communities and on appropriate methodologies for addressing them
Outcome 3: Youth-led self-support groups and their mentors have increased capacity to address mental health issues, participate in decision making and peacebuilding responses in their communities and advocate with authorities for more youth- and gender-sensitive approaches to mental health and other peace and security priorities of young people – helping create improved services and access for young people that will enable them to resolve problems and take an active part in their communities
Outcome Indicator 3a: Percentage of mentors who report an increase in self-support groups’ capacities to address their MHPSS needs beyond the project lifetime
Outcome Indicator 3b: Percentage of youth groups that proceed to implement their own action plans
Outcome Indicator 3c: Examples of significant outcomes from action plan implementation, including increased community activism among participants
Example outcomes demonstrate youth’s MHPSS needs, including gender- and age-specific needs, being effectively addressed
Output 1.1
Baseline assessment to map out and identify mental health needs of 900 young women and men from six target locations (Bishkek/Osh cities, Osh, Batken, Chui, Issyk-Kul provinces)
Output Indicator 1.1.1: Number of young women and men participating in baseline assessment
Output 1.2 Summary document incorporating main analysis and findings from the baseline assessment, including overall picture and location-specific context analysis serves as basis for formation of self-support groups.
Output Indicator 1.2.1: Number of baseline assessment reports produced
Output 1.3 Criteria for the selection of mentors and methodology for self-support groups is developed.
Output Indicator 1.3.1: Criteria for mentor selection and self-support group methodology is developed
Output 1.4 Six online anonymous information/outreach sessions on conflict and mental health are made available to young men and women, using digital resources.
Output Indicator 1.4.1: Number of online sessions
Output Indicator 1.4.2: Number of participants in online sessions
Output 2.1 Two-day induction trainings for mentors in Bishkek (for participants from the north – Bishkek, Chui, Issyk-Kul) and Osh (for participants from the south – Osh/Batken) covering introduction to project, mental health issues, gender/conflict sensitivity, context analysis findings
Output Indicator 2.1.1: Number of mentors participating in two-day induction trainings
Output 2.2 Two 2-day trainings on mental health for all mentors together – one in Osh and one in Bishkek (both to be held soon after the induction training).
Output Indicator 2.2.1: Number of mentors participating in two-day mental health trainings
Output 2.3 15 self-support groups (approximately 3 per location) formed and with clearly defined themes to address
Output Indicator 2.3.1: Number of self-support groups formed
Output 3.2 Quarterly exchange experience meetings for mentors to encourage sharing learning and lessons from the youth led self-support groups.
Output Indicator 3.2.1: Number of mentors attending quarterly experience meetings
Output 3.1 5-10 action plans and/or awareness raising campaigns developed and implemented by mentors and self-support group participants (supported by project partners).
Indicator 3.1.1: Number of action plans and/or awareness-raising campaigns developed by self-support groups
Output 2.4 6 monthly supervision visits by psychologists to support mentors
Output Indicator 2.4.1: Number of monthly supervision visits by psychologists
Output 3.3 MHPSS expert working group composed of mentors and project partners is established, to agree on issues to advocate/communicate on (including via digital networks), drawing on lessons and analysis gathered throughout the project
(referral mechanisms, self-support group sustainability, youth-friendly mental health services, legislation, access to MHPSS services)
Output Indicator 3.3.1: Number of meetings of MHPSS expert working group
Output 3.4 1 roundtable session led by the MHPSS expert working group to engage/seek support from government actors (e.g., MOH, Ministry of youth, Ministry of Internal Affairs, juvenile police inspectors, neighborhood inspectors, ayil okmotu heads) on the issues identified as MHPSS priorities for young women and men in the self-support groups.
Short briefing produced, showcasing the main lessons learned and advocacy messaging to promote/scale the project in other locations/ensure sustainability and replication.
Output Indicator 3.4.1: Number and description of government actors (institutions) engaged through roundtable sessions
Output Indicator 3.4.2 Number of briefings produced
Output Indicator 3.4.3 Number of key stakeholders and decision-makers reached through outreach and dissemination
GB-CHC-1043843-UNPBF_SouthSudan_K008
Saferworld
Challenging harmful and patriarchal gender norms for better mental health and peace and security, amongst women and girls and communities in the Wunlit Triangle
The project will ensure women and girls enjoy better mental health outcomes through improved access to mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) and gender-based violence (GBV) referral pathways, strengthened government policies and freedom from GBV caused by conflict, enabling them to meaningfully participate in economic and political decision-making and social life at household, community, state and national levels.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Saferworld
Eva Mutenga
Partnerships Development Manager
emutenga@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
1500000
525000
UNDP
Saferworld
525000
UNDP
Saferworld
903708.19
Outcome 1: Women and girls have increased access to GBV and MHPSS support and referral pathways through women’s collectives, and enhancing solidarity and accompaniment amongst women and girls
Outcome Indicator 1a: Number and percentage of women and girls who reported their awareness and knowledge on access to GBV and MHPSS support and service referral pathways have been improved.
73%.
Broken down asfollows: 35 (22women and 13girls) out of 48(31 women and17) girls)participants
Outcome Indicator 1b: Number of GBV survivors who accessed GBV and MHPSS supports and/or referral pathways through the established mechanisms.
Outcome Indicator 1c: Number and types of local and/or cross-community conflict and insecurity issues address that could affect women and girls wellbeing and safety.
Outcome 2: Communities, including, religious and traditional leaders, young women and men understand the harmful traditions, and social and gender norms which drive conflict and create negative misconceptions of women and girls, and take steps to prevent and mitigate GBV.
Outcome Indicator 2a: Number and percentage of community leaders’ who report increased in knowledge and awareness of the interlinkages between gender, peace and security and its impact on girls and women mental wellbeing and safety.
Data disaggregation: Sex, age, location
63 % (25 participants out of 40)
Outcome Indicator 2b: Number and types of actions and/or responses made by communities, including, religious and traditional leaders, young women and men to mitigate and address harmful traditional social and gender norms that drive conflict and affect women and girls wellbeing including GVB and mental health issues.
Outcome 3: Local authorities and CSOs (including WROs and networks) understand the harmful traditions, and social and gender norms which drive conflict and negatively impact women and girls, and take steps to incorporate women’s and girls’ priorities into government plans.
Outcome Indicator 3a: Number and percentage of government officials who report increased in knowledge and awareness of gaps in GBV and mental health policies, interlinkages between conflict-GBV-mental and change in attitudes on gender
Data disaggregation: Sex, age, location, type of gov. institution employed in
Outcome Indicator 3b: Number and type of gender sensitive action and/or responses made by relevant local authorities to address priority women and girl issues including GBV and mental health concerns.
Outcome Indicator 3c: Number of CSO partners who report increase in capacities to engage and advocate on priority women and girl issues including GBV and mental health at local and sub-national-level.
Output 1.1: Women and girls have increased peer support and accompaniment to access MHPSS and GBV services.
Output Indicator 1.1.1: Number of women and girl friendly and safe spaces established and/or supported.
Output Indicator 1.1.2: Number of women and girls reached through peer support to create awareness on available GBV and MHPSS support and services referral pathways.
Output 1.2: Women and girls have increased awareness on the interlinkages between conflict-GBV-mental health, and available MHPSS and GBV services.
Output Indicator 1.2.1: Number and types of training material developed.
Output Indicator 1.2.2: Number of women and girls trained on the linkages between conflict, mental health and GBV and available GBV and MHPSS services and referral pathways.
Output 1.3: Strengthen GBV and MHPSS referral pathways for women and girls.
Output Indicator 1.3.1: Number of referral pathways developed and/or strengthen.
Output Indicator 1.3.2: Number of women and girls trained on basic mental health and psychosocial support skills to provide counselling support to women and girls and making referrals.
Output Indicator 1.3.3: Number of micro-grants disbursed and implemented to address priority women and girls’ issues including conflict, GBV and mental health concerns.
Output 2.1: Young women and men, have increased awareness and sensitivity of the interlinkages between conflict-GBV-mental health and take steps to sensitize the wider peer group.
Output Indicator 2.1.1: Number of youth peace forums (YPFs) established and supported.
Output Indicator 2.1.2: Number of sensitization campaign conducted (through YPFs) on harmful traditional social and gender norms that drive conflict and affect women and girls wellbeing including GBV and mental health issues.
Output Indicator 2.1.3: Number of people reached with sensitization campaign on harmful traditional social and gender norms that drive conflict and affect women and girls wellbeing including GBV and mental health issues.
Output 2.2: Key community actors have increased awareness and sensitivity of the interlinkages between conflict-GBV-mental health and take steps to sensitize the wider community.
Output Indicator 2.2.1: Number of key influential community actors identified and engaged in various activities in the community.
Output Indicator 2.2.2: Number of outreach and sensitization meetings conducted with key influential community actors on harmful social and gender norms that drive conflict and affect women and girls wellbeing including GBV and mental health issues in the community
Output Indicator 2.2.3: Number of people reached with community sensitization through key champions on harmful social and gender norms that drive conflict and affect women and girls wellbeing including GVB and mental health issues in the community
Output 3.1: CSO partners and WROs have increased capacity to engage and advocate with authorities on women’s and girls’ rights, needs and priorities.
Output Indicator 3.1.1: Number CSO partners provided with demand-based capacity strengthening, bespoke training, institutional support, accompaniment and mentoring.
Output Indicator 3.1.2: Number of state-level WROs platforms meeting conducted to support CSO partners and WROs collective advocate on women’s and girls’ rights, needs and priorities including GBV and mental health concerns.
Output Indicator 3.1.3: Number of CSO partners communications and advocacy strategy developed.
Output 3.2: Local and national-level authorities have access to evidences-based information on women’s and girls’ priorities to inform their plan and responses.
Output Indicator 3.2.1: Number of inter-county and inter-state dialogue and advocacy forums conducted between women’s groups, WROs and local authorities to enable women and girls to share their concerns and push for appropriate action to address their issues, including, GBV and mental health.
Output Indicator 3.2.2: Number of advocacy and communications output produced on the linkages between conflict, mental health and GBV to advocate with relevant authorities at sub-national and national-level.
Output Indicator 3.2.3: Number of relevant local, sub-national and national authorities reached through bilateral meetings, county/state and/or national-level roundtable to engage them on priority women and girl issues including GBV and mental health concerns.
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_U010
Saferworld
Promoting a sustainable and locally-led community based policing in the Kyrgyz Republic
The purpose of this award is to build sustainable support and cooperation between citizens and security providers, so that the community policing approach is being successfully implemented by Community Policing Partnership Teams (CPPT), based on multi-year, strategic Local Crime Prevention Center’s (LCPC) plans, and is institutionalized in local and national governments’ agendas.
US Department of State
Saferworld
Saferworld
Rachel Huang
499997.75
500000
534358.33
130624.52
130834.93
137472.96
120203.67
123215.93
157351.76
130828.10
107153.73
114163.46
99924.86
126169.81
100394.44
131861
131866.68
135875.63
100394.44
136512.39
126866.68
111488.44
133318.08
Objective 1: Strengthening understanding of, and support for, community policing among key
leaders within the Kyrgyz police and government officials
Political and financial support among national, state, and local officials for LCPCs/CPPTs is increased
Number of gender- and conflict -sensitive action plans produced and implemented by LCPCs/CPPTs (including representatives of authorities and police) that respond to concerns and priorities raised through community consultations and assessments
Increase above the baseline in number of coordination/dialogue meetings between key actors
Number of actions/changes in practice taken forward by MoI officials and local government as agreed in work plans that would demonstrate level of engagement and participation of MoI and local governance in community security problems' identification
% of CPPT members who feel that authorities are more responsive to community security concerns/needs
Number of police officers who report increased skils and knowledge about gender-sensitivity
Number of outreach campaigns attended and/or facilitated by female police.
Objective 2: Developing police-public problem-solving partnerships in selected communities
% of community members (including CPPT), working together with police and local government officials, claim ownership and leadership for solving issues in their communities and share these successful experiences willingly with other communities.
Level of input from community members in the development and implementation of action plans led by LCPCs/CPPTs.
Number of women, youth, minorities and other marginalized community members involved in the project and problem solving increases.
Objective 3: Creating a strategy that ensures sustainability of LCPCs beyond the project’s duration
Number of additional communities buy into community policing philosophy and activities and actively support and participate in development and implementation of action plans.
Number of CPPTs that have a plan for financial sustainability after project support is no longer provided.
Intermediate Results 1.1: Cooperation between national, province and local level government authorities (including police), CPPTs and civil society is strengthened to address communities’ security concerns and priorities.
Number of meetings organized and facilitated at the national level
Number of advocacy meetings with MPs to emphasize government's responsibility for taking over community policing and LCPCs/CPPTs
Intermediate Results 1.2: Government takes steps to institutionalize community policing by allocating increased funds to LCPCs/CPPTs to make them sustainable.
Number of action plans developed and implemented
Number of LCPCs provided with funds for implementation of action plans
Number of consultations per location
Number of CSAs conducted and updated
Number of information meetings at province levels
Number of LCPCs renovated/constructed
Number of locations identified for new LCPCs
Intermediate Results 1.3: Female police officers are supported to meaningfully participate in community policing/security and have greater capacity to address domestic violence issues in cooperation with LCPCs
Number of workshop participants
Number of workshop participants
Number of workshops on peacebuilding and community security
Number of outreach campaigns attended and/or facilitated by female police
Number of workshops conducted on gender and conflict sensitivity
Number of workshops on conflict and gender sensitivity; and peacebuilding and community security
Number of participants
Intermediate Results 2.1: In the selected locations, communities work together with police and local authorities; they have improved agency and capacity to identify, prioritize and address issues in their communities and share experiences and lessons learnt with other communities
Number of workshop participants
Number of participants per meeting
Number of newly established CPPTs
Representation of community members/civil society in CPPTs (i.e. composition of CPPTs)
Number of community security cycle trainings
Number of workshops on fundraising and grants management
Number of cases demonstrating increased and meaningful interactions between community members and the police addressing these issues.
Number of experience exchange workshops
Intermediate Results 2.3: Women, youth, ethnic minorities and other marginalized groups increasingly participate in community security decision-making and problem-solving
Number of curriculums updated
Number of applications submitted for outreach activities
Number of trainings delivered
Number of participants
Number of outreach campaigns developed and implemented
Number of sub-grants provided
Intermediate Results 3.1: Additional communities buy into the community policing philosophy and principles and practices and actively participate in or support the development and implementation of community security action plans
Number of public-police accountability meetings
Number of public-police relations events
Intermediate Results 3.2: CPPTs have a long-term plan for financial sustainability beyond the project duration
Number of advocacy meetings with members of municipal parliaments (Local Kenesh) to distribute booklet
GB-CHC-1043843-USIP_V008
Saferworld
Building peace and security through support to women‐led CSOs in Uzbekistan
The objective is to strengthen the capacity of women-led CSOs, enabling them to work with women and youth along with local authorities to jointly address community security concerns, including those associated with participation in and/or support for violent groups.
United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Saferworld
Saferworld
Rachel Huang
154031.90
191009.97
80000
70000
26663.53
94161.70
122766.61
70000
60041.87
101450.03
Outcome 2: Two existing and two new CSWGs design and implement community led-action plans that address community priorities, including the priorities of women and youth, and the reintegration of returnees where relevant.
Percentage of action plans developed that receive buy-in from communities and authorities
Number and description of outcomes from community-led action plans
Output 1.1: CSAs conducted on the drivers of insecurity, conflict and violence
Number of research methodologies developed
Number of women-led CSOs' representatives/members trained on conducting CSAs
Number of district -level CSAs on the drivers of insecurity and violence produced
Number of trainings held on conducting CSAs
Output 1.2: Capacity of women-led CSN member organizations strengthened and their activities supported
Number of plans developed for establishing new CSWGs
Number of newly established CSWGs
Number of trainings on Community Security/Policing for the newly established CSWGs
Number of resource centers for CSWGs established
Number of participants in trainings on community security/policing for the new CSWGs
Output 2.2: Action plans implemented and seed funds disbursed
Total value (USD) of seed funds disbursed
Number of action plans implemented
Number of reports produced with outcomes, challenges and opportunities
Output 3.2: Dialogue events held between CSOs and national authorities
Number of national -level dialogue events
Number of reports produced highlighting recommendations from national-level dialogue event
Number of online international learning events held
Number of participants in national-level dialogue
Number of participants in international online events to share CSA findings and lessons learned from project implementation
Outcome 1: Women-led CSOs increasingly identify the drivers of insecurity, conflict, and violence in their communities, carry out gender and conflict analyses, and lead on community security/policing and peacebuilding responses to insecurity, conflict, and violence
Percentage of representatives from women-led CSOs trained on conducting CSAs who report increased confidence in their understanding of the drivers of conflict and violence
Percentage of CSWG members trained on community security approaches who report increased confidence in their understanding of these approaches
Outcome 3: Women-led CSOs, individually and collectively, increasingly conduct evidence-based advocacy on behalf of their communities, holding security providers (including authorities) accountable for the delivery of inclusive and responsive policies and practices.
Percentage of representatives from women-led CSOs participating in workshops who report improved confidence in their ability to advocate on behalf of their communities
Number of authorities at national-level dialogues who make a specific commitment to implement the recommendations of women-led CSOs supported through the project
Output 2.1: Online workshop facilitated to develop plans to work with new and existing CSWGs
Number of CSWG members participating in workshop to develop community-led action plans
Number of action plans developed to challenge, advocate against and address harmful gender norms and behaviours that perpetuate exclusion (including of returnees), gender discrimination, and violence
Output 3.1: Workshop for CSOs facilitated on developing advocacy messaging and communication outputs, and on conducting effective advocacy meetings and dissemination
Number of workshops on effective communication and advocacy and number of participants
Number of advocacy and communication strategies developed
Number of participants from women-led CSOs in workshop on effective advocacy and communications
GB-CHC-1043843-USStateDpt_V009
Saferworld
Strengthening civic engagement of young women and men in Kyrgyzstan to prevent recruitment into violent and criminal groups, and address local security concerns
Building on Saferworld and Foundation for Tolerance International’s (FTI’s) existing work on strengthening community security in Kyrgyzstan, the proposed project would expand our engagement with young women and men in Batken, Chui, Osh and Jalal-Abad provinces. Through a range of trainings, experience exchange workshops, smalls-grants and outreach at the national, sub-national and local levels, the project will provide spaces for young men and women – from both rural and urban areas – to come together and discuss the issues that affect them (such as civic identity, gender equality, family pressures, trafficking in persons, violence in schools, and recruitment into violent or criminal groups). This will lead to their greater civic engagement and joint activism to demand for young people’s concerns to be addressed. The project will provide the means for young women and men to identify their priorities locally and to come up with solutions that provide positive avenues for positive self-expression, which will reduce their involvement in violent or criminal groups that undermine peace and stability.
US Department of State
Saferworld
Saferworld
Rachel Huang
119975
56966.76
33180.37
29827.87
51364.13
22165.34
46445.53
Objective 1: Train young people from throughout Kyrgyzstan on topics such as conflict and gender sensitivity, inclusive and collaborative action to address local security concerns (through the community security cycle), and information sessions on media literacy, gender equality, social and gender norms, mental health support, and awareness of recruitment tactics for violent and criminal groups
1.1.1: Percentage of participants reporting they had meaningful opportunities to apply the knowledge and skills grained through the trainings in design and implementation of initiatives responding to their priorities
Objective 2: Provide financial support (small grants) to young men and women to work together with local authorities (such as prevention centers and ayil okmotu) to develop and implement joint initiatives that respond to young people’s priorities, and provide space for young men and women to exchange experiences and lessons from implementation
2.1.1: # and description of outcomes from joint youth initiatives
Objective 3: National (Bishkek) and regional (Batken and Osh) authorities and policymakers are made aware of young women’s and men’s concerns and priorities by attending a series of roundtables/dialogues, and ensure their decisions are responsive to them
3.1.1: # of stakeholders/NGOs reporting increase in communication and coordination with other stakeholders on issues related to insecurity and violence following participation in project
Activity 2.1: At least 14 initiatives funded by sub-grants developed and implemented by youth together with authorities, community leaders and civil society to respond to youth priorities
Output 2.1.2: # of new groups or initiatives created, dedicated to resolving conflict or the drivers of conflict
Output 2.1.3: # of women members of initiatives supported or created by the project to prevent and respond to the drivers of violence
Activity 2.2: 1 online training sessions for youth participants on development of initiatives
Output 2.2.1: Number of youth participants trained
Activity 1.1: 2 trainings (1 in Bishkek and 1 in Osh) for marginalized young women and men , young deputies of municipal parliaments and youth influencers on conflict and gender sensitivity, inclusive and collaborative action to address local security concerns (through the community security cycle), and information sessions on media literacy, gender equality, social and gender norms, mental health support, and awareness of recruitment tactics for violent and criminal groups
Output 1.1.2: Number of youth participants trained
Activity 2.3: 2 national-level learning and exchange workshops for youth participants to share lessons from the process of implementing the initiatives
Output 2.3.1: Number of youth participants in learning and exchange workshops
Activity 3.1: 1 national-level roundtable between civil society and authorities/government (including MIA) touching on key lessons from the project, to discuss conflict/gender sensitivity, recruitment into violent groups, and recommendations on improving responses to human trafficking
Output 3.1.2: Number of participants at national-level roundtable
Activity 3.2: 2 province-level discussions with authorities, CSOs and youth activists in Batken and Osh, including young women, with a gender-sensitive focus on issues that affect these regions, including trafficking across borders, recruitment of labor migrants into violent groups, inter-ethnic tensions, lack of employment/education opportunities
Output 3.2.1: Number of participants in province-level discussions
Activity 3.3: 2 TV programs/videos developed jointly
with youth participants, civil society, media representatives and partners touching on a range of issues covered by the project
Output 3.3.1: # of broadcasts and type of TV/radio station (province/national) produced as a result of the project
GB-CHC-1043843-F013
Saferworld
Building Constituencies for Peaceful Change
Reduced violence and improved physical security / freedom from fear
Saferworld
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The programme aims to contribute to addressing root causes of conflict and instability focusing on civil society at local and national levels as proactive participants in improving human security and social cohesion. It aims to bridge divides between groups through inclusive local-level actions for peace and conflict transformation.
Saferworld
Silke Nebenfuehr
Strategic Grants Manager
snebenfuehr@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
The Graystone Centre 28 Charles Square London, N1 6HT United Kingdom
1198175
1403908
1527236
1054030
1039593
6222942
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Saferworld
Outcome 2: Civil society networks, organisations, and leaders (from inside and outside of the country) build solidarity and promote social cohesion with the population by connecting local actors and priorities with national ones.
This outcome will track steps taken by civil society networks towards creating opportunities for peaceful process and conflict transformation. Emphasis will be placed on inclusive processes and the ability of civil society networks to contribute to addressing root causes of insecurity through connecting local priorities with national ones.
Indicator O2: Number and type of proactive and jointly organised initiatives on identified issues that platform members jointly implement
A platform that brings together civil society from state and lower level to discuss, plan and address human security issues will be formed. Membership to the platform will be voluntary. The platforms will be supported with small grants by the project to implement agreed on actions to address identified human security issues. This will take a variety of forms depending on identified issues. Proactive initiatives are actions that the civil society develops with no external influence.
Activities under Outcome 2 were modified to lead with the creation of the small grants mechanism, activities for which commenced in Q2 of Year 2. We conducted an in-depth civil society actor mapping in all areas of operation order to gain a better understanding of the collective issues and needs of communities, as well as the existing capacity of civil society actors at the sub-regional and regional levels on the basis of which a more targeted small grants mechanism was developed, detailed analysis of civil society space, youth and women initiatives and existing civil society networks was developed and additional implementing partners identified.
Outcome 3: National-level comparative analysis and research informs national, regional and international advocacy messages and cross-border policy recommendations for addressing deficiencies in human security and the root causes of armed conflict, instability, and irregular migration.
This outcome will track the extent to which national, regional and international actors demonstrate awareness of the impact of aid, political and investment frameworks, and the extent to which they review their approaches as a result of research and advocacy by civil society actors
Indicator O3: Number of priorities, messages and decisions of key international and national actors that incorporate civil society analysis and research
Priorities, messages and decisions are defined as actions, statements and policies that are taken by both international and national actors which make reference to priorities, messages and context analysis provided by civil society networks
There have been no changes to this outcome; activities and outputs that contribute to this outcome commenced in Q1 of Year 1. Initial results are beginning to be seen under this outcome. As a result of regular analysis and meetings with key policy and advocacy actors, there are signs of uptake of key messaging at the regional and international levels.
Together with our partners, we provided regular analysis and organised meetings with key policy and advocacy actors. Project reviews show there is uptake of key messaging at regional and international levels.
Output 1.1.1 Number and type of PAR reports produced and disseminated
This output falls under outcome 1; sub-outcome 1.1. It aims to track the immediate result of local level research conducted by Community Action Group (CAG) members as a result of the Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach. The research will be used to inform local level action plans and initiatives.
1.1.1 # of PAR reports produced and disseminated
PAR refers to participatory action research. This indicator is a count of reports produced and shared with community members by the community action groups. The PAR reports produced may take a number of different formats and will be responsive to the research themes and approaches. Reports will be shared during community meetings/gatherings. Sharing means either providing copies to members or presenting the findings orally.
The activities connected to this output originally were scheduled to begin in Q4 of Year 1 with a target of 4 PAR reports produced. However, they will begin in the second half of year 2 following the completion of the community level assessments (CLA) within the programme implementation areas. Identification of locations, and selection of relevant PAR and CCS facilitators, among others required a detailed understanding of the context. The CLA process has been completed in the target locations, and CCS local level facilitators have been trained to roll out this component gradually. The target value for year 2 has therefore been increased to 9 to include the YR 1 target.
Activities contributing to this output will begin later in the year.
This output is no longer being tracked. Participatory action and research was reviewed, refined and adjusted for contextual relevance. The proposed Participatory Action Research (PAR) was modified to the Participatory Action Learning in Crisis (PALC) approach, a methodology hinged on appreciative inquiry of existing community initiated coping mechanisms and initiatives in response to conflict and crisis. PALC does not have a research report as an output.
Output 2.1.1 Civil society platforms have the skills and knowledge to raise awareness and advocate with national platforms on the impact of national dynamics on local communities
Building capacity of civil society in advocacy and awareness creation will improve their ability to articulate issues raised by local communities to national platforms
2.1.1 % of Civil society platform members that report having increased skills and knowledge to raise awareness and advocate with national platforms
This is a self-reported indicator that will track skills and knowledge as perceived by the recipients of capacity building conducted by the project. Only those civil society members who are directly targeted by the project will self-measure their capacity changes (i.e. members of the civil society platforms).
Activities that contribute to this output will be implemented in Year 2
Activities that contribute to this output will be implemented in Q4 of Y3
Output 2.2.1 CSOs jointly implement projects developed from regional working group discussions
The project will support regional civil society platforms to meet and dialogue with a view of supporting collaboration through development and implementation of joint initiatives
2.2.1 # and type of initiatives that are jointly implemented by civil society platforms at regional level
This is a count of activities or projects implemented by civil society (both formal and informal) that attend and are part of regional platforms supported by the project. The activities will cover a wide-range of topics and approaches/methodologies.
Activities related to this output will begin in Year 2 of the project
Consultation meetings were held with 13 (9 males, 4 males) civil society actors to identify opportunities for civil society collaboration and formation of civil society networks. Based on findings from these meetings, the program will work with civil society actors to implement activities aimed towards improving civil society collaboration and impact.
Civil Society actors from diverse groups organised an initiative aimed at advocating for inclusion of marginalized groups, women and youth in ongoing processes. Through the initiative, a variety of groups and actors were given a platform to raise their concerns and priorities.
Output 3.1.1 Revised terms of reference/strategy for national level civil society collaboration in place
This refers to an updated guiding document on national level civil society collaboration
3.1.1 Revised terms of reference/strategy available
The indicator provides evidence of new direction being available for national civil society collaboration
Terms of reference to guide the review process have been produced and circulated for consensus. Once the process has been concluded, this will be reported on in 2018.
The theory of change that guides the process of collaboration was improved, simplified and circulated to contributors.
Activities contributing to this output were completed and achieved in Y2.
Output 3.1.2 National civil society actors identify and develop ideas and plans for collaboration
Collaboration of national civil society actors is demonstrated
3.1.2 # of notes indicating collaboration developed
This is a count of documents that summarise proceedings and actions of meetings. Actions and proceedings will indicate collaboration, e.g. in the form of joint activities or statements.
Two meeting notes have been developed. The notes provide a context update and a summary of agreed actions for civil society actors to collaborate on. Following the civil society actor meeting in June 2017, sixteen priority areas and action points were identified for joint implementation over a six month period. In order to facilitate this, working groups were formed – each with an identified focal point to ensure actions are followed up and completed. These working groups will also support future collaboration and joint working between civil society actors. The working groups are focused on the following themes: knowledge management, strengthening existing society mechanisms for coordination, national level advocacy targeting political actors, and international advocacy. The third meeting for YR 1 was rescheduled to the first quarter of YR 2 due to unavailability of participants in the originally planned period.
Two meetings were held with civil society actors to discuss follow up actions on collaboration and coordination among civil society actors. A total of 53 actors (20 female, 33 male) participated in the meetings. Civil society actors discussed and agreed on joint responses towards issues related to peace and stability. A list of actions was developed and roles assigned for implementation. The program has developed an advocacy strategy that guides its engagement with regional and international actors on key issues.
Civil society actors held a meeting at the beginning of the year during which they developed analyses of the context and agreed on joint actions to respond to a identified changes
Output 3.2.1 Comparative analysis is made available to national level civil society actors
Context analysis
3.2.1 # of civil society actors that receive context analysis reports
Count of people who are part of the national level civil society group and have received context analysis
An additional 189 subscribers to an advocacy listserv also received the context analysis updates, totaling 243 in Q2. In Quarter 2 (July to September 2017) an additional 65 civil society actors participated in discussions on select topics related to the context analysis developed during the June 2017 civil society actor meeting. Discussions on the impact of national and international collaboration between civil society actors were held with a view of improving coordination and collaboration between civil society. A paper on the impact of regional and international collaboration was developed and shared with eight civil society actors. Discussions were also held with three parliamentarians. The discussions centered on exploring their views on constitution making, access to health and addressing violence against women. The discussions are informing advocacy campaigns and messages planned by the program that will target parliamentarians.
An additional five civil society actors than targeted participated in and received context analysis during a civil society actors meeting held in this period. More actors participated to allow for a diverse range of views to be heard.
Civil society actors are provided with regular context analysis and updates to facilitate coordination and enable joint action
Output 3.2.2 Improved capacity of civil society actors to advocate for change in international policy and practice
Increase in knowledge and skills of civil society actors will contribute to improved ability to advocate for change
3.2.2. % of civil society actors that report having improved capacity to raise awareness and advocate to international policy actors and platforms
This is a self-reported indicator. A criteria on advocacy skills and awareness raising knowledge and skills will be provided to civil society actors to self-assess themselves.
An online poll was conducted with 16 civil society actors who participated in the June civil society actor meeting. All the respondents said that the context updates were useful in their work. This points to the importance of the context updates in raising awareness among civil society actors on issues to prioritise for advocacy at national, regional and international levels.
Sub Outcome 2:2: Regional civil society working groups collectively plan, facilitate and implement conflict- and gender-sensitive initiatives, informed by priorities and lessons identified at local level.
This outcome will track collaboration efforts between citizens, civil society and local authorities (where appropriate) on issues of common concern and creation of linkages between local- and national-level processes of conflict transformation, peacebuilding and social change.
Indicator SO2.2.1: Percent of initiatives implemented by civil society that are informed by local level analysis
According to the OECD DAC, “[CSOs] can be defined to include all non-market and non-state organizations outside of the family in which people organize themselves to pursue shared interests in the public domain. Examples include community-based organizations and village associations, environmental groups, women’s rights groups, farmers’ associations, faith-based organizations, labour unions, co-operatives, professional associations, chambers of commerce, independent research institutes and the not-for-profit media.” CSOs are voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation. The indicator will be a count of all initiatives that are planned for/implemented using evidence from research carried out by civil society or discussions in regional forums
Implementation of Outcome 2 and Sub-Outcome 2.2 are due to commence in Year 2 as originally planned. Changes to the planned approach for this Sub-Outcome are detailed above under Outcome 2. Steps have been taken to lay the foundations for this implementation area including planning a meeting on developing a small grants mechanism to be held in Q2 of Year 2.
While the establishment and convening of regional working groups was delayed to Q4 Y3, small grants and microgrants were disbursed to regional level CSOs and initiatives in fulfillment of this outcome. All the projects and initiatives funded by these small grants and microgrants were informed by local level analysis.
Indicator SO 2.2.2: Number and type of initiatives that are jointly implemented by civil society platforms at regional level
According to the OECD DAC, “[CSOs] can be defined to include all non-market and non-state organizations outside of the family in which people organize themselves to pursue shared interests in the public domain. Examples include community-based organizations and village associations, environmental groups, women’s rights groups, farmers’ associations, faith-based organizations, labour unions, co-operatives, professional associations, chambers of commerce, independent research institutes and the not-for-profit media.” CSOs are voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation. Civil society platforms at regional level refer to loose consortia formed by civil society attending regional platform meetings. The programme will provide small grants to civil society to implement activities that will respond to issues relating to human security that are identified by CAGS and or in regional level meetings. A joint initiative is one that is implemented by two or more members of civil society platforms at regional level
The first regional working group meeting will convene in Q4 Y3 after which joint initiatives are expected to be implemented.
Sub- Outcome 3.1: Key national and international civil society actors have a shared vision and approach for building a peaceful, just and democratic country in a more coordinated and strategic manner
The outcome will track coordination and collaboration of civil society actors at national and international levels on priorities and approaches for conflict transformation
Indicator SO 3.1: Number and type of joint initiatives, agreed positions and/or resolutions on conflict transformation by key national and international actors for conflict transformation
Count of activities that are implemented by two or more civil society actors at national level and international level
Significant progress has been made towards achieving this Sub-Outcome area. A total of two civil society actor meetings took place, bringing together 32 civil society actors to discuss key issues related to conflict transformation. Regular coordination between national and international civil society actors led to the creation of four working groups on priority areas; these sub-working groups are a new approach for the civil society actors and are a direct result of the consultations carried out with civil society actors to identify means to increase effectiveness and support more coordinated efforts.
Civil society actors continued to identify opportunities, considerations and options for conflict transformation, leading to more cooperation, and more coordinated and therefore effective action. Some examples include convening meetings between civil society actors to build relationships and commissioning joint research and analysis on political processes.
Sub-Outcome 1.1: Communities and civil society use locally derived analysis to plan and implement local level action plans and initiatives
Communities and civil society have the capacity to generate analysis of conflict issues and use this analysis to implement actions that address identified issues
Indicator SO1.1.1: Percent of CAG action plans and initiatives that incorporate PAR& CCS report findings
A CAG is a group of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities - who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the programme. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. Participatory Action Research will be carried out by the PAR/CCS correspondents on a bi-annual basis in order to identify human security issues that affect the communities. Findings from the research will be shared with the community during discussions that will be led by the CAGS. Action plans and initiatives refer to projects developed by the CAG. This indicator is a count of locally led actions that will be based on priorities identified during the PAR process. The actions should factor in the extent to which conflict sensitivity,gender sensitivity,peace building and gender transformative priorities are addressed
Initial findings from the community level assessments (CLAs) highlighted the need for sustainable, equitable and representative community-level structures to support development, promote cohesion, limit conflict and contribute to stability. Existing community structures fail to represent all members of the community and can be biased and political in nature. The CLAs have also indicated a willingness and clear request by targeted communities for support in identifying and addressing conflict and security issues. Further information will be collected and reported against this Sub-Outcome area in Year 2; activities and outputs that contribute to this sub-outcome commenced in Q4 of Year 1. Any delays in Year 1 as a result of the CLAs are expected to be recovered in Year 2; up to 6 CAGs will be established in Year 2. Related PAR activities will also take place as planned alongside the establishment of CAGs. Indicator figures for the related outputs will be modified to account for this change in implementation timeline and structure.
The formation of Community Action Groups (CAGs) began in Year 2 leading to the formation of seven community action groups. The formation of the groups was preceded by consultations involving representatives from the local administration,farmers, women, youth, IDPs, refugees and CBOs to develop a shared understanding around the CAGs, their role, and processes/guidelines for establishing them. In some areas, existing groups are working with the project to either strengthen or include aspects of safety, security, conflict and gender sensitivity in their existing initiatives.
Indicator SO 1.1.2: Percent of CAG discussions that incorporate PAR&CCS report findings
A CAG is a group of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities - who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the programme. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. Participatory Action Research will be carried out by the CAGS on a bi-annual basis in order to identify human security issues that affect the communities. Findings from the research will be shared with the community during discussions that will be led by the CAGS. Community communication system will use short messaging on mobile phones to pass on information human security issues. The messages will be sent to the partner server who will then compile them into a report that will be shared with the CAGS. Using PAR and CCS information, CAGS will hold periodic discussions to identify responses to identified human security issues. The indicator tracks the use of PAR and CCS information in these discussions .Use of information can be but is not limited to using the information generated through CCS&PAR to start a discussion, including an agenda item that relates to APR/CCS findings, presenting PAR findings and the CCS report to members in order to inform their opinions and suggestions. The indicator only tracks scheduled CAG discussions and does not include adhoc discussions
Indicator SO1.1.3: Percent of targeted civil society report having increased skills and knowledge to support local-level action
According to the OECD DAC, “[CSOs] can be defined to include all non-market and non-state organizations outside of the family in which people organize themselves to pursue shared interests in the public domain. Examples include community-based organizations and village associations, environmental groups, women’s rights groups, farmers’ associations, faith-based organizations, labour unions, co-operatives, professional associations, chambers of commerce, independent research institutes and the not-for-profit media.” CSOs are voluntary organizations with governance and direction coming from citizens or constituency members, without significant government-controlled participation or representation. This is a self-reported indicator. Skills and Knowledge to be passed on will be determined using a survey administered to civil society group members. Local level action refers to issues on human security, peace building and conflict resolution
Following a review process by the project team and based on learning from implementation, the team held a co-design workshop during which the teams’ understanding around participatory action and research was reviewed, refined and adjusted for contextual relevance. The proposed Participatory Action Research (PAR) was modified to the Participatory Action Learning in Crisis (PALC) approach, a methodology hinged on appreciative inquiry of existing community initiated coping mechanisms and initiatives in response to conflict and crisis.
Sub-Outcome 1.2: Communities, civil society actors and other state-level actors have access to information feedback loops to promote consultation, cooperation and increase trust
The sub-outcome tracks access to information on conflict issues and the utilisation of the information to address identified issues at the state level
Indicator SO1.2.1: Percent of community issues identified through CCS that are discussed and addressed
The CCS system is an existing system that uses short messages sent through mobile phones to document and report human security issues. The messages are sent by CCS correspondents based in villages to the implementing partner who then collates them into a report that is shared in community action group meetings/discussions. The indicator is a count of issues raised through the CCS system that have been discussed and addressed by CAGs. ‘Addressed and resolved’ refers to a situation in which a community structure has dealt with or discussed a conflict* and has subsequently settled that conflict according to the parties involved in the conflict.
Feedback from the initial ToT training of CCS and partner focal points indicated an appreciation by the participants of the CCS and a recognition of its importance in creating a pool of shared information which can be easily accessed and used at both the individual and community levels. Participants also validated and appended the topics and sub-topics that the system would be used to share information on, thereby giving more relevance to their community information needs. Following a team review meeting , the project partners agreed to adjust the sequencing of planned activities under Outcome 1 (and SO1.1 and SO1.2) to take into account the need to establish relationships and build trust with local communities.
Since Q2 of Year 2, the team has facilitated monthly community gatherings across the programme’s implementation locations. During these gatherings, communities discuss priority issues affecting the community’s stability, as identified through the CCS, and generate ideas for potential community action around some of these priorities.
Indicator SO1.2.2: Number of joint initiatives and statements resulting from state conferences
Conferences bringing together civil society will be held at state level. The conferences will provide an opportunity for information sharing, dialogue, debate and consensus building among civil society on human security issues. The indicator is a count of jointly agreed actions stemming from these conferences. Actions include collaborative efforts to address identified human security issues between two or more civil society members attending the conference. The indicator will not count actions pre-existing the conferences.
State level conferences will take place in Y4. This is due to the changes in the context which prevented this activity from taking place in Y3.
Sub-Outcome 2.1: Regional civil society working groups are raising awareness and advocating with national platforms on the impact of national dynamics on local communities
The sub-outcome will track joint advocacy efforts by civil society at the regional level (in-country) on identified conflict issues
Indicator SO2.1: Number of awareness and advocacy activities conducted by regional working groups
Regional working groups comprising nominated members of the CAGs, as well as national actors, who engage in dialogue and share information with each other, and with established national level networks will be formed. This indicator is a count of activities carried out by the regional working groups at national level in order to raise awareness on human security issues in the region and or advocate for issues identified in regional working groups.
Instead of creating formal platforms, which consultation and learning from past experiences indicated would present a challenge to sustainability, recipients of small grants will be brought together, alongside additional regional and national civil society, to discuss their grants, share lessons, identify potential priority areas and make connections with one another.
The first regional working group was convened in Q4 2019
Sub-Outcome 3.2: Advocacy to engage key international targets in policy dialogue influences their position to support opportunities to improve human security
The outcome tracks advocacy efforts by the programme
Indicator 3.2 : Number of regional and international advocacy and policy targets reached
Regional refers to the Africa region and international refers to policy making institutions outside Africa. Regional targets include the African Union while international targets include the European Union. A target will be considered reached if a brief, discussion, meeting has been held with them. This should be informed by an advocacy agenda/plan
Throughout 2017 targeted advocacy actions have taken place in an effort to influence the policy positions of key international targets in relation to conflict transformation in Sudan. Regular analysis of the context, deeper context analyses on thematic issues, on-going consultations and engagements with civil society and other national and international actors and the development of a Sudan Advocacy strategy have all supported targeted advocacy actions at both the national and international levels.
Significant progress has been made towards influencing policy makers at regional and international levels. Throughout 2018 there was regular analysis of the context and ongoing consultations and engagements with civil society. The analysis has provided a platform from which we have been able to undertake targeted advocacy at both the national and international levels. This has included meetings with a wide range of stakeholders including policy makers.
AU, Friends of Sudan, USAID, UN
Output 1.2.2 Communities, civil society actors, private sector and other stakeholders are mobilized to act on human security issues
Conferences will be held at state level to bring together key actors to discuss human security issues identified through the community action groups and Community Communication system.
1.2.2 # of conferences that engage actors at various levels
The indicator is a count of conferences held at state level to discuss human security issues.
Activities under this output will start in year 2 of the project
Activities contributing to this output will begin later in the year.
Activities that contribute to this output will be implemented in Y4. Delays were encountered in implementation due to significant changes to the political context in Sudan in Y3.
Output 1.2.1 Community action for improved human security stimulated through establishment of community communication system
This output falls under outcome 1; sub outcome 1.2. The community communication system will use short messages sent on mobile phones from CCS correspondents based in communities to the Partner. The messages will provide updates on community issues. The Partner will compile the messages into a report which will be shared during community meetings held at the community level and by the community action groups. Based on this information, community members will discuss and address the issues.
1.2.1 # of community CCS meetings held
The indicator is a count of community meetings that will be convened at community level by CCS correspondents on a monthly basis (to disseminate CCS results).
The activities connected to this output started in Q4 of Yr 1. The CCS handbook has been revised and a CCS system hub has been established. Two training workshops on the CCS system were held for 36 Trainers of Trainers (ToTs). The ToT training has established a pool of trainers as well as correspondents who in the first quarter of year 2 will identify and train additional individuals as community correspondents in the villages where the programme is being implemented. Following identification of the community correspondents, the CCS meetings will begin.
The community correspondent system is now fully operational. Correspondents trained in YR 1 provide weekly updates to the system through short messages. The correspondents provide updates on agreed on themes that include community safety, stability and peace. Monthly reports are then prepared and will be discussed during community monthly gatherings in the next quarter. A total of 51 (24 female, 27 male) community members have been trained and enrolled as correspondents. Village gatherings bringing together a cross section of people to discuss issues identified through the system have been held. During the gatherings, actions to address identified issues are discussed. Between July- September an additional 50 meetings were held, while in October-December, 49 meetings were held bringing the total number of meetings held to 128. In total 3501 (1773 women, 1728 men) people have participated in the meetings through which a number of actions to address safety have been developed.
Village gatherings continued albeit in a limited way due to changes in the context that did not allow for people to hold gatherings for the first two quarters of the year. This picked up in Q3.
Output 1.1.2 Community action groups focused on peace and conflict resolution are established and functional
This output falls under outcome 1; sub outcome 1.1. A Community action group is a group of 12-25 people who will be the focal point for participatory action research and resolving community-identified issues
1.1.2 # of CAGS formed
CAGs are groups of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the project. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. This indicator is a count of CAGS created by the project that suit the description above. CAGs will either be newly created structures or will be adapted existing structures. Both will count towards the target.
Activities for this output were scheduled to begin in Q4 of Year 1. Activities related to this output have however been re-scheduled to begin in Q1 of Year 2. The work plan was adjusted to enable establishment of the community communication system in advance of establishment of the community action groups in order to provide more time to build relationships within communities. The target value in YR 2 has been increased by 4 in order to adjust for targets not achieved in YR 1.
Preparatory activities to establish the community action groups are ongoing.
11 out of 12 planned Community Action Groups were formed.
Outcome 1: Local communities and civil society (including vulnerable groups such as women, youth, refugees, and IDPs) build local social cohesion, and work together to improve human security in their local areas.
This outcome aims to track transformation of local drivers of conflict and poverty as a result of empowering individuals, civil society actors and communities to take collective action to break cycles of violence and poverty
RA1.SG2. Percent of conflicts that are addressed and resolved by community action groups (CAGs) that are supported by the programme
Beneficiaries are the community action groups - a group of 12-25 people drawn from surrounding communities - who will participate in the participatory action research process, receive training and small grants and mentoring from the programme. Their role will include research analysis, action planning and implementation of initiatives to address locally identified issues. They will in addition be community focal points for conflict resolution. Special attention will need to be given to conflicts that are brought to the CAGs in a reactive manner vs those the CAG chooses to work on through the PAR process. The conflict log will account for this variation. ‘Conflicts’ refers to clashing of opposed interests, such as a crime, human rights violation, misdemeanor, civil dispute over land, commercial or family interests, personal status, employment, inheritance, etc. ‘Addressed and resolved’ refers to a situation in which a community structure has dealt with or discussed a conflict* and has subsequently settled that conflict according to the parties involved in the conflict.
Year 1 has focused on laying the foundations for implementation of activities under Outcome 1, including completing the Community Level Assessments (CLAs), identifying implementation locations and selecting partners. Early on in Year 1 the project team understood there would be need to review the proposed timeline of activities and give priority focus to undertaking the CLAs and related sensitisation and relationship building activities. This included providing enough time to secure the right project team members to participate in the CLAs (and future project interventions). These changes were communicated to the Netherlands MFA. Further delays in completing the CLAs, largely the result of security issues and challenges with permissions, has meant some delays to activities related to the outcome; additionally, a project team review held in October 2017 identified that a more strategic and risk adverse approach to implementation would be to roll out the Community Correspondent System (CCS) in all the identified locations prior to setting up Community Action Groups (CAGs).
The focus in the second year has been on expanding on and creating opportunities for coordination and collaboration among diverse groups of people through various avenues including dialogue. Findings indicate a range of issues across communities that contribute to insecurity and present barriers to social cohesion, and initial reports indicate that, given the space to do so, communities eagerly jointly identify clear actions to address these issues.
Indicator RA1.SG.4: Percent of programme beneficiaries that report they have the capacity to influence formal and/or informal human security authorities
Programme beneficiaries refers to members of community action groups (CAGS), surrounding communities served by the CAGs and members of civil society organizations directly targeted by the programme. The project will monitor the indicator; however the project does not have any direct activities that will contribute to its achievement. This indicator is being monitored under Outcome 1 but has the potential to be relevant to Outcome 2. However under this programme none of the programme beneficiaries will receive direct support to build their capacity to influence formal and informal authorities. Programme beneficiaries targeted under Outcome 2 will receive direct support to build their capacity to influence national platforms (which do not necessarily include authorities), programme beneficiaries targeted under Outcome 1 may indirectly have the opportunity to interact with and build relationships with local authorities. ‘the capacity to influence’ refers to the perception of respondents, i.e. to what extent they feel they are capable and effective in their efforts towards policy influencing, lobbying and advocacy. ‘Formal and informal human security authorities’ refers to those bodies from the security sector that are targeted through the programme (e.g. the local police and/or a community security mechanisms ) , NOT the entire security sector.
There is improvement in relationships between local authorities and communities-a case in point where in one community, community members formed a committee to advocate to local authorities to improve social services. This is significant because the community had not had interaction with local authorities before because they did not have trust in the system and believed that they could not influence authorities. Communities have also initiated campaigns to address social problems for example; a campaign was implemented by a community in response to a disease outbreak-further evidence of improved cohesion and collaboration.
GB-CHC-1043843-UNPBF_Somalia_K010
Saferworld
Making Space for Peacebuilding: Strengthening Participation and Safety of Women Activists and Journalists in South West state and Jubaland, Somalia
The project goal is to enhance the safety of women activists and journalists (including those from marginalized groups and selected local women’s organizations and networks) in Jubaland and South West states of Somalia, and broaden the civic space for their meaningful participation in peacebuilding and political processes. It aims to address three intertwined conflict drivers that negatively affect women activists’ civic and political participation: 1. Patriarchal social norms; 2. Exclusion of women from key decision-making arenas, such as formal and clan-based dispute resolution, security provision, and political institutions; 3. Weaponization of GBV to maintain the status quo.
Saferworld
Saferworld
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
Saferworld
Programmes
Eva Mutenga
Partnerships Development Manager
emutenga@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk/
784948
274732
First transfer
UNDP
Saferworld
262045.51
Saferworld
274732
UNDP
Saferworld
Outcome 1: Women-rights organizations have skills to gather and analyse data on incidences and types of gendered violence
women activists face, and develop evidence on violence against activists to inform programming and advocacy with
duty-bearers.
% of trainedwomen activiststhat reporthaving increasedskills andknowledge togather andanalyse incidentsof gender-basedviolence
Number ofadvocacy actionplans developedthat respond toissues raisedthrough the dataanalysis
Outcome 2: Women civil society activists in South West and Jubaland and their respective organizations implement new security protocols and practices to reduce the number and severity of security threats
% of women activists and journalists who report they have increased knowledge of available GBV services and protection mechanisms
Outcome 3: Duty bearers and communities acknowledge the insecurity women activists face and take steps to support for operational and policy responses to VAW and women’s political and peacebuilding participation at community and FMS levels.
# and % of Duty bearers and CSO networks targeted by the program who report that they have greater support for operational and policy responses to VAW and women’s political and peacebuilding participation at community and FMS levels.
60%
125 duty bearers (82 women and 43 men)
# of duty bearers and CSOs who meaningfully participate discussions addressing VAW
18 Duty bearers (3 government officials in Kismayo, 10 CSOs in Mogadishu, and 5 police officers in Baidoa)
`Outcome 4: Local women activists use new and strengthened movement building and networks to increase the impact of advocacy initiatives at national level.
Number of politicians/parliamentarians/public officials targeted that express support
% of women activists who report that they have had meaningful opportunities to be involved in discussion or consultation related to the national policies/laws addressing VAW
Output 1.1: Women-led Violence Against Women Observatories/Dashboards (3 per FMS) are established to systematically monitor and manage data on violence against women activists.
number of
observatories/dashboards
established
number of people trained on GBV data management and security
Output 1.2: WROs safely monitor and track incidences and types of gendered violence against women activists, thus increasing the evidence base for more effective programming responses and advocacy.
number of macro data analysis reports produced.
number of small grants provided to women activists.
number FMS peer-to-peer learning sessions for women activists conducted
Output 2.1: Protection mechanisms, GBV service- mapping, GBV service provision and referral pathways are updated and shared in coordination with local women’s organizations.
number of mapping exercise conducted.
number of women who receive messages of available protection mechanisms andGBV services
% of women referred to GBV services provided by the project who receive support
Output 2.2: Women’s organizations and women activists provided with technical skills to increase security and strengthen protection mechanisms
number of needs assessments conducted
number of women organizations involved or collaborated with in the designing of the training package Disaggregated by age
number of members of women organizations and women activists attend technical trainings. Disaggregated by age
Output 3.1: Women’s networks strengthened through funded support to develop and implement advocacy strategies.
number of women members participating in fora, and/or safe and private groups. Disaggregated by age:
number of advocacy strategies developed and implemented.
Output 3.2: Increased awareness of communities and duty-bearers at community and FMS levels on political violence against
women and their role in conflict prevention.
number of briefings produced that address VAW and shared with police gender desks for action/decision making.
number of female and male champions identified and supported with advocacy skills by the program on peacebuilding and political participation.
number of media communications shared with the wider community
Output 4.1: New collaborations formed between FMS level and national level activists
number of small grants provided to women organizations and media networks
number of outreach campaigns conducted through radio stations on political violence against women
number of women activists, journalists and peacebuilders participated in movement building events. Disaggregated by age:
Output 4.2: Directors/leaders of women’s organizations and media networks at local levels participate in national-level advocacy opportunities.
number of small grants provided to women organizations and media networks
number of community visits of women organization’s representatives.
Output 4.3: Duty-bearers at national levels have increased awareness, and evidence on political violence against women
activists, their role in peacebuilding and political processes, and selected champions support advocating for
women’s participation in political and
number of female and male champions in specific FGS government offices
number of advocacy meetings with critical duty-bearers and policy makers at national and international levels
GB-CHC-1043843-ECUzbekistan_D043
Saferworld
Strengthening Civil Society and Authorities to Advance Gender Equality and Women’s Rights in Uzbekistan
Saferworld and partners will improve the overall ability of target groups (CSOs including those run shelters, and women-led CSOs working on gender and women’s rights, state-led rehabilitation centres, and government authorities) to more effectively deliver initiatives and services to improve gender equality and women’s rights in Uzbekistan
European Commission - Europe Aid
Saferworld
Saferworld
Rachel Huang
188692.9
210913.25
188534
Outcome 3: CSOs (including CSO-run shelters, women-led CSOs and members of a CSO network), authorities who run rehabilitation centres, and community groups/individuals in Jizzakh, Samarkand and Namangan, are provided with flexible and accessible funding to design and implement initiatives that promote and respond to their priorities and broader women, peace and security (WPS) issues, including through working collaboratively with authorities in each location.
3.1 Percentage of CSOs, authorities who run rehabilitation centres and community structures/individuals that successfully implement action plans that focus on promoting gender equality and women's rights (disaggregated by CSO type e.g. women-led, youth-led, minority-led, urban/rural etc.)
3.2 Percentage of participants (especially women) that report that the action plans responded to their priorities in each location and contributed to promoting gender equality and women’s rights (disaggregated by gender, age, and, where feasible social determinants such as disability, minority/majority etc.)
Outcome 4: Local and national authorities better understand the harmful gender and social norms, and related practices/traditions, which drive violence against women and which negatively impact women and girls’ safety and participation in decision-making, and take steps to incorporate women’s and girls’ priorities into policy dialogue and development, and related government strategies.
4.1 Number of national level authorities who make a specific commitment to implement the recommendations/priorities raised (through action plans and the gap analysis) by women-led CSOs to promote gender equality and women's rights
4.2 Percentage of government policies/documents that directly refer to strengthening women’s participation (not only on issues that affect them directly but also on broader issues) and that respond to the recommendations and priorities raised by women-led CSOs that they have engaged with.
Strengthen the capacities and coordination of civil society (including CSO-run shelters, women-led CSOs and members of a CSO network), authorities (including state-run rehabilitation centres) and communities, to fight against discrimination, especially violence against women and girls, and contribute to policy dialogue on gender equality and women’s rights, that enables active participation and decision-making of women in Uzbekistan.
Impact Indicator 1:
Percentage of project participants (particularly women) who feel that CSOs and local authorities (including those that run rehabilitation centers and shelters) are responding to their priorities in line with the issues that they raise (particularly around GBV, gender equality and women’s rights in Uzbekistan) (disaggregated by stakeholder type e.g. CSOs, authorities, shelters).
Impact Indicator 2:
Examples of project stakeholders who report improved coordination between CSOs and local authorities (disaggregated by gender, age and, where feasible, social determinants such as disability, location, majority/minority etc.)
Outcome 1: CSOs and authorities lead in the analysis and research which produces ongoing analysis of the gaps in capacity, coordination and effectiveness of civil society and authorities implementing services to improve gender equality and enhance women's rights (including GBV prevention) in Jizzakh, Samarkand and Namangan, with further analysis at national level.
1.1 Number of gap analyses conducted in each project location with CSO partners
(disaggregated by location and theme)
1.2 Number of CSOs and authorities that actively participate/contribute to the gap analysis and share their experiences/challenges
(disaggregated by location and CSO type (women-led, minority-led etc.) or type of authority (role/designation, etc.)
Outcome 2: CSOs (including those who run shelters, and other women-led CSOs), staff from state-run rehabilitation centres and community groups/individuals are supported to strengthen their organisational and collective capacity to collaborate and share learning with authorities on issues related to gender equality and women’s rights (such as protection strategies and stronger gender policies and practice) in a demand-led way, and through a gender-responsive and conflict sensitive approach, using accompaniment models based on solidarity and equal partnerships principles.
2.1 Percentage of CSOs, authorities and community groups/individuals who report that they have greater agency to coordinate among them between them and authorities and have established a way of working together that is based on solidarity and equal partnership principles (disaggregated by CSO type e.g. women-led, youth-led, minority-led, urban/rural etc.)
2.2 Examples of collaborative initiatives between CSOs, authorities and community groups/individuals that are based on sharing learning and experiences (disaggregated by type of initiative in relation to a focus)
Output 0.1
Inception/cross-cutting activities informing the entire project.
0.1.1 Number of Saferworld and partner staff recruited for the project
0.1.2 Number of letters sent/meetings held with authorities to provide an overview of the project, and secure buy-in and project approval from authorities.
0.1.3 Number of staff of rehabilitation centres and shelters identified to invite to the inception workshop.
Output 1.1 One joint gap analysis (including methodology) developed to analyse needs and gaps, and findings produced to inform subsequent project activities.
1.1.1 Number of inception workshops held for Saferworld and partner project staff, government authorities, CSOs, shelter and rehabilitation staff on Saferworld peacebuilding approaches, safeguarding, conflict- and gender-sensitive analysis, MEL, reporting and jointly co-designing gap analysis methodology
1.1.2 Number of participants in the inception workshop
1.1.3 Number of methodologies developed to identify the needs and gaps of shelters and rehabilitation centres during the inception workshop
1.1.4 Number of CSOs and authorities involved in the process of identifying the needs and gaps in the capacity and coordination of CSOs and authorities.
1.1.5 Number of assessment reports produced based on the gap analysis and consultations with the shelters and rehabilitation centres.
1.1.6 Number of district-level meetings to present the findings of the gap analysis to key stakeholders (such as government officials, representatives from the EC, CSOs, shelter and rehabilitation centre staff and community leaders).
Output 2.1 Six demand-driven training sessions (two per target region, two days per training) on capacity development and coordination support conducted jointly with CSOs, authorities and community groups/individuals to improve coordinated delivery of high-quality gender equality and women’s rights initiatives.
2.1.1 Number of trainings held for CSOs, authorities and community groups/individuals.
2.1.2 Number of participants in the trainings.
2.1.3 Percentage of training participants who say that they were 'somewhat' or 'very' satisfied with the training.
Output 2.2
Two learning exchanges (between CSOs and authorities with their counterparts from two to four former Soviet countries who have seen improvements in gender equality and women’s rights (including GBV prevention), are held to share learning on effective coordination and collaboration, high quality service delivery, and advocacy.
2.2.1 Number of participants in the in-person learning exchange (disaggregated by gender, age and nationality).
2.2.2 Number of participants in the online learning exchange (disaggregated by gender, age and nationality)
2.2.3 Examples of topics discussed in the learning exchanges (such as different models of working on GBV prevention, women’s rights and gender equality).
Output 3.1 Four workshops conducted and 12 action plans (six from CSO-run shelters and state-run rehabilitation centres, four from community groups/individuals, and two from other women-led CSOs) developed, funded and implemented to address priorities identified by project participants.
3.1.1 Number of action plan initiation workshops held for CSOs and/or community structures, authorities, shelter and rehabilitation centres and partners on action plan development.
3.1.2 Number of participants in the action plan initiation workshop (disaggregated by gender, age, and social determinants such as disability, minority/majority, etc.)
3.1.3 Number of online consultations to support development of action plans.
3.1.4: Number of participants in each of the three action plan outcome harvesting workshops.
3.1.5 Number of action plan proposals submitted from women-led CSOs, including members of the Uzbek women-led CSO network
3.1.6: Number of action plans supported by small grants in selected locations that promote gender quality and women empowerment (data disaggregation based on the type of actors supported).
Output 4.1 One briefing paper produced jointly with project participants which presents national-level policy recommendations to promote and protect gender equality and women’s rights (including GBV prevention and protection), as well as one national-level roundtable, meetings and one communications plan outlining a series of communications outreach activities to increase their reach.
4.1.3 Number of people reached by communications and advocacy materials promoting lessons learnt and recommendations, based on communications plan developed during the project and the resulting additional communications materials focusing on engaging visual/audio content
4.1.1: Number of communication and advocacy materials promoting lessons learnt and recommendations produced.
4.1.2 Number of people who download or receive the briefings with national-level policy recommendations based on learning from preceding project activities.
4.1.4: Number of participants at the national-level roundtable.
GB-CHC-1043843-CSSF_A027
Saferworld
Resourcing Change Phase II: Supporting Women’s Rights Organisations (WROs) and women’s networks in Fragile and Conflict Affected States (FCAS)
To support women’s rights organisations (WROs) and networks in Yemen, South Sudan and Nigeria to increase their independent and collective roles in leading gender transformative programming and advocacy on women, peace and security (WPS) issues (e.g. peacebuilding, gender equality, women’s empowerment and participation, GBV prevention and response) and strengthen their collective work through holistic capacity strengthening and movement building.
UK - Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Saferworld
Saferworld
Women for Women International (UK)
Eva Mutenga
Partnerships Development Manager
+211915723535
emutenga@saferworld.org.uk
https://www.saferworld.org.uk
1474815
1534051
1500369
729174
FCDO
Saferworld
536652
Saferworld
40711
Saferworld
897450
Saferworld
249010
FCDO
Saferworld
496631
FCDO
Saferworld
520645
FCDO
Saferworld
Outcome: Women’s rights organisations (WROs) and networks in Yemen, South Sudan and Nigeria have increased their independent and collective roles in leading programming and advocacy on women, peace and security (WPS) issues (e.g. peacebuilding, gender equality, women’s empowerment and participation, GBV prevention and response) and strengthen their collective work through holistic capacity strengthening and movement building.
Outcome indicator 1.1: Percentage of WROs and networks reporting increased capacity in their WPS self-defined organisational and programmatic priority areas (disaggregated by gender, age, disability, location, and (dis)placement)
80% reporting improvement of at least scale point on 5-point Likert scale
Outcome indicator 1.2: Evidence of WROs' and networks’ funded initiatives that demonstrate changes and progress towards WPS pillars based on self-defined priorities.
Outcome indicator 1.3: Examples of collaborative initiatives between WROs and networks working in the same area or on the same topic (examples will include disaggregation by type of initiative in relation to a focus on youth, elders, persons with disabilities (PwDs), internally displaced persons (IDPs) or ethnic or religious minorities).
Outcome indicator 1.4: Number and descriptions of laws, policies and practices drafted, reviewed and/or adopted by relevant sub-national and national authorities - that take up gender responsive approach to their peacebuilding strategy and interventions.
Output 1: WROs and women’s networks are provided flexible, core, and medium-term funding opportunities to meet self-defined priorities, and in turn increase and strengthen their work on WPS issues (e.g. peacebuilding, gender equality, women’s empowerment and participation, and GBV prevention and response).
Output indicator 1.1: Number of Women’s Funds joining the Consortium
Output indicator 1.2: Number of WROs and networks receiving flexible, core funding
Output indicator 1.3: No. of proposals submitted by WROs and Networks entailing their self-defined priorities on WPS issues/pillars
Output indicator 1.4: Number and type of initiatives and/or institutional strengthening actions implemented with the flexible funding provided (type will include disaggregation of initiatives in relation to a focus on youth, elders, PwDs, IDPs or ethnic or religious minorities).
Output 2: WROs and women’s networks are supported to strengthen their organisational and collective capacity in a strategic, demand-led way through WRO/network-led peer-learning and accompaniment models based on solidarity, meaningful engagement and equal partnerships principles.
Output indicator 2.1: Number of capacity strengthening plans co-designed with WROs/networks (disaggregated by type of WRO/network including their focus as above)
Output indicator 2.2: Number of capacity strengthening initiatives implemented (disaggregated by provider – Consortium vs WRO/network including their focus as above)
Output 3: WROs and women’s networks are provided appropriate spaces for networking, joint coordination, strategising and alliance building with each other and allies in the global WPS sector, and to strengthen their movements and networks towards common understandings of gender-transformative, inclusive peacebuilding and development.
Output indicator 3.6: Number of policy and learning papers produced and disseminated
Output indicator 3.5: Number of advocacy activities organised by WROs targeting decision makers and influencers to support their work on WPS
Output indicator 3.1 Number of national and international events and/or meetings that bring WROs/networks together for collaboration, strategizing and share learnings
Output indicator 3.2: Number of participants at learning and dissemination events (disaggregated by gender, age, disability, actor type, event)
Output indicator 3.3: Number of participants reporting satisfaction in joining these spaces
Output indicator 3.4: Number of participants increased knowledge on gender transformative and inclusive WPS approaches
GB-CHC-1043843-EC_FerghanaValley_D046
Saferworld
Supporting civil society to deliver inclusive, locally-led peacebuilding initiatives in the Ferghana Valley
Saferworld and partners will empower civil society in the Fergana Valley to deliver inclusive, locally-led
peacebuilding and violence prevention initiatives with cross-border and regional scope
European Commission - Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Saferworld
Saferworld
Rachel Huang
371763.9
384388.1
371763.90
To empower civil society in the Fergana Valley to deliver inclusive, locally-led peacebuilding and violence prevention initiatives with cross-border and regional scope.
Impact Indicator 1: Percentage of CSOs who report that they have increased capacity, knowledge and networks to more effectively work with border communities and authorities on the myriad inter-connected challenges faced in border regions of the Fergana Valley.
Impact indicator 2: Examples of civil society representatives who can describe how the project has strengthened their agency in policy and decision-making, including with their counterparts in neighbouring countries.
Outcome 1: Local civil society actors and networks strengthen their institutional and operational capacity to create and consolidate spaces for dialogue in border areas of the Fergana Valley in a strategic, demand-led way, using models based on solidarity, meaningful engagement and equal partnership.
1.1 Percentage of CSOs whose individual organisational capacity assessments accurately reflect their institutional, organisational and technical capacity needs and priorities
1.2 Percentage of CSOs who report that they have strengthened their institutional and organisational capacity on identified topics in line with their self-defined priorities
1.3 Number of CSOs that actively participate / contribute to cross border dialogue spaces and needs assessments and share their experiences/challenges
Outcome 2: Local civil society actors and networks are provided with funding and support to increase their engagement with communities and local authorities through implementation of cross-border conflict prevention and peacebuilding initiatives.
2.1 Percentage of CSOs (especially women and youth-led) who attended the trainings who go on to
implement local-level and cross-border action plan initiatives
2.2 Number and type of action plans /initiatives funded and implemented which contribute to conflict prevention and peacebuilding in line with community needs and priorities (including cross-border action plans/ initiatives)
2.3 Percentage of action plans developed and implemented with input from community members living in border areas
Outcome 3: Local civil society actors and networks develop appropriate spaces to exchange evidence-based outcomes and learning, and to cooperate, network, and engage with local, national, regional and international institutions on peacebuilding, including to advance the rights of women, youth and other marginalised groups.
3.1 Percentage of CSOs/authorities who report that they effectively exchanged key lessons with each other
3.2. Percentage of civil society representatives engaged by the project who report that they have increased capacity to influence policy and decision-making
Output 0.1: Inception activities informing the entire project.
0.1.1 Number of Saferworld and partner staff recruited for the project
0.1.2 Number of letters sent/meetings held with authorities to provide an overview of the project, and secure buy-in and project approval from authorities
0.1.3 Number of Saferworld and partners staff participating in the two-day inception workshop in Uzbekistan
Output 1.1: One mapping document (covering Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan) developed, outlining existing CSOs and networks to potentially be involved in the project, with snowball methodology to increase its reach
1.1.1 Number of participants of discussions to be held to identify existing CSOs and networks to potentially be involved in the project
1.1.2 Number of mapping documents produced outlining existing CSOs and networks to potentially be involved in the project (including type of organisation e.g. women/youth-led etc)
Output 1.2: One assessment of CSO needs and gaps, outlining which areas they need further support on to more effectively work on peacebuilding and violence prevention locally, nationally and regionally.
1.2.1 Number of focus groups with CSOs on gaps and needs assessment
1.2.2 Number of assessments of needs and gaps produced based on survey and consultations
Output 1.3: Methodology developed for ToT and implemented with partners and their established civil society networks.
1.3.1 Number of needs assessments conducted with grassroot organisations/ in-country network of CSOs
1.3.2 Number of methodologies produced based on the needs assessment, involving peer support where possible and external consultants where needed
1.3.3 Number of ToT workshops conducted for civil society actors
1.3.4 Number of participants at the ToT workshop
Output 2.1: Action plans developed by civil society actors and networks and submitted to main partners in each country for selection and implementation
2.1.1 Number of action plan initiation workshops held for civil society actors and networks at the regional level
2.1.2 Number of participants in the action plan initiation workshop
2.1.3 Number of online consultations to support development of action plans
2.1.4 Number of criteria developed for the selection of action plans
2.1.5 Number of community members consulted in developing action plans
2.1.6 Number of small grants provided to successful applicants to implement action plans
Output 3.1: Learning exchanges conducted and communications outputs developed to improve practice and policy on cross-border peacebuilding and violence prevention.
3.1.1 Number of participants attending in-person exchange of experience on action plan implementation and outcome harvesting workshops
3.1.2 Number of photo collections developed/exhibitions organised (at the international conference or trip to Brussels) and briefings delivered
3.1.3 Number of participants attending the exchange/advocacy trip to EU to learn about best practices relating to resource management, cross-border peacebuilding and to present results of the project
3.1.4 Number of participants attending the international conference on sustainability of regional cross-border cooperation and civil society support, gaps/needs, and local-level lessons